On 12/3/10 11:15 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
As the VMs in Testbot are now retired we might want to delete the "old" win9x
testdata from test.winehq.org(we need a name for this, testviewer?) manually?
André:
I almost have to agree with this because we should not expect
improvements for these
* On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, André Hentschel wrote:
> As the VMs in Testbot are now retired we might want to delete the "old"
> win9x testdata from test.winehq.org(we need a name for this,
> testviewer?) manually?
Wait, please. Was there some voting been held to make such sentence
official? I think
As the VMs in Testbot are now retired we might want to delete the "old" win9x
testdata from test.winehq.org(we need a name for this, testviewer?) manually?
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Maarten Lankhorst writes:
> @@ -269,6 +269,9 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
> FilterGraphInner_QueryInterface(IUnknown * iface,
> } else if (IsEqualGUID(&IID_IFilterMapper2, riid)) {
> *ppvObj = This->pFilterMapper2;
> TRACE(" returning IFilterMapper2 interface from aggregated
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7434
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7432
Your paranoid android.
Thomas Mullaly writes:
> @@ -3567,7 +3567,7 @@ static HRESULT set_builder_component(LPWSTR *component,
> DWORD *component_len, LP
> return S_OK;
> }
>
> -#define URI(x) ((IUri*) &(x)->lpIUriVtbl)
> +#define URI(x) ((IUri*) &(x)->IUri_iface.lpVtbl)
> #define URIBUILDER(
<<<
A majority of that effort is rewriting tests to make win9x happy, not
rewriting behavior to fix win9x applications.
>>>
Understood
<<<
Few people (if any) want to intentionally break win9x applications,
but spending a large amount of developer effort to maintain the tests
there isn't really
