On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Ricardo Filipe
>>Sent: Sep 22, 2010 1:18 PM
>>To: wine-devel@winehq.org
>>Subject: Re: ws2_32: implement AcceptEx and GetAcceptExSockaddrs (try 3)
>>
>>2010/9/21 Mike Kaplinskiy :
>>> Thanks for the
On 22 September 2010 16:53, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.w
-Original Message-
>From: Ricardo Filipe
>Sent: Sep 22, 2010 1:18 PM
>To: wine-devel@winehq.org
>Subject: Re: ws2_32: implement AcceptEx and GetAcceptExSockaddrs (try 3)
>
>2010/9/21 Mike Kaplinskiy :
>> Thanks for the feedback Alexandre. The complexity of the wine APC &
>> I/O system n
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ricardo Filipe
wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Mike Kaplinskiy :
>> Thanks for the feedback Alexandre. The complexity of the wine APC &
>> I/O system never stops amazing me. Third time's the charm?
>>
>> try 3: correctly use an apc to free internal async structures (which
>> wo
Hello, we're the developers of a large 64-bit Windows application that uses
Wine 1.3.0 64-bit on Linux. When testing began we discovered several crashes
inside our windows code on startup and needed to debug them. But the problem
seems to be getting any kind of stack trace information from the
2010/9/21 Mike Kaplinskiy :
> Thanks for the feedback Alexandre. The complexity of the wine APC &
> I/O system never stops amazing me. Third time's the charm?
>
> try 3: correctly use an apc to free internal async structures (which
> would explain why we have the apc parameter...). Strangely moving
Henri Verbeet wrote:
>
> That basically comes down to testing for "fvf & (D3DFVF_RESERVED0 |
> D3DFVF_RESERVED2)". In fact, that would also explain the results for
> D3DFVF_XYZW, and make the explicit check for that redundant.
>
Thank you so much for your helpful feedback.
So I take it someth
On 09/22/2010 07:53 PM, Peter Oberndorfer wrote:
+if(GetVersion()& 0x8000)
+{
+win_skip("Handles work differently on win9x\n");
+return;
+}
+
+signaled = CreateEventW(NULL, TRUE, TRUE, NULL);
Hi Peter,
You could just as easily check for the last error of Cr
"Vincent Povirk" writes:
> +hfind = FindFirstFileW(wildcard, &find_data);
> +
> +if (hfind == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) return FALSE;
> +
> +do {
> +if (find_data.dwFileAttributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY)
> +{
> +strcpyW(mono_path, folder);
> +st
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5404
Your paranoid android.
> I do have a concern which I addressed in the Wine Users mailing list:
>
> Wine is not only used with Linux, it is also used with other *nix
> implementations, to include the one that use, MacOSX. Will there be a port
> to this platform or some
> sort of 'hook' that will allow the use of your d
> If any one wishes to make any comments I'll include those as well as
> contacting Luca Barbieri (?) or who ever is relevant to this over at
> Gallium3D.
Here I am :)
As you have read, this is an initial (but working and with most of the
code there) implementation of the D3D10/11 APIs.
The plan i
On 22 September 2010 17:29, misha680 wrote:
> Right now I am thinking of a simple mask based approach, e.g., extending:
> d3d9types.h:#define D3DFVF_POSITION_MASK 0x400E
> d3d9types.h:#define D3DFVF_TEXCOUNT_MASK 0x0f00
> as well as other masks, and then doing a simple validation for f
Henri Verbeet wrote:
>
> That's insane. Any FVF validation should be done before starting the
> conversion, not afterwards by calling D3DXFVFFromDeclarator().
>
Thank you Henri for your wonderful feedback.
I was wondering if you had any particular suggestions as to the strategy for
verificati
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Tom Spear wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Tom Spear
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
>
Thank you for your help!
--
Best regards,
Vitaly Perov
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5397
Your paranoid android.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Tom Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tom Spear
On 22 September 2010 01:36, Edward Savage wrote:
> I've finally got time to push out another WWN, already half done, and
> this seems like some thing that definitely needs to be addressed, due
> to Phoronix's claims:
>
> "... it's already working and can be hooked into Wine!"
>
Phoronix is full of
19 matches
Mail list logo
