Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5396
Your paranoid android.
On 22 September 2010 03:26, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> Credit for the idea of comparing the result of D3DXDeclaratorFromFVF
> to D3DXFVFFromDeclarator goes to Tony Wasserka:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git/blob/Merge:/dlls/d3dx9_36/mesh.c
> (see line 405, and his comparison is vice versa - i.e
El 21/09/10 18:36, Edward Savage escribió:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Chris Robinson wrote:
Hm. The author of the commit for some reason believes that this is
possible. Is he simply misguided?
Well, one can pray that eventual
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tom Spear
> wrote:
> >> > Attached is the lsusb -v output, trimmed to only
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Chris Robinson wrote:
>
> Hm. The author of the commit for some reason believes that this is
> possible. Is he simply misguided?
>
> Well, one can pray that eventually nvidia will add gallium 3d support
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Chris Robinson wrote:
>
> IIRC, it's been discussed before, and it simply wouldn't work. D3D has too
> many ties to the Windows API that a non-Windows based implementation wouldn't
> be appropriate for Wine (try getting an HDC from a D3D resource, or passing an
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
>> > Attached is the lsusb -v output, trimmed to only include the pedometer's
>> > info. I have many USB devices, so I didn't wa
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> ---
> dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 141 +-
> 1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M user32.dll -T ../../.. -p
user32_test.exe.so msg.c && touch msg.ok
ms
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
> > Attached is the lsusb -v output, trimmed to only include the pedometer's
> > info. I have many USB devices, so I didn't want to leave you to sort
> through
> > a bunch of useless info
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> ...
> I'll get working on the basics of USB first. If the device doesn't
> work on your tests after that, SSH access might be quicker and easier
> than intercontinental shipping.
That's an interesting plan... If you're interested I might
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
> Attached is the lsusb -v output, trimmed to only include the pedometer's
> info. I have many USB devices, so I didn't want to leave you to sort through
> a bunch of useless info.
>
> I don't have the webcam with me at the moment, but I will see i
On second thought, please don't commit this. It'll be better to design
this around the COM interface in .NET 4, and easier to do that while
the current code is simple.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
Attached is the lsusb -v output, trimmed to only include the pedometer's
info. I have many USB devices, so I didn't want to leave you to sort through
a bunch of useless info.
I don't have the webcam with me at the moment, but I will see if I can find
it when I am at home soon.
Thanks
Tom
On Tu
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> This patch should fix the problem reported in the bug 24435.
I don't think you want to modify the structure passed by the app.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Please send the output of "lsusb -v" first so I can see if it's useful.
Thank you for the offer
Damjan
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Tom Spear wrote:
> Now that I think about it, I have a webcam which the last supported windows
> version was XP. I'm not using it for anything since I have anot
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:06:30 am Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found the following article/commit very interesting this morning.
> Has anybody else been looking at this and put thought into whether it
> will work with Wine?
IIRC, it's been discussed before, and it simply wouldn'
Hello,
I found the following article/commit very interesting this morning.
Has anybody else been looking at this and put thought into whether it
will work with Wine?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=92617aeac109481258f0c3863d09c1b8903d438b
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=ar
On 09/21/2010 03:43 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
No, its just that the structure is embedded in another structure and gcc 4.5
only looks at the size of the inner structure for these variable array, and
so does not see it is large enough allocated.
(It is kinda in a gray area, but I am tending towa
Now that I think about it, I have a webcam which the last supported windows
version was XP. I'm not using it for anything since I have another one which
is supported in 7 and linux, but I don't know if it's picked up in linux
either. I could send it your way too tho.
Thanks
Tom
On Tue, Sep 21,
I have a USB pedometer that uploads the data to the internet. I could get
another one and the driver software for you to play with. You have to be a
registered member for a monthly fee to get one otherwise, but my job
sponsors anyone that wants to get/stay in shape that works for them, so
getting a
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov
wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> Spotted by Guillaume ORTEGA. He reports this fixes
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24101
>>
>> Passes kernel32 tests.
>
> That's not a use after close, client's fd passed in the server call is used
> just
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Spotted by Guillaume ORTEGA. He reports this fixes
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24101
>
> Passes kernel32 tests.
That's not a use after close, client's fd passed in the server call is used
just as an association of the server side.
--
Dmitry.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5372
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5370
Your paranoid android.
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 04:21:28 Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 21 September 2010 08:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > fortify is only adding security/sanity checks to functions. so if you
> > do: char f[1];
> >strcpy(f, "1234");
> > the C library, with help from the compiler, will then perform
For those of you who have developed 64-bit apps with wine, I'd like to ask what
debugging tools and techniques you found most effective in that environment.
Anyone have good luck with the 64-bit winedbg or remote debugging using Visual
Studio?
Thanks,
Ben Parker
ESRI
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 03:34:33 Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 17:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > well, i dont think this issue is limited to shell32. it's just the only
> > one to hit it atm. what about my other patch i posted ?
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>> In the past this has found a dozen or two real issues and lead to some
>>> simplifications. Now the tree is clean in that regard, so we can make
>>> this a default.
>> I still see a ton of warnings here (gcc 4.4.5), mos
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Eric Durbin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>>
>> When last I heard from Alexander Morozov (October 2009), he wasn't
>> working on those patches much, and had no interest in sending them to
>> wine-patches.
>>
>> I did some
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:34:33AM +0100, Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 17:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > well, i dont think this issue is limited to shell32. it's just the only one
> > to hit it atm. what about my other patch i posted ?
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5367
Your paranoid android.
On 09/19/2010 07:30 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 09/19/2010 11:11 AM, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
+#include "ipconfig.h"
+
+LANGUAGE LANG_POLISH, SUBLANG_DEFAULT
+
+STRINGTABLE
Hi Łukasz,
This newly created file is UTF-8 so you should add the needed pragma (or
convert to something else). Compiling
On 21 September 2010 08:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 03:34:33 Reece Dunn wrote:
>> On 20 September 2010 17:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > well, i dont think this issue is limited to shell32. it's just the only
>> > one to hit it atm. what about my other patch i pos
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5366
Your paranoid android.
On 20 September 2010 17:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> well, i dont think this issue is limited to shell32. it's just the only one
> to hit it atm. what about my other patch i posted ?
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-September/093377.html
>
How does fortify work?
See http://bl
35 matches
Mail list logo
