Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8419
Your paranoid android.
On 01/17/2011 03:14 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:33:28 -0700
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>
>> Isn't that exactly why we marked all other scripts like this a "third party
>> unsupported tools"? If you moving the same direction, then winetricks will
>> fall into the same cate
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:09:39 +0300, Devaev Maxim
wrote:
The implementation uses a library icmp.dll. Non-root user in Linux
can not work with icmp, special permission is required capabilities.
I
made it so that in case of error simulates the ping delay.
Why this patch is not accepted in upstr
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
I think you messed up the patch subject ;-).
--
-Austin
> It's not wine's fault, and you're not missing any dependencies; the
>> new version of gcc is probably buggy, and the bug is triggered by
>> something inside wine.
>
>If you've compiled Wine before and are re-using object files from an
>old gcc it's possible that there is a conflict between the ob
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> ...
>> It's not wine's fault, and you're not missing any dependencies; the
>> new version of gcc is probably buggy, and the bug is triggered by
>> something inside wine.
>
> If you've com
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> ...
> It's not wine's fault, and you're not missing any dependencies; the
> new version of gcc is probably buggy, and the bug is triggered by
> something inside wine.
If you've compiled Wine before and are re-using object files from an
old gcc
Susan wrote:
> I have the latest version of Natty Narwhal
> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-1ubuntu6) 4.5.2
>...
>gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
>-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
>-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtype-limits
>-W
On 1/18/11 12:10 PM, Susan Cragin wrote:
> pen.c:31:12: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See for instructions.
Looks like you've hit a compiler bug. Do what the error message says,
and report this to the GCC
Could there be a new dependency that isn't summoned by build-dep?
Or is it me?
I have the latest version of Natty Narwhal
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-1ubuntu6) 4.5.2
gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclarati
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> ...
> I'm not sure what you mean by "hijack the IOleCommandTarget". All we do is
> implementing client's IOleCommandTarget. It's something different from
> document's one.
I understand that, but apparently the native implementation (testing
Hans Leidekker writes:
> ---
> dlls/msi/tests/action.c | 84 +-
> 1 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This breaks subsequent tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M msi.dll -T ../../.. -p msi_test.exe.so
install.c && touch instal
Hi Owen,
On 1/18/11 1:35 AM, Owen Rudge wrote:
This resend removes a superfluous function. Parts 1-3 are unaffected.
---
dlls/shdocvw/dochost.c|1 +
dlls/shdocvw/ie.c |6 +---
dlls/shdocvw/iexplore.c | 12 +++-
dlls/shdocvw/navigate.c | 66
+
On 1/17/11 9:28 PM, Erich Hoover wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Please write a test case for this. MSDN seems wrong in this case. It indicates
in one place that we should use CGID_MSHTML as group GUID, and NULL in the
other. The test should make it clean, which ver
14 matches
Mail list logo
