On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:33, Giovanni Ongaro
wrote:
> I am working oon a xlive patch can you tell me how to finf dll ordinal
> functions by using winedump i am tryiing specifically to find how much
> parameters xlive 5282 has
>
> Can you help me?
>From the patch:
+/* This DLL is completely undo
On 08/17/2011 10:31 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 17.08.2011 22:18, schrieb Juan Lang:
>> Hi André,
>>
>>> http://domain\user:passw...@server.com:8080 makes it visible that it's
>>> intended to get the last colon
>>
>> What about http://domain\user:passw...@server.com? password isn't the
>> por
Am 17.08.2011 22:18, schrieb Juan Lang:
> Hi André,
>
>> http://domain\user:passw...@server.com:8080 makes it visible that it's
>> intended to get the last colon
>
> What about http://domain\user:passw...@server.com? password isn't the
> port number.
> --Juan
in case password is not a number a
Hi André,
> http://domain\user:passw...@server.com:8080 makes it visible that it's
> intended to get the last colon
What about http://domain\user:passw...@server.com? password isn't the
port number.
--Juan
I brought up the proof-of-concept buildbot-based patchwatcher
on two old PCs here; its status page is http://buildbot.kegel.com/
It has caught one real problem so far this morning.
to-do list:
- make cleaner script and doc for adding a new slave
- make it start automatically after reboot
- sandbox
On 17/08/2011 15:19, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Hi Nowres,
did you run the regedit tests,
cd programs/regedit/tests
make test
after that change? Here it fails with
regedit.c:384: Test failed: regedit not available, skipping regedit tests
( log at
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hi Nowres,
> did you run the regedit tests,
> cd programs/regedit/tests
> make test
> after that change? Here it fails with
> regedit.c:384: Test failed: regedit not available, skipping regedit tests
> ( log at http://buildbot.kegel.com/bui
Hi Nowres,
did you run the regedit tests,
cd programs/regedit/tests
make test
after that change? Here it fails with
regedit.c:384: Test failed: regedit not available, skipping regedit tests
( log at http://buildbot.kegel.com/builders/runtests/builds/2 )
You might need to fully implement th
On 17/08/2011 14:42, Dan Kegel wrote:
Frédéric Delanoy wote:
Nowres Rafid wrote:
how can I generate the expected file (.exp)?
It already exists in the source tree
I think Nowres meant, how can he update the .exp file
to match the expected output of his new test.
The answer is: run the new te
Frédéric Delanoy wote:
> Nowres Rafid wrote:
>> how can I generate the expected file (.exp)?
> It already exists in the source tree
I think Nowres meant, how can he update the .exp file
to match the expected output of his new test.
The answer is: run the new test, save its output,
and add it to t
2011/8/17 Nowres Rafid :
> On 17/08/2011 14:02, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 19:14, Nowres Rafid
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> fixing cd ..@space@
>>>
>>> please ignore the previous patch.
>>
>> You didn't include any test in your patch.
>> All patches including a fix must have tests
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 19:14, Nowres Rafid wrote:
> fixing cd ..@space@
>
> please ignore the previous patch.
You didn't include any test in your patch.
All patches including a fix must have tests confirming the bug is fixed
Brian Vincent wrote:
>It looks like I got one "test failed" followed by an ok one on the second run.
>capture.c:548: Test failed: Master volume wasn't 1: 0.769175
I'm not familiar with the volume test, but past winmm experience is that native
may
have remembered your previous volume setting (winmm
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:24:18PM +, Nowres Rafid wrote:
> -reg_file = fopen(realname, "r");
> +
> + reg_file = fopen(realname, "r");
The file uses spaces for indenting. Please be consistent and don't use
tabs. This is true elsewhere, to
On 17 August 2011 22:21, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 08:27 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> I also notice the pages have been renamed (so instead of deb = ubuntu,
>> ubuntu and debian are named correctly and unambiguously). I would like
>> to voice my approval as former maintainer of the Debian pa
On 07/30/2011 08:27 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> I also notice the pages have been renamed (so instead of deb = ubuntu,
> ubuntu and debian are named correctly and unambiguously). I would like
> to voice my approval as former maintainer of the Debian packages, as
> token as that may seem at this stage.
>
Luis,
Louis Lenders wrote:
> This is part of bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28008
a line length of 400+ chars kinda stretches what is acceptable. Please
try to stick to a length of 100 in dpnet; that's the Wine preferred line
length and also what I used during the COM cleanup in dpnet.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2011 12:16:55 Michael Mc Donnell wrote:
>> Stefan thought a previous version of this looked ok, and I haven't had
>> any negative feedback on this version either.
> The 104 kb / 3000 line patch is rather big, you could p
18 matches
Mail list logo
