Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
James McKenzie wrote: > That is correct. The two are distinctly different and no further > reports of running compliance tests against Windows9x should be > recorded. However, insuring what functionality we do have in Wine for > running antiquated Windows9x/ME programs should remain, if poss

Re: [PATCH 7/8] ddraw: Fix SetTexture reference count behaviour.

2011-08-07 Thread Stefan Dösinger
On Monday 08 August 2011 00:26:38 Ričardas Barkauskas wrote: > +hr = wined3d_device_get_texture(This->wined3d_device, stage, &wined3d_texture); This will cause problems when the application is recording a stateblock. In this case set_texture will apply the texture in the update stateblock and

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread James McKenzie
On 8/7/11 6:55 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: James McKenzie wrote: There are functions that vary between Windows9x/ME and WindowsNT and their ilk. People do use Wine to support Windows9x/ME programs that are not supported, anymore, by current Windows. When we make changes to functionality, it

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
James McKenzie wrote: > There are functions that vary between Windows9x/ME and WindowsNT and > their ilk. People do use Wine to support Windows9x/ME programs that are > not supported, anymore, by current Windows. When we make changes to > functionality, it is a 'good thing' to make sure we d

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread James McKenzie
On 8/7/11 1:01 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: James McKenzie wrote: what happened to the w9x test bots? I'd like them to run some kernel32 tests. Testbot says "offline". They were hosted at Gé's house. Testbot can no longer reach them. Are there plans to 'revive' them? There is no point in

Re: [1/2] user32/tests: Test what happens to a WM_QUIT posted to a window that gets destroyed.

2011-08-07 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Marvin wrote: [...] > === W7PROX64 (64 bit msg) === > Timeout As far as I can tell this timeout ocurred before the test I added got a chance to run. Also I have done a rerun on TestBot and it went ok (the test I added corresponds to the 10240 and 10244 lines): https://testbot

Re: GSoC-2011: Implement Missing Mesh Functions in Wine’s D3DX9

2011-08-07 Thread Michael Mc Donnell
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote: >> Btw. those FIXMEs might produce a lot of messages (one per vertex). Is >> there good way to limit the number of messages? > A common way is something like this > > { >    static BOOL once = false; >    if (!once) >    { >        FIXME("Repo

Re: Printing fixme's once (was: Re: GSoC-2011: Implement Missing Mesh Functions in Wine’s D3DX9)

2011-08-07 Thread Michael Mc Donnell
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > Stefan wrote: >> I think there was once a discussion about a FIXME_ONCE macro that took care >> of this. not sure what happened with that idea. > > Judging by > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/45ead7fe85e7107de91bd79a8ceeb1cb17

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey James, On 08/07/2011 05:12 AM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 8/3/11 7:10 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> On 08/01/2011 07:12 PM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> what happened to the w9x test bots? I'd like them to run some kernel32 >>> tests. >>> Testbot says "offline".

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-07 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
James McKenzie wrote: > >> what happened to the w9x test bots? I'd like them to run some kernel32 > >> tests. > >> Testbot says "offline". > >> > > They were hosted at Gé's house. Testbot can no longer reach them. > > > Are there plans to 'revive' them? There is no point in that, it's been dis