Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14486
Your paranoid android
... could you run
http://kegel.com/wine/loop-fail.sh.txt
overnight on the hardware you plan to bring, and
email me the results? It creates a log file
loop-fails.log which lists each test failure and
how many loops it took to get there.
Thanks!
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the filename and toolbar field are not present, we will be using
> uninitialized RECTs, so initialize them.
>
> CID 5033, 5034
>
> Ciao, Marcus
> ---
> dlls/comdlg32/itemdlg.c |2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dl
Could you point me to a link on this behavior? I'm pretty sure that
many of these buttons send a signal that applications can hook into
and override the default (do-nothing) behavior.
The documentation for those specific values appears to be non-existent -
the latest (as far as I'm aware) HTML
> + case IDTB_NOTES:
> + case IDTB_CONTENTS:
> + case IDTB_INDEX:
> + case IDTB_SEARCH:
> + case IDTB_HISTORY:
> + case IDTB_FAVORITES:
> + /* These are officially unimplemented as of the Windows 7 SDK */
> + break;
Could you point me
Marcus Meissner writes:
> Hi,
>
> If the filename and toolbar field are not present, we will be using
> uninitialized RECTs, so initialize them.
It's not clear that 0 is much better. If there's really a possibility
for these things to be missing the layout should take that into
account.
--
Ale
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:50, Louis Lenders
wrote:
> Note: the 2 failing tests on test-bot that this patch will produce, are not
> real failures as winnt and win2000 will not run the test because of missing
> dpnet
>
> try 3: rewrote patch in a more straightforward way
>
> this makes previousl
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14466
Your paranoid android
Alistair Leslie-Hughes writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/mshtml/Makefile.in b/dlls/mshtml/Makefile.in
> index 3933645..62a2d6f 100644
> --- a/dlls/mshtml/Makefile.in
> +++ b/dlls/mshtml/Makefile.in
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ C_SRCS = \
> htmlbody.c \
> htmlcomment.c \
> htmlcurstyle.c \
> +
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Andrew Talbot wrote:
>
>> Alex Bradbury wrote:
>>
>>> Marking fall through cases sounds reasonable on the face of it to me.
>>> I question the necessity of adding 'unaudited' comments though. I'd
>>> imagine lint or one of the more sophisticated static analysis tools
>>> cou
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Alex Bradbury wrote:
>
>> Marking fall through cases sounds reasonable on the face of it to me.
>> I question the necessity of adding 'unaudited' comments though. I'd
>> imagine lint or one of the more sophisticated static analysis tools
>> could pretty easily give you a li
11 matches
Mail list logo
