Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14214
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14215
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14213
Your paranoid android
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
[...]
> It shouldn't be a problem, this is the only place you can get a
> reference to these interfaces. It appears that once these interfaces
> were Deprecated they where removed from the SDK for msxml. See MSDN to
> show that they now depreca
Is there a way of doing what I want? Would using GetCursorInfo() to
discover if it's hidden, and then show it, work?
2011/9/13 Alexandre Julliard :
> Lucas Fialho Zawacki writes:
>
>> @@ -377,6 +377,12 @@ static INT_PTR CALLBACK ConfigureDevicesDlgProc(HWND
>> dialog, UINT uMsg, WPARAM w
>>
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> Well IMHO '\0' clearly indicates a char value, while 0 could be an
> integer (not in this obvioius example of course).
> This way you've a visual indicator/differentiator with nearby integer
> values assignments like "foo_integer_var = 0", and this could make the
> code
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14201
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14200
Your paranoid android
2011/9/13 Alexandre Julliard :
> Frédéric Delanoy writes:
>
>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void WCMD_HandleTildaModifiers(WCHAR **start, const
>> WCHAR *forVariable,
>> points to the variable just after the modifiers. Process modifiers
>> in a specific order, remembering there could be duplic
Hey,
On 09/12/2011 02:14 PM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug #28056 involving FreeBSD and OSS exhibits:
> warn:oss:AudioRenderClient_ReleaseBuffer write failed: 35 (Resource
> temporarily unavailable)
>
> My own notes from times as old as wine-1.1.8 show the same error with
test fails here?
xmlparser.c:41: Test failed: IXMLParser is not available (0x80040154)
make: *** [xmlparser.ok] Error 1
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: 78800: Subject: [2/2] msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface
To: d...@keg
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void WCMD_HandleTildaModifiers(WCHAR **start, const WCHAR
> *forVariable,
> points to the variable just after the modifiers. Process modifiers
> in a specific order, remembering there could be duplicates */
>modifierLen = l
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
+const char *debugstr_variant(const VARIANT *v)
+{
...
+case VT_I2:
+return wine_dbg_sprintf("{VT_I4: %d}", V_I2(v));
Should be "{VT_I2: %d}".
Octavian
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14182
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14180
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14181
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14184
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14183
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14185
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14186
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14188
Your paranoid android
Lucas Fialho Zawacki writes:
> @@ -377,6 +377,12 @@ static INT_PTR CALLBACK ConfigureDevicesDlgProc(HWND
> dialog, UINT uMsg, WPARAM w
> break;
> }
>
> +case WM_ACTIVATE:
> +/* Prevent mouse cursor from disappearing inside the dialog */
> +
22 matches
Mail list logo