http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-April/089585.html
(I lost the original mail - along with a bunch of others)
I'm confused as to what the .po files are for.
ise/ize will be correct if the .rc file default is British English.
Without updating the .po file for US English I don't see
Morning all,
Could someone far smarter than me please take a look at the attached patch?
Windows XP 64-bit runs NT kernel 5.2, whereas 32-bit runs 5.1. Any
64-bit app expecting XP 64-bit will fail (such as IE8 for NT 5.2).
The patch lets the installer continue, but I'm not sure if it is enough
Some minor things regarding listview.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> ---
> dlls/inetcpl.cpl/security.c | 131
> +++
> 1 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> +static void add_zone_to_listview(secdlg_data *sd,
I was taking a look at
http://wiki.jswindle.com/index.php/Debugging_Wine
to see how to debug wine with gdb,
and there was reference to starting up gdb using wine-pthread, but I see no
such executable now.
I can attach gdb after it starts to run, but then do not get all the symbol
information.
On 04/11/2011 05:25 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
Actually, I took a look at the benchmark you said this is supposed to
help. It doesn't seem to use offscreen rendering at all.
I re-benched and I can confirm; context_apply_fbo_state() is no longer a
significant bottleneck in the batch size tests. Ho
Hello,
there is something wrong with WRT result page/parser [1] (or with TestBot
too) since yesterday.
All tests' results from TestBot are shown as "skipped by user request",
eg. for XP [2].
Results from physical machines are present, currently only one
(af-xpsp3-nv) which shows 12 failures.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 07:13, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>> The problem is that I won't be able to patch anything for a couple of
>> weeks cause I don't have build system with me, so please commit
>> reverting patch if a fix is not obvious.
>>
> Does th
On 12 April 2011 07:13, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> The problem is that I won't be able to patch anything for a couple of
> weeks cause I don't have build system with me, so please commit
> reverting patch if a fix is not obvious.
>
Does the attached patch make sense to you?
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10449
Your paranoid android
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Peter Urbanec wrote:
[...]
> So, I had a quick look at the wine source and found a comment in
> dlls/msvcrt/cppexcept.c that says:
>
> /* CxxFrameHandler is not supported on non-i386 */
>
> I don't think that this is quite right, given that Microsoft's MFC80.DLL
> attempts to
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 01:19:12 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> You can't just resend this unmodified if you're leaving buffer creation in.
Well, that one has a few adjustments, e.g. the removal of the goto. And I am
pretty sure I created a context for buffer_create_buffer_object, for some
reason
that'
11 matches
Mail list logo