Here's a little brain dump about speeding up builds.
I ran into two problems today:
- disk slowness
On a machine where builds were slow, the iozone benchmark
showed I/O was half or two thirds as fast as a better machine.
The slow system turned out to be ext3, whereas the fast ones were ext4
2011/9/9 Frédéric Delanoy
> Patch is OK, but for consistency, shouldn't the externals be put at
> the start of wcmdmain.c, just after the inbuilt[][]10]?
> This way, you could see directly which command is built-in, and which
> is external.
>
+ make it static const, since it's not used outside o
On 09/09/2011 08:24 PM, Luis C. Busquets Pérez wrote:
> I do not from which exact version of wine, whenever I run Civilization
> IV bryond the sword, losts of fixmes appear with the message
>
> fixme:d3d:resource_check_usage Unhandled usage flags 0x8.
>
> Since those fixmes did not appear before
I do not from which exact version of wine, whenever I run Civilization
IV bryond the sword, losts of fixmes appear with the message
fixme:d3d:resource_check_usage Unhandled usage flags 0x8.
Since those fixmes did not appear before I wonder if this is a bug.
I do not understand how it is that the
Hi Akihiro,
your patch does not apply here, perhaps it's slightly out of date?
patching file po/ja.po
Hunk #22 FAILED at 8231.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 8271 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #24 succeeded at 8347 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 8540 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 8549
Louis Lenders writes:
> +info = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, req_size);
> +
> +info->pwszName = (LPWSTR)(info + 1);
> +
> +if(!pguidServiceProvider)
> +{
> +lstrcpyW(info->pwszName, dp_providerW);
> +info->guid = CLSID_DP8SP_TCPIP;
> +}
> +else
> +{
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14097
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14098
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14100
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14101
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14103
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14102
Your paranoid android
On 09/09/11 14:54, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14096
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14095
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14094
Your paranoid android
André Hentschel writes:
> this improves the testresults, as some tests expect to get stubs through
> GetProcAddress but never use them.
These tests should be fixed (or the functions implemented), it shouldn't
be necessary to generate stubs for Winelib.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.or
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:31:10PM +0200, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> As I see that the PA team is preparing release candidates for 1.0, I
> wonder whether the Wine team communicated them the issues we face.
> Browsing open tickets http://pulseaudio.org/report/1 I found nothing obvio
Please, ignore this patch. It's overkill to check the bounding box
during every caret timer callback. I have found a better approach to
this by checking inside SetCaretPos/ShowCaret. That's because the
caret doesn't move by itself so it's useless to check everytime.
Thanks,
Bruno
--
universe* go
2011/9/9 Eric Pouech :
> WineDbg> set ! symbol_picker scoped
> will do what you want
> unfortunately, there's no way to store it as a default command (you can
> always use --command or --file on command line to help)
Thanks for that quick response!
Is there some doc on the internal commands, besi
Hi again,
Something that I still have trouble understanding is:
Why did I find out only 2 weeks ago that Ubuntu Lucid is affected?
Perhaps because I'm mostly using Intrepid which works better as far
as the dreaded Intel Xorg screen flicker, suspend/resume and audio
are concerned.
Why do th
Hi,
As I see that the PA team is preparing release candidates for 1.0, I
wonder whether the Wine team communicated them the issues we face.
Browsing open tickets http://pulseaudio.org/report/1 I found nothing obvious.
The PA bug, as I face it in Ubuntu Lucid, is not something that
happens randoml
2011/9/9 Alistair Leslie-Hughes :
> On 8/09/2011 8:35 PM, Marvin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
>> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might
>> be
>> wrong, but could you please double-check?
>> Full r
While debugging with winedbg, I sometimes stumble upon situations like
those (especially for widely used names)
Many symbols with name 'foo', choose the one you want ( to abort):
[1]: 0x1234567 foo in libwhatever.so.1
[2]: Local variable (in a register) of foo
=> 2
This can be cumbersome, e.g. wh
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14087
Your paranoid android
On 8/09/2011 8:35 PM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetai
Makes sense. I will send another patch once it is commited.
Christian
> Message du 09/09/11 09:53
> De : "Frédéric Delanoy"
> A : wine-devel@winehq.org
> Copie à : "Christian Costa"
> Objet : Re: [PATCH] cmd: Add help info for xcopy
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 09:16, Christian Costa wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 09:16, Christian Costa wrote:
>
> --- a/programs/cmd/builtins.c
> +++ b/programs/cmd/builtins.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static const WCHAR parmNoY[] = {'/','-','Y','\0'};
> static const WCHAR nullW[] = {'\0'};
>
> const WCHAR externals[][10] = {
> - {'A','T','T','R','I'
2011/9/9 Frédéric Delanoy :
> ---
> programs/cmd/builtins.c | 9 +
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
This patch depends on my other non-yet-commited goto patch (Avoid
rereading batch file for every call/goto executed)
Shouldn't probably have sent it yet.
Sorry for t
29 matches
Mail list logo