Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7602
Your paranoid android.
> From: Paul Vriens
> > I'm making some changes to the TestBot infrastructure. This "The specified
> > guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation" error
> > did occur before, but it seems it's more prevalent after I upgraded the
> > hypervisor to ESX 4.1. This might take a
On 12/14/2010 04:44 PM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
Hi André
there is a noisy problem with the WVISTAADM, which causes much tests to be
shown as "Failed" in the patchtracker.
should we blacklist the Message returned by WVISTAADM or can you fix the
underlying problem?
I'm making some changes to the Te
Hi André
> there is a noisy problem with the WVISTAADM, which causes much tests to be
> shown as "Failed" in the patchtracker.
> should we blacklist the Message returned by WVISTAADM or can you fix the
> underlying problem?
I'm making some changes to the TestBot infrastructure. This "The specifie
This is fixed in svn, try
http://winezeug.googlecode.com/svn-history/r2031/trunk/winetricks
Hi,
When I try to install IE6 using winetricks it pops up installer wizard
and when I press I accept installer tells me following error: "Setup was
unable to download required components". (Internet connection is working
well)
Screenshot of error: http://ubuntuone.com/p/Tbs/
Thanks.
On 12/14/2010 12:31 PM, Marvin wrote:
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
The errors pre-date my patch.
Full results can be found at
http
On 12/14/2010 12:19 PM, Marvin wrote:
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
The errors exist without my patch too.
Full results can be fou
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7589
Your paranoid android.
Hi Greg,
there is a noisy problem with the WVISTAADM, which causes much tests to be
shown as "Failed" in the patchtracker.
should we blacklist the Message returned by WVISTAADM or can you fix the
underlying problem?
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7587
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7584
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7586
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7585
Your paranoid android.
Erich Hoover writes:
> Attached is a patch to take kernel32/ntdll ReadFile and WriteFile
> requests on sockets and pass them to WSARecv and WSASend. This patch
> is part of a series I'm working on for the infamous C&C networking bug
> (Bug #7929). The functionality added by this patch was reques
On 12/14/2010 12:08 PM, Marvin wrote:
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Those tests fail on Win7 without my patch too.
http://test.winehq
Austin English writes:
> See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22034
If the errors are properly handled, there's no reason to have an ERR. If
they aren't, that should be fixed.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Charles Davis writes:
> +#if defined(HAVE_GETATTRLIST) && defined(ATTR_VOL_CAPABILITIES) && \
> +defined(VOL_CAPABILITIES_FORMAT) && defined(VOL_CAP_FMT_CASE_SENSITIVE)
> +char *mntpoint = NULL;
> +struct attrlist attr;
> +struct vol_caps caps;
> +struct get_fsid get_fsid;
> +
18 matches
Mail list logo