On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:57:40PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
> On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
> >environment and once inthe 64bit one.
> >
> Maybe Wine can look into some sort of merge process to build both
> and at
On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
environment and once inthe 64bit one.
Maybe Wine can look into some sort of merge process to build both and at
runtime select one or the other? I don't know if this is possible, I'm
jus
On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
environment and once inthe 64bit one.
Maybe Wine can look into some sort of merge process to build both and at
runtime select one or the other? I don't know if this is possible, I'm
jus
On 05/21/2011 08:20 AM, Ove Kåven wrote:
> Den 19. mai 2011 20:58, skrev Scott Ritchie:
>> A side effect of this change, however, is the current build daemons ONLY
>> have packages for one architecture. This means that, at build time, you
>> won't be able to pull in the 32-bit packages on a 64-bit
Den 19. mai 2011 20:58, skrev Scott Ritchie:
> A side effect of this change, however, is the current build daemons ONLY
> have packages for one architecture. This means that, at build time, you
> won't be able to pull in the 32-bit packages on a 64-bit build daemon.
Well, I don't see the problem.
