On 8/3/11 7:10 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
On 08/01/2011 07:12 PM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
Hi,
what happened to the w9x test bots? I'd like them to run some kernel32 tests.
Testbot says "offline".
They were hosted at Gé's house. Testbot can no longer reach them.
Are there
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Sven Baars wrote:
> Alexandre turned it down last time:
>
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-January/088123.html
Ah, foo, now I remember. Thanks...
- Dan
On 06-08-2011 at 11:12 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
There are many places in the wine source that use a static
to print a fixme just once. Here's a simple macro that
combines declaring and testing the static.
Thoughts?
Hi Dan,
Alexandre turned it down last time:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine
There are many places in the wine source that use a static
to print a fixme just once. Here's a simple macro that
combines declaring and testing the static.
Thoughts?
diff --git a/include/wine/debug.h b/include/wine/debug.h
index ba6fabe..3112401 100644
--- a/include/wine/debug.h
+++ b/include/w
Stefan wrote:
> I think there was once a discussion about a FIXME_ONCE macro that took care
> of this. not sure what happened with that idea.
Judging by
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/45ead7fe85e7107de91bd79a8ceeb1cb17e4f71d,
Alexandre's preferred idiom is
static BOOL fixm
On 08/06/2011 08:38 AM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.wineh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 06.08.2011 um 15:24 schrieb Michael Mc Donnell:
> I can't find any definitions of UBYTE except for one in
> dlls/itss/lzx.c. The BYTE is already defined [1] as a being unsigned
> so isn't that ok?
Oh, I thought BYTE is signed, and I thought I used
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13371
Your paranoid android
On 08/06/2011 06:59 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 06:54:48AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/shlwapi/tests/string.c | 15 +++
>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>
>> diff --git a/dlls/shlwapi/tests/string.c b/dlls/shlwapi/tes
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 06:54:48AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> ---
> dlls/shlwapi/tests/string.c | 15 +++
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/dlls/shlwapi/tests/string.c b/dlls/shlwapi/tests/string.c
> index 68028d7..ecc58cc 100644
> --- a/dll
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> A proper fix would be a patch to configure.ac to detect the correct
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH for the target architecture. There is also a proposed change
> [1] to pkgconfig to allow you to specify the host system type for
> cross-compiles, but I'm n
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> src.visrect.left = src.x = 0;
> src.visrect.top= src.y = 0;
>
These two lines become redundant after your patch.
Octavian
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso <
a_villa...@palosanto.com> wrote:
> El 02/08/11 17:38, Octavian Voicu escribió:
>
> When building a 32-bit wine in a 64-bit build environment with
>> default glib headers (gstreamer uses glib.h), glib 64-bit types
>> (such as gint64 and guint
13 matches
Mail list logo
