Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8269
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8267
Your paranoid android.
Detlef Riekenberg writes:
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ static MSVCRT_purecall_handler purecall_handler = NULL;
>
> static const char szMsgBoxTitle[] = "Wine C++ Runtime Library";
>
> +#ifndef _WRITE_ABORT_MSG
> +#define _WRITE_ABORT_MSG 1
> +#define _CALL_REPORTFAULT 2
> +#endif
These should go in
On 1/12/2011 07:56, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Mi, 2011-01-12 at 00:48 +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:46:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Partially implement _set_abort_behavior
Please search the patches queue first.
try 2: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/70231
try 1
Ken,
Thank you! Indeed I never installed libicns on my Mac (why use an
external library on the particular OS that created the need for ICNS
format support?) and even reverted Damjan's patch to still create
.png images like the Linux systems. Then I use sips -i to create
.command files with icons
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8260
Your paranoid android.
2011/1/12
> Hi,
>
> please take a look at test.winehq.org
> http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/amstream:amstream.html
>
> It appears that almost all native machines perform 0 tests on amstream.
> As no skip is flagged, results appear all green.
> The only exception are Wylda's XP machines. They ex
> From: Andrew Nguyen
> On 01/11/2011 05:32 AM, Marvin wrote:
> > === WINEBUILD (build) ===
> > Patch failed to apply
> > Patch failed to apply
>
> Again, the bot seems to screw up patch application for some reason.
> Greg, could you take a look at the situation?
Yeah, sorry about that. It appears
I suggest passing this on to the devs of wineskin, a mac-based wine wrapper.
Perhaps it could be added to a subsection of winetricks, too. It would need
to be thoroughly tested of course...
I am very much a newbie. But, if you have some bug-testing you need a
guinea-pig for, and a well-written
Hi,
please take a look at test.winehq.org
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/amstream:amstream.html
It appears that almost all native machines perform 0 tests on amstream.
As no skip is flagged, results appear all green.
The only exception are Wylda's XP machines. They execute 16 tests
but fail on
I ran the tests with Valgrind for wine 1.3.11 on Debian Squeeze. I
haven't yet updated the suppressions file (I'd appreciate feedback on
what to add :p), so the logs are a bit noisy...
But, if you're curious, see http://austinenglish.com/logs/valgrind/
I haven't yet setup the tests on that machin
On Jan 12, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ken Thomases wrote:
>
>> Also, is it common for Windows icons to contain 64x64 variants? My
>> impression is that it's not, but I have no hard data about that. In that
>> case, it's typically better to sc
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ken Thomases wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> The 256x256 pixel icons are designed to be viewed in that size. They
>> can, and often do, contain a different picture to the smaller icons.
>> When you scale them down to a smaller siz
13 matches
Mail list logo