On 1/1/11 7:10 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Sometimes it helps to run winedbg from another window
and get the stacks of all running processes with the command
bt all
With luck, you can then see which two code paths are
competing for the lock.
Dan:
I've also been getting random 'locks' and this is o
Sometimes it helps to run winedbg from another window
and get the stacks of all running processes with the command
bt all
With luck, you can then see which two code paths are
competing for the lock.
Happy New Year!
i notice, that since 1.3 i get quite offten locking issue. It looks
like, that last OK version was 1.2-rc7. This problem happens in
Bioshock on load/save, but i noticed that other users have same
problem with games on the same game engine.
Could someone help me, what should i do i
On 1/1/11 4:07 AM, maury loïc wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:22 AM, James McKenzie
mailto:jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
On 12/31/10 1:50 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
On 12/31/10 1:11 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
I should add that this patch seem correct to me. It
On 12/31/10 10:43 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
May all your tests be green, and all your patches pass peer review :-)
And may Quality Assurance Testing pass all of your code the first time
and say "Good Job".
James McKenzie
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8018
Your paranoid android.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 06:14:52PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
>
> set | grep LIBRARY
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/Applications/Wine.app/Contents/Resources/Lib
>
> is what I get on my Mac (LD_LIBRARY_PATH has to be set due to the
> UNIXness of Wine.)
Really a properly linked elf binary shouldn't need LD
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:22 AM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> On 12/31/10 1:50 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
>> On 12/31/10 1:11 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
>>
>>> I should add that this patch seem correct to me. It couldn't hurt to get
>>> Charles Davis's input, of course.
>>>
>> I agree, for now. He should
