On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:28:53AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote:
> > ---
> > dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c | 148
> > +-
> > dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c | 16 ++---
> > 2 files changed, 54 in
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Bernhard Loos
> wrote:
It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
today out of about 30 build/test runs.
Has anybody else noticed problems?
>>>
>>> It smells like the rpcrt
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Dan Kegel writes:
>
>> It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
>> today out of about 30 build/test runs.
>> Has anybody else noticed problems?
>
> It smells like the rpcrt4 change.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
On 16 September 2011 01:03, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:01:50 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> In principle this allows us to use more than one backbuffer in ddraw. It's
>> also a requirement for the next patch.
> I think this, and the next patch should be implemented in wined
On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:01:50 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> In principle this allows us to use more than one backbuffer in ddraw. It's
> also a requirement for the next patch.
I think this, and the next patch should be implemented in wined3d by handling
D3DSWAPEFFECT_FLIP in essentially the same
On 15. sep. 2011 21:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
(Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.)
Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds.
My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds.
The same seems to hold for doi
My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script.
(Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.)
Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds.
My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds.
The same seems to hold for doing builds with ccache; AMD fares poorly
the
Le 14/09/2011 14:19, Bernhard Loos a écrit :
---
dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c | 53 +++---
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Hi!
I had a quite similar patch, but you beat me!
Anyway, aren't those funtions susceptible to be called in a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Bernhard Loos
wrote:
>>> It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
>>> today out of about 30 build/test runs.
>>> Has anybody else noticed problems?
>>
>> It smells like the rpcrt4 change.
I thought so, too.
> I admit I'm a bit at a loss
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:35, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Changelog:
> msxml3: Move and Register xmlparser.idl in msxml3
>
>
> Best Regards
> Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Howdy Alistair,
You forgot to remove the include from include/Makefile.in, causing a
build failure here:
make[1]
Dan Kegel writes:
> It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
> today out of about 30 build/test runs.
> Has anybody else noticed problems?
It smells like the rpcrt4 change.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 09/15/11 18:38, Dan Kegel wrote:
Fails here under WINEDEBUG=warn-heap:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M vbscript.dll -T ../../.. -p
vbscript_test.exe.so run.c&& touch run.ok
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x at address
0x4004c1e4 (thread 0019), starting debugger...
Fails here under WINEDEBUG=warn-heap:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M vbscript.dll -T ../../.. -p
vbscript_test.exe.so run.c && touch run.ok
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x at address
0x4004c1e4 (thread 0019), starting debugger...
Backtrace:
=>0 0x4004c1e4 add_class_fu
Dan Kegel writes:
> Also be a bit more uniform about using U() instead of .u when accessing
> LowPart.
.u is better.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hey Dan,
On 09/15/2011 02:02 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> It might be just me, but I've seen five very strange test failures
> today out of about 30 build/test runs.
> Has anybody else noticed problems?
>
Does it happen if you try wine.git from before yesterday too?
~Maarten
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote:
> ---
> dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c | 148
> +-
> dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c | 16 ++---
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
Did make check work for you even? Marvin
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14262
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14271
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14270
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14266
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14265
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14269
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14261
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14260
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14259
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14256
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14255
Your paranoid android
27 matches
Mail list logo
