Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8080
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8077
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8073
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8078
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8079
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8070
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8071
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8075
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8076
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8074
Your paranoid android.
All:
It is interesting that I am getting NEGATIVE values for this. I've ran
this against the testbot and received 195 as the value for the System
font in WindowsXP/WindowsVista/Windows7 but when I run this against Wine
installed on a Mac, I get -240. Is this expected behavior or should I
fi
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Sven Baars wrote:
> But I'm not sure if the ##__LINE__ is really necessary.
Yeah, that was overkill.
> #ifdef __WINESRC__
> #define ONCE(x) WINE_ONCE(x)
> #endif
Good idea.
- Dan
Dan Kegel wrote:
How about this:
#define WINE_ONCE(x) { static int wine_once_var##__LINE__; if
(!wine_once_var##__LINE__++) { x; }}
Example use:
-static int once;
-if (!once++) FIXME_(keyboard)("(%p,%d,0x%08x,%X):
stub\n",hwnd,id,modifiers,vk);
+WINE_ONCE(FIXME_(keyboard)("(%p,%d,0
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8042
Your paranoid android.
How about this:
#define WINE_ONCE(x) { static int wine_once_var##__LINE__; if
(!wine_once_var##__LINE__++) { x; }}
Example use:
-static int once;
-if (!once++) FIXME_(keyboard)("(%p,%d,0x%08x,%X):
stub\n",hwnd,id,modifiers,vk);
+WINE_ONCE(FIXME_(keyboard)("(%p,%d,0x%08x,%X):
stub\n",
On 2 January 2011 17:43, wrote:
> The truth is, that wine outputs the first line ("...wait timed out
> in thread 001c, blocked by 0041...") only once and after that only
> the 2nd line repeats every 60sec ("...wait timed out in thread 0045,
> blocked by 0044..."). Don't know if that's normal in t
Hi Henri,
thank you for analysis, it's first time when i'm trying to help with
this kind of problem...
>
> From that backtrace, it doesn't look like 001c is
> waiting for a critical section at all.
>
The truth is, that wine outputs the first line ("...wait timed out
in thread 001c, blocked by
On 2 January 2011 13:59, wrote:
> err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7de77580
> "x11drv_main.c: X11DRV_CritSection" wait timed out in thread 001c,
> blocked by 0041, retrying (60 sec)
>
...
> Backtracing for thread 001c in process 001b (C:\Program Files\2K
> Games\BioShock\Builds\Rele
On 2 January 2011 10:52, Jeremy Chin wrote:
> Newer video cards have stopped reporting the ARB_VERTEX_BLEND GL capability,
> but ARB_VERTEX_PROGRAM implies the same capability.
>
I don't think so. If this works at all it's probably because you're
passing some previous value of gl_max (like GL_MAX_
> ...get the stacks of all running processes with the command
>
> bt all
>
> With luck, you can then see which two code paths are
> competing for the lock.
Thanks for tip! Are the following traces from problematic threads
useful or will i have to post all the thread traces? (Just repeat:
happens
Hey all,
adding '_ONCE' variants of DPRINTF, FIXME, WARN and ERR is a topic that
came up before on wine devel. The first version of the attached patch
was submitted by Max TenEyck Woodbury, but was deferred until after wine
1.2. I still thought it was a good idea to have the _ONCE variants, so
21 matches
Mail list logo
