Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9650
Your paranoid android.
An updated attempt at the mmap override patch that I previously sent. This
version properly uses a signed type for the mmap wrapper (as off_t/off64_t are
signed types), fixes a few things with the munmap wrapper relating to
truncated and sliced file_views, and implements a mremap wrapper for Lin
Hi,
attached is a hacky patch which forwards the reflection interface from
d3dcompiler_41 to d3dcompiler_43.
I have a question to that implementation:
DEFINE_GUID is used twice (dlls/dxguid/dx10guid.c and
dlls/d3dcompiler_41/reflection.c) which could be bad. But the define was
removed from
On 02/27/2011 05:55 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
The other reason is that a decent documentation of the Windows API would
be huge; look at how much information there is on MSDN, and that's still
incomplete. It's completely impossible to maintain something of that
size in the middle of the sourc
Juan Lang writes:
> +if (ret)
> +{
> +ret = FALSE;
> +num = strtoulW(ptr, &nextPtr, 10);
> +if (nextPtr > ptr && *nextPtr == ':' && num <= 59)
> +{
> +ptr = nextPtr + 1;
> +st.wMinute = (WORD)num;
> +ret = TRUE;
> +
Jacek Caban writes:
> On 3/3/11 2:45 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Jacek Caban writes:
>>
>>> +/* FIXME: Implement in more generic and safe way */
>>> +for(ptr = name; *ptr&& isdigitW(*ptr); ptr++)
>>> +i = i*10 + (*ptr-'0');
>> What's wrong with strtoulW?
>
> We don't want t
On 3/3/11 2:45 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Caban writes:
+/* FIXME: Implement in more generic and safe way */
+for(ptr = name; *ptr&& isdigitW(*ptr); ptr++)
+i = i*10 + (*ptr-'0');
What's wrong with strtoulW?
We don't want to use strings like "+1" or with leasing sp
Jacek Caban writes:
> +/* FIXME: Implement in more generic and safe way */
> +for(ptr = name; *ptr && isdigitW(*ptr); ptr++)
> +i = i*10 + (*ptr-'0');
What's wrong with strtoulW?
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Op 02-03-11 18:52, Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
>>
>> Changelog:
>> * mountmgr.sys: start detecting USB devices
>
> I'd love to get this kind of work in, but since libhal has been deprecated
> for a while, wouldn't it be better
Hi Damjan,
Op 02-03-11 18:52, Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
Changelog:
* mountmgr.sys: start detecting USB devices
I'd love to get this kind of work in, but since libhal has been
deprecated for a while, wouldn't it be better to use libudev directly
instead of expanding our usage of libhal?
Che
Peter Urbanec writes:
> Could someone please explain to me what's going on here? Quick look at
> the code indicates that there is a 4MB heap used for "views" (I have
> no idea what these are) and presumably that heap is exhausted. Is this
> likely a resource leak somewhere?
Not necessarily. The
[Please do not exclude wine-devel when repying]
Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> > That's precisely my point. How many users are prepared to compile Wine
> > from source when they report a bug with such a Wine build, and
> > somebody
> > asks them to either use a package without custom patches or compi
Juan Lang wrote:
> +if (!expirationFound)
> +{
> +SYSTEMTIME st;
> +
> +/* With no known age, default to 10 minutes until expiration. */
> +GetSystemTime(&st);
> +if (st.wMinute < 50)
> +st.wMinute += 10;
> +else
> +{
> +
On 01/03/11 17:13, John Klehm wrote:
Nice find on this code path being able to run without loading xinput.
It was as a result of a user sending me some crash logs. I never managed
to reproduce this issue. I don't even have access to a tablet to test.
My patch was pretty much a result of "NUL
14 matches
Mail list logo
