On 17 September 2011 09:29, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Kiefer wrote:
>> On 15.09.2011 21:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
>>
>> It might be related to frequency scaling.
>> I have a Phenom II X4 945 and con
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Good call! After doing
> for cpu in `seq 0 3` do; sudo cpufreq-set -g performance -c $cpu; done
> the a8-3850 runs configure in 37 seconds (instead of 67)!
>
>> It would be interesting to know how the i7 fares when using the
>> performance gove
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Kiefer wrote:
> On 15.09.2011 21:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
>
> It might be related to frequency scaling.
> I have a Phenom II X4 945 and configure runs in 29 seconds, but only
> when using the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 13:55, Bernhard Loos
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Bernhard Loos
>> wrote:
> It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
> today out of about 30 build/test runs.
> Has any
On 15.09.2011 21:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
> My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
> (Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.)
> Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds.
> My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds.
> The same seems to hold fo
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:38, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> it would of course be great. Check out
> http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/source/browse/trunk/tests/winetricks-test
> for starters, we could just run that (or a subset of it) daily.
> It's fairly reliable, as I ran it manually every
On Friday 16 September 2011 23:54:03 Dan Kegel wrote:
> The rpct4 change seems seriously wrong, offhand, given
> how widespread the breakage it sometimes causes is.
> (A lot of tests seemed to think that the C:\ drive didn't exist.)
There's hope that once the buildbot works well enough that Alexand
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Mercifully, this kind of breakage doesn't happen often, so I guess
> I'm ok with doing local reverts when it does. I'm just worried that
> I won't be able to get to it quickly enough, and the resulting barrage
> of test failures will turn peopl
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I'm not going to revert patches, that would make a mess of the
> history. Reverting is a serious event and should happen only when a
> change is completely wrong, not when it happens to not be 100% correct
> or to have some unwanted side
Dan Kegel writes:
> But sometimes bad patches don't fail during the few test runs
> currently done, get committed, and then start causing unrelated
> patches to fail randomly, poisoning future test runs until it the bug
> is fixed or the bad patch reverted.
> It would be nice if Alexandre reverte
Wine's test suite is now nine years old, and thanks in large part
to Ge's testbot, new tests tend to actually work on windows.
There's a lot of passing tests at http://test.winehq.org, which is awesome.
Wine developers routinely use it to avoid sending bad patches.
And yet, some bad patches do get
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
> (Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.)
> Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds.
> My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds.
> The same see
On 09/16/11 15:42, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Jacek Caban wrote:
[...]
hres = CoCreateInstance(&CLSID_WebBrowser, NULL,
CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER|CLSCTX_INPROC_HANDLER,
&IID_IUnknown, (void**)unk);
-ok_(__FILE__,line)(hres == S_OK, "Creating WebBrowser objec
Hi Bruno,
it would of course be great. Check out
http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/source/browse/trunk/tests/winetricks-test
for starters, we could just run that (or a subset of it) daily.
It's fairly reliable, as I ran it manually every week for a while
and weeded out a lot of flaky bits.
When
On 16 September 2011 16:56, Seth Shelnutt wrote:
> Personally I think automated application testing is the next major testing
> platform for wine. Test suites are the most important, but application
> testing can mean knowing when new software works in wine and from a user
> standpoint of view mor
You might be interested in looking at Appinstall by Austin English. He has
done some great work on using autohotkey and doing application installs. I
started a GSOC project that wasn't accepted last year to improve upon it.
I've made improvements since then but I guess I never pushed it to my
githu
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Build fails here?
>
> ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include
> -DWINE_STRICT_PROTOTYPES -DWINE_NO_NAMELESS_EXTENSION -D_REENTRANT
> -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes
Build fails here?
ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include
-DWINE_STRICT_PROTOTYPES -DWINE_NO_NAMELESS_EXTENSION -D_REENTRANT
-fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement
-Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings
-Wpointer-arith -Wlo
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14328
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14330
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14329
Your paranoid android
Hi, I would like your opinion about a project I may start based on
BuildBot (if the Dan/license allows).
It's named crashbot because it's intended to automate testing of
applications that crash in wine. The main goal is reduce the amount of
time wasted on retesting bugzilla applications that autho
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Jacek Caban wrote:
[...]
> > hres = CoCreateInstance(&CLSID_WebBrowser, NULL,
> > CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER|CLSCTX_INPROC_HANDLER,
> > &IID_IUnknown, (void**)unk);
> > -ok_(__FILE__,line)(hres == S_OK, "Creating WebBrowser object failed:
> > %08x\n", hres);
>
On 09/16/11 15:25, Francois Gouget wrote:
---
This fixes this test on the WNT4WSSP6 testbot machine.
It also helps on my NT4 VM but one would not notice because there's no
ieframes dll so WineTest does not even try to run this test!
dlls/ieframe/tests/webbrowser.c |5 -
1 files chang
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14315
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14318
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14325
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14322
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14324
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14323
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14321
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14319
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14317
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14314
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14313
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14312
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14311
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14310
Your paranoid android
On 09/16/11 13:39, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14307
Your paranoid android
On 16 September 2011 11:17, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Another thing your second patch breaks is vsync because there won't be any
> swapbuffer calls. Although arguably that was kinda broken since we replaced
> flips with blits.
>
It was broken even before that, since it's set at context creation,
On 09/03/2011 03:54 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 10:04 AM, Susan Cragin wrote:
>> There was discussion about putting a daily wine build on the ubuntu ppa.
>> I'd like to put in a word for having it on the development version
>> (currently oneiric) as well as the stable version (natty)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.09.2011 um 01:29 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 16 September 2011 01:03, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:01:50 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>>> In principle this allows us to use more than one backbuffer in ddraw. It's
>>> also
43 matches
Mail list logo
