Hi André,
On 19/06/2011 1:52 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/shdocvw/taskbarlist.c | 74 ---
include/shobjidl.idl | 15 +
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Can you please provide a test case to show that this int
Hi,
by mistake i linked a wrong bug to FAR Manager:
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15928
Could someone remove a link from FAR to bug 27406, please?
Thanks, W.
Can't reproduce as this seem to only work with wine64. Perhaps there's
some issue with the headers? Code compiles fine under wine32.
On 06/18/2011 11:50 AM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good a
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11808
Your paranoid android
I can't speak about the conceptual correctness of this patch, although my gut
feeling says that you're right.
You don't need wined3d_wndproc_mutex_(un)lock. Just use EnterCriticalSection /
LeaveCriticalSection directly. wined3d_mutex_lock exists because it is
exported from wined3d.
On Friday 1
