On 11/01/2010 10:47 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Why do you need this? AFAICS the change to compare_line should be enough.
In wine/programs/cmd/tests there are 2 files :
+ test_builtins.cmd
+ test_builtins.cmd.exp
The first one is a kind of .bat on windows.
The wine cmd read line after line and execu
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6694
Your paranoid android.
Hello,
In waiting for my last patch of test for SetCooperativeLevel being accepted, I
send to the list my attempt to fix this function. With the attached patch,all
the already implemented and all the forecoming tests succeded.
I tried to implement Henri's idea about the logic of this function
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6691
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6690
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6689
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6682
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6679
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6677
Your paranoid android.
It is probably a layered window, in which case the following functions
in user32 are relevant: SetLayeredWindowAttributes,
GetLayeredWindowAttributes, UpdateLayeredWindowIndirect, and
UpdateLayeredWindow
Most of user32 is implemented based on gdi32, wineserver, and
winex11.drv. When you see USER_D
Hi everybody,
I am trying to run a pretty complex dotnet (3.5) app which renders flash
contents via flash in a box http://www.f-in-box.com/
I have to say that congratulations are in order to everybody involved because
the whole thing works remarkably well for such a complex amalgam of
technol
On 11/2/2010 01:45, André Hentschel wrote:
BS_TYPEMASK is already defined some lines above that
---
include/winuser.h |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/winuser.h b/include/winuser.h
index 4114756..e04e8ad 100644
--- a/include/winuser.h
+++ b/
Hi Alexandre,
On 11/1/10 4:23 PM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
+/* Substitute escaped spaces with real ones */
+static char* replace_escaped_spaces(const char *data, DWORD size, DWORD
*new_size)
Why do you need this? AFAICS the change to compare_line should be enough.
Jacek
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6667
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6668
Your paranoid android.
--- On Mon, 1/11/10, James Mckenzie wrote:
> From: James Mckenzie
> Subject: Re: Problems with Test
> To: "Charles Davis"
> Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
> Date: Monday, 1 November, 2010, 14:26
> Charles Davis
> wrote:
> >
> >On 10/31/10 9:23 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> >> All:
> >>
> >> I'm
GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 03:12 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> >> +static const char escaped_space[] = "@space@";
> >> +DWORD len_space = strlen(escaped_space);
> > The better way to calculate size of a static string, which is a
> > compile time calculation. strlen() call is
On 11/01/2010 03:12 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
+static const char escaped_space[] = "@space@";
+DWORD len_space = strlen(escaped_space);
The better way to calculate size of a static string, which is a
compile time calculation. strlen() call is a runtime.
The better way is ... ?
In comp
Charles Davis wrote:
>
>On 10/31/10 9:23 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>> All:
>>
>> I'm trying to convert one integer number using a float number factor.
>> Here is the code:
>>
>> int ry = 125;
>> double ryf;
>>
>> ryf = ry/1440;
>>
>> The result is 0 and should be 0.067 (or even more s
On 11/01/2010 07:37 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to fix the wine cmd behavior but as this 5th try differs greatly
with the previous one, I'd like to have some feedback before submitting it.
If you have any question, just let me know.
Thanks is advance.
+static con
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to fix the wine cmd behavior but as this 5th try differs
greatly with the previous one, I'd like to have some feedback before
submitting it.
If you have any question, just let me know.
Thanks is advance.
diff --git a/programs/cmd/tests/batch.c b/programs/cmd/tests/batc
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6658
Your paranoid android.
Please do not apply this patch. Use [try 2]
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6657
Your paranoid android.
On 1 November 2010 11:41, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> Am 01.11.2010 um 10:41 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>
>> On 31 October 2010 22:53, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>>> + static const struct
>>> + {
>>> + float x, y, z;
>>> + float u, v;
>>> + }
>>> + quad[] =
>>> + {
>>> +
Erich Hoover writes:
> @@ -185,6 +185,25 @@ VOID WINAPI GetAcceptExSockaddrs(PVOID, DWORD, DWORD,
> DWORD, struct WS(sockaddr)
> BOOL WINAPI TransmitFile(SOCKET, HANDLE, DWORD, DWORD, LPOVERLAPPED,
> LPTRANSMIT_FILE_BUFFERS, DWORD);
> INT WINAPI WSARecvEx(SOCKET, char *, INT, INT *);
>
> +
On 31 October 2010 22:53, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +static const struct
> +{
> +float x, y, z;
> +float u, v;
> +}
> +quad[] =
> +{
> +{-1.0, -1.0, 0.1,0.0,0.0},
> +{-1.0,1.0, 0.1,1.0,0.0},
> +{ 1.0, -1.0, 0.
28 matches
Mail list logo