Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8921
Your paranoid android.
I've been going through the Wine API documentation and there seem to be
some things that I think should be changed:
- There are references to Wine documents that do not include links to
the pages. The links should be included.
- Some 'implementation' sections claim that the API is not declare
No feedback and apparently no interest in the WineAPI project on
SourceForge. Understandable since there is now a WineAPI on the regular
Wine Wiki. Unless someone objects, I'm going to ask that it be shutdown
on SourceForge.
Max
On 02/04/2011 06:25 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 18:22, Igor Egorov wrote:
This is my first patch, not sure if I done all right.
I didn't look at the actual change, but:
mode change 100644 => 100755 dlls/kernel32/process.c
doesn't seem necessary to me.
Yes, thanks, I r
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 18:22, Igor Egorov wrote:
> This is my first patch, not sure if I done all right.
I didn't look at the actual change, but:
> mode change 100644 => 100755 dlls/kernel32/process.c
doesn't seem necessary to me.
--
-Austin
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8891
Your paranoid android.
I've got a Debian binary package configured. A wrapper script is
installed in /usr/bin that invokes wine on the winegcc-built shared
library that implements the program. The shared library is installed in
/usr/lib and then ldconfig is run during the installation process.
The shared library b
James McKenzie wrote:
> Actually, the latest patch is what I don't want reused.
This one?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2011-January/098431.html
Why don't you want it reused?
> And no, you don't put it in the LGPL until it is committed,
That's interesting. I always thought it wa
On 2/4/11 1:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
James McKenzie wrote:
Since my Mac is dying I have decided to return to the Windows world.
Please pull any and all patches. I have envoked the right to copyright
and none of my code can or will be used in Wine.
Sorry to see you go, but... why would you want
Dan Kegel writes:
> I guess I could do "sleep 5" but that's an awful kludge.
> Probably I'll go back to letting the ugly virtual desktop pop up.
> So, what's the proper way to run one app under wine *without* X
> while letting other apps run wine *with* X?
You can't, but winepath shouldn't be po
James McKenzie wrote:
> Since my Mac is dying I have decided to return to the Windows world.
>
> Please pull any and all patches. I have envoked the right to copyright
> and none of my code can or will be used in Wine.
Sorry to see you go, but... why would you want to prohibit people from
using y
So, I've got this shell script that does something like
h=`wine winepath -w $HOME`
...
wine autohotkey run-setup.ahk
Works great. However, if the user has selected to run
wine in a virtual desktop, running winepath will start up
and then shut down the virtual desktop, which is visually annoy
Den 2011-02-04 20:36 skrev Peter Rosin:
> Den 2011-02-04 17:41 skrev André Hentschel:
>> % and / both lead to external dependencies here...
>> maybe the euclidean algorithm helps, because -Os would need ugly changes to
>> configure i guess.
>>
>
> Finding gcd is a bit over the top...
>
> How abo
Den 2011-02-04 17:41 skrev André Hentschel:
> Am 04.02.2011 17:26, schrieb Marcus Meissner:
>> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:51:46PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
>>> Am 04.02.2011 16:31, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
André Hentschel writes:
> +unsigned int wld_modulo( const unsigned int
Am 04.02.2011 20:00, schrieb Joris Huizer:
> Hello Henri Verbeet, and André Hentschel
>
> I wasn't (actively) on the mailing list, that's why I couldn't reply directly
> to your messages.
> I will try and make sure I have better titles for such patches in future!
>
> Regards,
> Joris
>
Great,
Hello Henri Verbeet, and André Hentschel
I wasn't (actively) on the mailing list, that's why I couldn't reply directly
to your messages.
I will try and make sure I have better titles for such patches in future!
Regards,
Joris
Since my Mac is dying I have decided to return to the Windows world.
Please pull any and all patches. I have envoked the right to copyright
and none of my code can or will be used in Wine.
Thank you.
James McKenzie
Hello,
I created patch which implement correct _start section in ELF shared
libraries/binaries which generate winegcc.
Into _start section this patch add calling execve syscall which start
wine with all arguments. So it is not needed to generate shell wrapper
and .exe.so binary.
This replace code
Am 04.02.2011 17:24, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 4 February 2011 17:15, Joris Huizer wrote:
>> Subject: kernel32/tests/thread.c: Don't call in ok()
> Why not?
>
>
Because of the GetLastError() calls.
But on the other hand Joris really should mention that in the subject.
Joris, please have a loo
Am 04.02.2011 17:26, schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:51:46PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Am 04.02.2011 16:31, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
>>> André Hentschel writes:
>>>
+unsigned int wld_modulo( const unsigned int a, const Elf32_Word b )
+{
+#ifdef __ARM_
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:51:46PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 16:31, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> > André Hentschel writes:
> >
> >> +unsigned int wld_modulo( const unsigned int a, const Elf32_Word b )
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__
> >> +unsigned int i;
> >> +if(b
On 4 February 2011 17:15, Joris Huizer wrote:
> Subject: kernel32/tests/thread.c: Don't call in ok()
Why not?
On 4 February 2011 15:30, Charles Davis wrote:
> Probably. Every UNIX I've seen uses CUPS (short for Common UNIX Printing
CUPS is probably pretty common these days, but LPD has been around for
a long time. If it's really CUPS specific it should check for CUPS
though, not OS X. Also note that the c
Am 04.02.2011 16:51, schrieb Nikolay Sivov:
> On 2/4/2011 18:33, André Hentschel wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c |2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c b/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c
>> index 2c811cb..d2a61dd 100644
>> --- a/dll
Am 04.02.2011 16:31, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel writes:
>
>> +unsigned int wld_modulo( const unsigned int a, const Elf32_Word b )
>> +{
>> +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__
>> +unsigned int i;
>> +if(b > a) return a;
>> +for(i = 0; i * b < a + b; i++)
>> +if(i * b > a -
On 2/4/2011 18:33, André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c b/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c
index 2c811cb..d2a61dd 100644
--- a/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c
+++ b/dlls/msvcr90/msvcr90.c
@@ -315,7 +315,
André Hentschel writes:
> +unsigned int wld_modulo( const unsigned int a, const Elf32_Word b )
> +{
> +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__
> +unsigned int i;
> +if(b > a) return a;
> +for(i = 0; i * b < a + b; i++)
> +if(i * b > a - b) return (a - i * b);
> +return 0;
That's very ineffic
On 2/4/11 6:53 AM, Loïc Maury wrote:
> On 03/02/11 12:02, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>> Why it's Mac specific?
> In fact I don't know if I need this, but I am on Mac with CUPS, I don't
> know if it the same
> issue for the other platform ?
Probably. Every UNIX I've seen uses CUPS (short for Common UNIX P
Hello Mr.Sivov and Wine community,
On 03/02/11 12:02, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 2/3/2011 13:51, Loïc Maury wrote:
Hello,
I try to implement my first stub function - *AbortPrinter()*.
But before to make a patch, I need your advice.
For what I understood, AbortPrinter(), remove the document
spool
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> +todo_wine
> +ok(SetForegroundWindow(popup), "SetForegroundWindow() error %d\n",
> GetLastError());
It would be interesting to test what the foreground window is actually
set to.
> +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> +ok(DestroyW
Joris Huizer wrote:
> > - ret = DestroyWindow(parent);
> > - ok( ret, "DestroyWindow() error %d\n",
> > GetLastError());
> > + ok(DestroyWindow(parent), "DestroyWindow()
> > error %d\n", GetLastError());
>
> Please don't merge the call with the ok() statement; the GetLastError() call
>
Hello Dmitry Timoshkov,
I noticed a small issue in your patch:
>
> - ret = DestroyWindow(parent);
> - ok( ret, "DestroyWindow() error %d\n",
> GetLastError());
> + ok(DestroyWindow(parent), "DestroyWindow()
> error %d\n", GetLastError());
Please don't merge the call with the ok() stat
> You can't use exception handlers in tests
I'm not sure why not, but I'll take you word of this.
Without exception handling the test cases for RtlCaptureStackBackTrace would
also always crash on Win 2000/NT so that makes all of the tests useless, I
think.
Well, at least I learned how to (/ n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually I am afraid the patch isn't quite correct. If e.g. ps constant 220 is
dirty, and no others are, then highest_dirty_ps_const is 220, and
pshader_const_dirty[ARB_FFP_CONST_TFACTOR] is 0. After setting the texfactor
you still have to reload c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 03.02.2011 um 23:01 schrieb Adam Martinson:
>
> Oddly enough this gives us an average 1.8% boost in the 3DMark06 batch size
> tests.
Impressive.
One more thing you could investigate(but that doesn't affect this patch): Try
to figure out why th
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 00:42, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 09:32 AM, Austin English wrote:
>>
>> - ret = funcs->pfnObjectTrust(&data);
>> + funcs->pfnObjectTrust(&data);
>> + ok(ret == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, got %08x\n", ret);
>
> This doesn't look corre
On 02/04/2011 09:32 AM, Austin English wrote:
-ret = funcs->pfnObjectTrust(&data);
+funcs->pfnObjectTrust(&data);
+ok(ret == S_FALSE, "Expected S_FALSE, got %08x\n", ret);
This doesn't look correct (you are removing the assignment and then
check it). I know
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 20:16, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hey Austin,
>
> + ok(ret == S_FALSE, "Expected S_OK, got %08x\n", ret);
> Copy/pasto.
Thanks, resent.
--
-Austin
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 20:19, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hey Austin,
>
> ok(ret, "WintrustSetRegPolicyFlags failed: %d\n", GetLastError());
> size = sizeof(flags1);
> r = RegQueryValueExA(key, State, NULL, NULL, (LPBYTE)&flags1, &size);
> - ok(flags1 == flags3, "Got %08x flags instead of %0
39 matches
Mail list logo
