I lied. There's no way other than sending the patch to wine-patches
at the moment, sorry.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Try submitting them to https://testbot.winehq.org/
> I think it'll pick them up from there
> - Dan
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Norbert Lataille
The bot found a real problem again in someone's patch today.
Mail is not yet automated, so I let the author know by hand.
Because several people asked whether they could run
headless slaves, I added headless support; now if
DISPLAY is not set, the bot won't try to run any
tests known to fail with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 22.08.2011 um 00:28 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 21 August 2011 23:25, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> + * provided strided data has ovwritten pretty much the entire vertex and
> Typo.
>> + * and index stream related states */
> Missing punctuat
On 21 August 2011 23:25, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> + * provided strided data has ovwritten pretty much the entire vertex and
Typo.
> + * and index stream related states */
Missing punctuation.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>> token.c:1319:87: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘)’ token
>> token.c:1319:87: error: expected statement before ‘)’ token
>>
>> http://buildbot.kegel.com/builders/runtests/builds/110
>
> Right, not sure how it happened. Thanks.
>
> By the way, am
On 8/21/2011 22:36, Dan Kegel wrote:
Doesn't build here:
reply->user_len = FIELD_OFFSET( TOKEN_GROUPS,
Groups[group_count] ) + sid_size);
token.c: In function ‘req_get_token_groups’:
token.c:1319:87: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘)’ token
token.c:1319:87: error: expected statement before ‘
Doesn't build here:
reply->user_len = FIELD_OFFSET( TOKEN_GROUPS,
Groups[group_count] ) + sid_size);
token.c: In function ‘req_get_token_groups’:
token.c:1319:87: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘)’ token
token.c:1319:87: error: expected statement before ‘)’ token
http://buildbot.kegel.com/buil
Try submitting them to https://testbot.winehq.org/
I think it'll pick them up from there
- Dan
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Norbert Lataille wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I have a question for you.
> These issues are fixed locally thanks to unit tests, and I am preparing a
> new patch set with bugfix
Hi Dan,
I have a question for you.
These issues are fixed locally thanks to unit tests, and I am preparing a
new patch set with bugfix & cleaning. Is there any way (besides sending
patches to wine-patches) to issue a buildbot job ? I remember reading
something about accounts on the wiki, but I am
Hi,
I see what you mean about buffer_unload(). I understand you are saying that
this patch is not "complete" (in the sense HASDESC flag being cleared this
means this is not a proper way to flag such buffers), not that what the
patch is trying to do is a non-existing issue.
I will propose an updat
10 matches
Mail list logo