-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010-10-14 01:39, Jeremy White wrote:
> Did we have an 'official' leader for GSOC this past year?
Actually, Maarten was doing all the admin work for Wine this year.
> If not, could I ask someone (*cough* Kai *cough*) to nominate themselves?
I'm
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
>
> Is it acceptable to just add a parameter for WS2_recvfrom() or should
> this function get renamed? This function currently mirrors
> WSARecvFrom exactly.
>
Feel free to change the name if you want, I don't have any problems
with it (althou
On 10/12/2010 10:59 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> My health has not improved at all since my last call for help with the
>> Debian package management. I really need someone to take over from me, or at
>> least some help to de
Did we have an 'official' leader for GSOC this past year?
If not, could I ask someone (*cough* Kai *cough*) to nominate themselves?
We need to coordinate getting some information to the SFC so that
we can collect the mentor stipend from Google.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Wise idea or no?
No. It would delete those bugs from bz, unless you move them all to
some new version (e.g., 'pre-0.9'), but that would cause a ton of spam
for no good reason.
> If not is there at least a way to hide them from the report bu
Wise idea or no?
If not is there at least a way to hide them from the report bug page?
I'm talking about the 2001-era version numbers, before 0.9 even.
-Scott Ritchie
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
wrote:
> ...
> + int newsize = (int)*maxsize;
> +
> + /* Make sure there is at least enough room for this entry */
> + newsize -= sizeof(WSACMSGHDR) + CMSG_ALIGN(len);
> + if (newsize < 0)
> + return 0;
> + *maxsize = (ULONG)n
On 9 October 2010 15:51, Reece Dunn wrote:
> try 1 -- initial series (1-3)
> try 2 -- revised test infrastructure based on Jacek's comments
> try 3 -- fleshed out the tests to complete the test coverage for
> IActiveScriptError
Any reason this has not been committed yet?
Thanks,
- Reece
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6155
Your paranoid android.
"Vincent Povirk" writes:
> This shouldn't introduce a failure if Mono is missing.
I'm afraid it does:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M fusion.dll -T ../../.. -p
fusion_test.exe.so fusion.c && touch fusion.ok
wine: Install the Windows version of Mono to run .NET executables
fusion.c:193: Te
10 matches
Mail list logo
