Re: msvcrt/tests: _itow_s tests (try 3)

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6779 Your paranoid android.

Re: [2/2] msvcrt/tests: qsort_s implementation and tests (try 3)

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6778 Your paranoid android.

re: First contact

It's probably your game's copy protection. We can't advise you on circumventing it. The question probably belongs on wine-users, not wine-devel...

Re: First contact

Hi everyone, Sorry for flooding, but I'm stuck with my bug, I try several debug output channel (+heap, +snoop etc.) but the log shows nothing. It's like I click on the "start" button and boom! Access_violation exception. And what's weird is that the game is still running. I thought that an access

Re: [PATCH] more stubs for mprapi.dll

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:39 PM, wrote: > [PATCH]  more stubs for mprapi.dll The patch is gibberish. Additionally, please include your full real name when submitting patches to wine. -- -Austin

make crosstest fails for _fseeki64 and _ftelli64

I am working on a test for _fseeki64 and _ftelli64. brutalcompu...@brutalcomputer-laptop:~/wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests$ vim file.c brutalcompu...@brutalcomputer-laptop:~/wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests$ make crosstest i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../inclu

Re: [4/6] msvcr80/tests: install test files (try 2)

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6766 Your paranoid android.

Re: [5/6] msvcr80/tests: qsort_s tests (try 2)

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6767 Your paranoid android.

Re: [6/6] msvcr80/tests: _itow_s tests (try 2)

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6768 Your paranoid android.

Re: [2/6] msvcr80: qsort_s implementation (try 2)

Alexandre Julliard writes: > "Vincas Miliūnas" writes: > >> qsort_s and _itow_s implementation and tests for bug #24925. > > These should go in msvcrt, and the tests in msvcr90. msvcr80 is a simple > forwarding dll. To clarify, the tests should go in msvcr90 if the functions don't exist in nati

Re: [2/6] msvcr80: qsort_s implementation (try 2)

"Vincas Miliūnas" writes: > qsort_s and _itow_s implementation and tests for bug #24925. These should go in msvcrt, and the tests in msvcr90. msvcr80 is a simple forwarding dll. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org

Re: [4/4] msxml3: Fix node_get_text() whitespace handling (resend)

Adam Martinson writes: > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ static const WCHAR szBinHex[] = > {'b','i','n','.','h','e','x',0}; > > static const IID IID_xmlnode = > {0x4f2f4ba2,0xb822,0x11df,{0x8b,0x8a,0x68,0x50,0xdf,0xd7,0x20,0x85}}; > > +BOOL is_preserving_whitespace(xmlNodePtr node); Please put func

Re: include: Add IDirect3DRMWinDevice interface (try 2)

On 2 November 2010 23:28, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > +#include > + > +#include I'd expect once to be enough.

Re: xlive: add initial stub dll (1/3)

Am 03.11.2010 um 06:00 schrieb Scott Ritchie: > From a usability perspective we're not going to be doing much good > unless this happens near-automatically with a typical Wine installation. > That means either including them in Wine directly or including hooks to > download them when needed (this

Re: [PATCH 10/14] [Msvcrt*]: implemented _vc(w)printf

Eric Pouech writes: > +int CDECL _vcprintf(const char* format, __ms_va_list xvalist) > { >char buf[2048], *mem = buf; >int written, resize = sizeof(buf), retval; > - __ms_va_list valist; > + __ms_va_list valist = xvalist; You can't copy a valist. This needs to be integrated properly

Re: [PATCH 01/14] [Msvcrt]: now using macro for parameters validation itoa_s (and updated the tests as well)

Eric Pouech writes: > +/* As of today, native and builtin msvcr80, msvcr90, msvcr100 raise an > exception on CRT > + * parameter checking on "secure" > + * As Wine forwards most of the APIs of those msvcrNN DLLs to msvcrt, > builtin msvcrt does > + * raise an exception on those cases > + * Test

Re: msvcrt: Implement _get_tzname.

Eryk Wieliczko wrote: > -static char tzname_std[64] = ""; > -static char tzname_dst[64] = ""; > +static char tzname_std[64] = "PST"; > +static char tzname_dst[64] = "PDT"; > char *MSVCRT__tzname[2] = { tzname_std, tzname_dst }; ... This is not an implementation, this is a quick and dirty hack.

Re: Voting for bugs (Was: Re: [Bug 20969])

Yaron Shahrabani wrote: > I think that voting for bugs is a great feature, otherwise there would have > been many annoying comments like: it happens to me too and what info you can > get out of it? Adding such a comment is pefectly acceptable. Confirming a bug and voting for it are two differen

Re: [4/6] msvcr80/tests: install test files

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6760 Your paranoid android.

Re: [5/6] msvcr80/tests: qsort_s tests

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6761 Your paranoid android.

Re: [6/6] msvcr80/tests: _itow_s tests

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6762 Your paranoid android.