Attached is a patch to take kernel32/ntdll ReadFile and WriteFile
requests on sockets and pass them to WSARecv and WSASend. This patch
is part of a series I'm working on for the infamous C&C networking bug
(Bug #7929). The functionality added by this patch was requested by a
previous RFC response
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7579
Your paranoid android.
Andrew Eikum writes:
> Typelib objects on Windows support both the reading and the creation
> interfaces. I find it unlikely that they maintain two different
> structures depending on which interface is being used, as Wine
> currently (sort of) does. I think the question is whether the
> struct
On 12/13/2010 10:03 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Andrew Eikum writes:
An array would work, especially for the static structures that are
used now, but these cleanup patches were made with the goal of merging
the typelib-reading and typelib-creation interfaces in mind.
Specifically, impleme
Andrew Eikum writes:
> An array would work, especially for the static structures that are
> used now, but these cleanup patches were made with the goal of merging
> the typelib-reading and typelib-creation interfaces in mind.
> Specifically, implementing the typelib-creation interfaces using the
On 12/13/2010 05:34 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Andrew Eikum writes:
-/* search element n in list */
-for(i=0; i< index; i++)
+i = 0;
+LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (pTypeInfo,&This->typeinfo_list, ITypeInfoImpl, entry)
+{
+if(i>= index)
+break;
+
Just a reminder: If nobody speaks up wine-1.3.9 will be the last version
to support audioio.
On 12/08/2010 04:11 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
I have just submitted a patch to remove wineaudioio.drv from Wine. It
was used by Solaris but the Solaris versions 9 and 10 that are
"supported" by Wine
On 12 December 2010 23:57, Chris Robinson wrote:
> Though I'll defer judgement to others as to what's better.
>
Avoid macros unless you really need them, IMO.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7572
Your paranoid android.
Andrew Eikum writes:
> -/* search element n in list */
> -for(i=0; i < index; i++)
> +i = 0;
> +LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (pTypeInfo, &This->typeinfo_list, ITypeInfoImpl,
> entry)
> +{
> +if(i >= index)
> +break;
> +++i;
> +}
It looks like an array
Am 13.12.2010 08:42, schrieb Hans Leidekker:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 22:44 +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
>
>> r = MsiOpenProductA(prodcode, &hprod);
>> -ok(r == ERROR_INSTALL_PACKAGE_OPEN_FAILED || r == ERROR_SUCCESS,
>> - "Expected ERROR_INSTALL_PACKAGE_OPEN_FAILED or ERROR_SUCCESS
11 matches
Mail list logo
