On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> It is a good advice. But that doesn't means one has to submit tests that
> don't make sense.
It seems like a simple comment describing the undocumented behavior
would help. I wrote some tests years ago (the details are not
important beca
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
> Any pointers on what's the set of winapi functions used to store and
> retrieve data in windows? I've searched MSDN for almost 30 minutes and
> no luck.
Try SetWindowLongPtr [1] / GetWindowLongPtr [2].
You probably want to use the W variants
> It doesn't make sense to pass the info as WM_INITDIALG parameter if it's
> going to be stored in global variables anyway. A better way would be to
> store this in the window info.
>
Any pointers on what's the set of winapi functions used to store and
retrieve data in windows? I've searched MSDN
2011/8/30 Martin Wilck :
> Hi Frédéric,
>
>> Some of those tests are already present in the test_builtins.cmd*
>> (e.g. the spacing tests)
>> You should probably integrated your tests in there: that makes it
>> easier to spot regressions and helps prevent tests duplication
>
> I can certainly do th
On 2011-08-30 08:33-0700 Dan Kegel wrote:
Today I discovered .. that the scanf family of functions was
introducing float (32-bit floating-point) noise into double (64-bit
floating-point) results.
I see it here, too:
$ sudo apt-get install mingw32
$ i586-mingw32msvc-gcc test_fscanf.c
$ echo "1
Hi all,
I've added a win7 sp1 testbot, it's currently in the extra vm's pool,
so it requires some extra actions to find it, but if you want to run
your tests against windows 7 sp1 with ie9 installed, you
should now be able to.
Happy testing!!
~Maarten
Le 30/08/2011 20:38, Peter Rosin a écrit :
Den 2011-08-30 20:18 skrev David Laight:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:43:41PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
double x;
while(fscanf(stdin, " %le ",&x) == 1)
You are using the wrong format, %le is for 'long double', this will
probably overwrite too mu
Den 2011-08-30 20:18 skrev David Laight:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:43:41PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> double x;
>> while(fscanf(stdin, " %le ", &x) == 1)
>
> You are using the wrong format, %le is for 'long double', this will
> probably overwrite too much data.
Nope, you are mistaken a
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:43:41PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> double x;
> while(fscanf(stdin, " %le ", &x) == 1)
You are using the wrong format, %le is for 'long double', this will
probably overwrite too much data.
David
--
David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:44:05PM +0200, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> Wine logs in Solaris can randomly crash Wine because it crashes on
> printf("%s", NULL)?
>
> I'm very surprised. I thought Solaris was one of the first machines - decades
> ago - where I observed "(null)" for NU
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Chitescu wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:57:30 am Reinier Napoles Martinez wrote:
>> >>This won't work. Simply doing a dlopen on the wine libraries won't get
>> >>your environment setup properly.
>>
>> what can i do then to setup the wine environment cor
We will be performing upgrades and maintenance to the WineHQ.org server
starting at 1800 CDT on Wednesday August 31st.
This process will take the server off-line for about an hour. The
Websites (www,appdb,forums), and Mailing lists, and Git will be off-line
during this period.
-Newman
2011/8/30 Frédéric Delanoy :
> You don't test the result of your 'mkdir "foo:"'. You can't know from
> the test whether the dir was created and removed, or never existed.
That's the whole point! I tested in cmd prompt on a Windows XP machine
(and I assume all Windows versions act the same in this
Jérôme Gardou writes:
> Anyway, I've looked into this a bit, and it seems that the place to
> write a proper test is rpcrt4 test suite.
> While writing the test would per se be very easy, the problem won't
> show up if -Oif isn't set on the tested idl file. Adding this to the
> EXTRAIDLFLAGS vari
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:19, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> --
> Issue was fixed by 94d2312fe2fdd77669ac826afa24e6821571ebba. This test is to
> prevent future regressions, as suggested by Frederic.
>
> Windows doesn't accept colons in directory names, so it will just fail on the
> mkdir/rmdir commands
Try oprofile instead.
( A really old intro is at http://www.winehq.org/wwn/249#oprofile%20&%20Wine )
Le 30/08/2011 17:50, Jérôme Gardou a écrit :
Hello.
Maybe the comment isn't clear enough.
The ranges are correctly output into the format string, but the offset
of each output is lost during the processing. For instance, declaring
a function like this one :
DWORD Test(
[in, range(0, 102
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ben Peddell wrote:
> A modification of the timestamp patch from Bernhard Loos should help us
> find what calls are taking the longest.
>
Speaking of that, I've been trying to compile cmd tests with profiling (-pg,
for use with gprof), but no luck. I added -pg to b
On 08/30/11 10:33, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2011-08-30 08:20+1000 Ben Peddell wrote:
>> Some things I have seen while investigating:
>>
>> I created a program which had a startup that immediately called
>> ExitProcess to attempt to eliminate most of the initialization of the
>> process being forke
Hello.
Maybe the comment isn't clear enough.
The ranges are correctly output into the format string, but the offset
of each output is lost during the processing. For instance, declaring a
function like this one :
DWORD Test(
[in, range(0, 1024)] DWORD dwParam1,
[in, range(0, 255)] DW
Hi Bruno,
> The SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS message on windows takes parameters as
> miliseconds, on some other systems there are the equivalent
> TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL which takes the parameters as seconds. To
> solve this there is a division by 1000 on wine source code but the
> problem is that valu
Dan Kegel writes:
> Alexandre wrote:
>> I don't think we need to rename it.
>
> $ which view
> /usr/bin/view
> $ view --version
> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:33:18)
> ...
>
> I'm pretty sure view has been taken for many years as
> the way to invoke vi in read-only m
> Today I discovered .. that the scanf family of functions was
> introducing float (32-bit floating-point) noise into double (64-bit
> floating-point) results.
I see it here, too:
$ sudo apt-get install mingw32
$ i586-mingw32msvc-gcc test_fscanf.c
$ echo "1.1e+01
1.1e+00
1.1e-01
1.1e-02
1.1e-03
1
Alexandre wrote:
> I don't think we need to rename it.
$ which view
/usr/bin/view
$ view --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:33:18)
...
I'm pretty sure view has been taken for many years as
the way to invoke vi in read-only mode.
- Dan
On 08/30/2011 04:05 AM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
> For instance, Scott Ritchie's example is not unusual:
> + * If lpszStr is Null, returns how long a formatted string would be.
> This is a very common pattern. Probably MSDN forgot to mention it.
> Expect apps to use that when they
On 30 August 2011 12:57, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +static DWORD make_bitmask(DWORD count)
> +{
> +DWORD ret = 0;
> +for (count--; count != ~0U; count--) ret |= 1 << count;
> +return ret;
> +}
You could probably do something like "return count ? ~0U >> (32 - count) : 0;"
In this specif
This discussion is related to the test failing in bug 21271:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21271
The SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS message on windows takes parameters as
miliseconds, on some other systems there are the equivalent
TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL which takes the parameters as seconds. To
s
Hi,
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>What you do want to test is:
>- the de jure API (as documented), and
>- the de facto API (as used by applications
You plead for operational profile testing. I say that the API "as
used by applications" is unknown to me because the 10 apps out
there don't send me
Jérôme Gardou writes:
> @@ -1418,6 +1418,11 @@ static var_t *declare_var(attr_list_t *attrs,
> decl_spec_t *decl_spec, const decl
>type_t *func_type = decl ? decl->func_type : NULL;
>type_t *type = decl_spec->type;
>
> + /* In case of a range attribute, duplicate the type to keep trac
André Hentschel suggested:
>Should stop the crash on Solaris and maybe others
>-trace("parent_data = (%p) -> %s\n", parent_data, (char *)parent_data);
>+trace("parent_data (%p) -> %s\n", parent_data, parent_data ? (char
>*)parent_data : "(null)");
This is sooo backwards. You don't want t
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13830
Your paranoid android
André Hentschel writes:
> i think wineview is a better name for installation
> this also merges the resources
I don't think we need to rename it. Also the accelerators are supposed
to be translatable.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 08/30/11 11:43, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:57:30 am Reinier Napoles Martinez wrote:
> >>This won't work. Simply doing a dlopen on the wine libraries won't get
> >>your environment setup properly.
>
> what can i do then to setup the wine environment correctly
> and use the wine libraries from fpc.
> thanks
Essen
On Monday 29 August 2011 21:54:52 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Technically that's true for this specific function since the result is only
> used by our code and never the application. Yet I prefer to keep the
> memset for consistency with other code that handles DDSURFACEDESC(2)
> structures.
I tried
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 00:34, Martin Wilck wrote:
> This patch adds some tests for command line parsing and treatment
> of quotes and special characters in the command line and in program
> names and parameters. The .exp file was created using Win XP.
> Follow-up patches will fix the marked TODOs
2011/8/30 Octavian Voicu :
> 2011/8/29 Octavian Voicu
>>
>> Alexandre already committed the patch, so if native passes the test I can
>> send a test for the next iteration. On the other hand, if native chokes on
>> the colon, then we shouldn't add any testcases. If it works, might also
>> throw a
37 matches
Mail list logo
