On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Keith Curtis wrote:
> None of the Linux kernel developers are paid by Linus nor can be fired by
> him. Linus never forces people to respond to his mails or to work on
> anything. What has happened is that the team has realized that having goals
> and leadership has
Hi guys.
Now that all the initial patches are in I have several smaller tasks
to work on as listed here
http://lfzawacki.heroku.com/wine/published/Road+Map and hopefully
they're more straightforward. I've already started working on getting
EnumDevicesBySemantics correct with joysticks and the pas
I bring up Linus because he can focus efforts. You don't need Linus. You
just need the same result -- focused efforts. There is another name for this
concept -- teams. Maybe WINE needs sub-teams?
I assure you that the problem isn't for lack of resources. I know you feel
busy and perhaps that I'm j
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12210
Your paranoid android
On 7/4/11 7:50 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
None of the Linux kernel developers are paid by Linus nor can be fired
by him. Linus never forces people to respond to his mails or to work
on anything. What has happened is that the team has realized that
having goals and leadership has led to good result
None of the Linux kernel developers are paid by Linus nor can be fired by
him. Linus never forces people to respond to his mails or to work on
anything. What has happened is that the team has realized that having goals
and leadership has led to good results, and Linus is a good leader, and so
they
Am 04.07.2011 16:29, schrieb Vincas Miliūnas:
> Changelog:
Hi,
even if you have 10 patches, maybe first try to get the tests in. Divide and
Conquer!
That's at least a bit less mess on wine-patches for now, and is easier for you
and AJ i guess.
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
On 07/04/2011 02:15 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 04.07.2011 20:08, schrieb max:
1. Does it run on Windows? iTunes is an Apple product and it could be that it
has
been intentionally implemented so that it does not run on Microsoft's OS.
Why then providing a Windowsversion??? :)
So you are
Am 04.07.2011 20:08, schrieb max:
> 1. Does it run on Windows? iTunes is an Apple product and it could be that it
> has
> been intentionally implemented so that it does not run on Microsoft's OS.
Why then providing a Windowsversion??? :)
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
On 4 July 2011 15:32, Juan Lang wrote:
> But really, what are we talking about? Talk is cheap. Code isn't.
> Your contributions are welcome.
In principle yes, but having worked for Microsoft complicates that a bit.
On 07/02/2011 03:46 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi;
Here is a rant about iTunes:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/229398-2/day_3_dude_wheres_my_itunes.html
You guys are doing great, but I think it would be better if you were to work
more in priority order. There are 200M devices, last
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12187
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12185
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12186
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12183
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12188
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12184
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12189
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12182
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12181
Your paranoid android
Hi Keith,
> WINE in general does many things, and you've got a big team now. Your
> contributor list shows 1250 and you've got 2M lines of code.
Few of these contributors remain active. Most had small
contributions. The total number of contributors obviously can only
increase over time, but the
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:01:31PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 13:37, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> >> 2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger :
> >> > Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> >> >> export WINED
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 13:37, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>> 2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger :
>> > Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
>> >> export WINEDEBUG=+heap
>> > WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> 2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger :
> > Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> >> export WINEDEBUG=+heap
> > WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the debug output
>
> I get the following:
> batch.c:306: runni
Hi Alexandre,
Please don't apply those patches yet, I just noticed that they cause some
issues with backbuffer offscreen rendering.
Thanks,
Stefan
On Saturday 02 July 2011 11:57:22 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> This patch is unmodified, patch 2 moves the bulk of the new code into
> context.c rather
Hi André,
On 07/03/11 13:35, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
> dlls/uuid/uuid.c |1 +
> include/shobjidl.idl |2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/uuid/uuid.c b/dlls/uuid/uuid.c
> index d4ad2ae..0ad0425 100644
> --- a/dlls/uuid/uuid.c
> +++ b/dll
2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger :
> Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
>> export WINEDEBUG=+heap
> WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the debug output
I get the following:
batch.c:306: running TEST_BUILTINS.CMD test...
batch.c:215: Test failed: unexpected char 0x73 posi
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Dylan Smith wrote:
> The latest ConvertPointRepsToAdjacency patches look good.
Good I'll sit on a bit and send ConvertAdjacencyToPointReps to
wine-patches in the meantime.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> export WINEDEBUG=+heap
WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the debug output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOEXvvAAoJEN0/YqbE
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 09:31:52PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm in the process of writing a couple of cmd tests (on top of master,
> not of my currently pending patches), and I at times have problems
> where none of the tests is actually performed, but the test suite
> still
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 04:44, Keith Curtis wrote:
> <...>
>
> In general, people can work where they want, but it is better if some work
> is prioritized.
Well indeed volunteers work where they want, but also on the parts
they're good at (not everybody is interested, and if they're are, they
can
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:49:44AM +0300, Alex Stanev wrote:
>
> ---
> dlls/advapi32/advapi.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/advapi32/advapi.c b/dlls/advapi32/advapi.c
> index e135fa5..7025a21 100644
> --- a/dlls/advapi32/advapi.c
> +++ b/dll
32 matches
Mail list logo
