On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:01 +1000, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
-@ stub TraceMessage
-@ stub TraceMessageVa
+@ varargs TraceMessage(long long ptr long)
+@ stdcall TraceMessageVa(long long ptr long ptr)
These functions take a TRACEHANDLE as the first argument which is
an int64.
Hello. I need some help here.
Before commiting the ConfigureDevices patches tried to add a couple
simple tests for the function, the problem is that I now have to test
a dialog. What is the best way to do it? I'm thinking of creating
another thread and sending the desired messages to the dialog, i
On Monday 01 August 2011 19:12:44 joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what happened to the w9x test bots? I'd like them to run some kernel32
> tests. Testbot says "offline".
I think we killed w9x testing a few months ago
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
Mariusz Pluciński writes:
> +KNOWN_FOLDER(FOLDERID_AddNewPrograms, NO_CSIDL,
>"AddNewProgramsFolder", KF_CATEGORY_VIRTUAL,
> GUID_NULL,NULL,
>
> "::{21EC2020-3AEA-1069-A
Hi,
Andrew Eikum replied:
>> - Questionable use of BUFFERFLAGS_SILENT in WOD_PushData. When no data
>>is available now, the buffer is flooded with silence, hence data
>>submitted shortly afterwards will be delayed by as much (PulseAudio
>>will accumulate 2 seconds of buffer data...),
Hi,
I've a couple of mmdevapi tests that I could put into submittable
form soon, however there's one big problem: There are three different
backends (ALSA, OSS, MacOS) and each one needs a different set of todo_wine.
How to deal with that?
In the past, when I worked alone (e.g. on the MCI), I si
Jay Yang writes:
> Added TRACE statements and removed some stray comments
> ---
> dlls/shell32/Makefile.in |1 +
> dlls/shell32/composite_cmenu.c | 275
>
Please put that in some existing files, there are already way too many
files in shell32.
On 1 August 2011 14:08, Michael Mc Donnell wrote:
>> With the bitfields I'm not sure about stuff like endianess. My gut feeling
>> would be to use bitmasks and shifts to separate a DWORD instead, but
>> bitfields
>> certainly look nicer. Beyond that endianess is a somewhat academic
>> considerati
On 8/2/11 11:50 AM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13166
Your paranoid android
10 matches
Mail list logo