Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The tests look OK. Since a part of the code was taken from
> dlls/d3d9/tests/vertexdeclaration.c(which is OK) you should copy the
> copyright lines along as well.
>
Thanks, how about this guy? I have added the copyright notices.
http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.co
Hi,
The tests look OK. Since a part of the code was taken from
dlls/d3d9/tests/vertexdeclaration.c(which is OK) you should copy the copyright
lines along as well.
Am 10.08.2010 um 23:25 schrieb misha680:
>
> Dear All:
>
> I have become more busy with schoolwork than I had imagined.
>
> Howev
That's for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20335 , right?
Alexandre's reply to that was
"It sounds like it's hashing padding bytes. Probably should be reported to the
X.org folks."
X is old code, and I don't think anyone has cleaned it up for valgrind yet.
That's why I use suppression fil
Dear All:
I have become more busy with schoolwork than I had imagined.
However, I would still like, if possible, to finish work on
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22918
It has been suggested that I send patches to the wine-devel list first for
feedback. This way, I hope to be able to get
You will attached the results of the tests on my real vista box
As the last time, I used the original CD of Police: Greatest hits
David
De : "joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com"
À : wine-devel@winehq.org
Cc : tijn...@gmail.com; jeffzaro...@gmail.com; jeremiela
Am 10.08.2010 um 17:42 schrieb Oldrich Jedlicka:
> Ok, I understand. I'm just sending the whole patchset with changed/unchanged
> patches (the number of patches changed, because some of them had been applied
> and some of them I removed, because they don't implement things properly).
Admittedly
Hi,
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4395
contains a new patch and binary where I eliminated a few commands
that might cause the MCIERR_HARDWARE observed with the second
Seek and first Play, as well as a few more calls to "status c mode" to
verify the current state.
Thank you for testi
Hi Stefan,
> 10.8.2010 15:40:40, Stefan Dösinger :
> Diff -u doesn't find any difference between try 4 and try 5, and probably
> older
> tries. If you're resending them because the older ones weren't applied,
> that's
> futile - Alexandre is on vacation.
>
> Also it is generally a bad idea to
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 10 August 2010 15:27, Groeschel, Volker wrote:
>> I wonder if Wine will profit from the new X Presentation and Synchronization
>> feature NVIDIA is working on:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://people.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/x-presentation-and-synchr
On 10 August 2010 15:27, Groeschel, Volker wrote:
> I wonder if Wine will profit from the new X Presentation and Synchronization
> feature NVIDIA is working on:
>
>
>
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/x-presentation-and-synchronization.pdf
>
I doubt it, unless it will somehow make the dri
Am Montag 09 August 2010, 21:41:18 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> ok(hr==DD_OK || broken(hr != DD_OK && SUCCEEDED(hr)),
> "text...")
I think as long as no native app is found that depends on DD_OK it's ok just
use ok(SUCCEEDED(hr)) for the sake of readability.
Diff -u doesn't find any difference between try 4 and try 5, and probably older
tries. If you're resending them because the older ones weren't applied, that's
futile - Alexandre is on vacation.
Also it is generally a bad idea to keep resending a unchanged patch. If you
think the patch has been
Hi,
I wonder if Wine will profit from the new X Presentation and Synchronization
feature NVIDIA is working on:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/x-presentation-and-synchronization.pdf
According to the Phoronix article the feature is planed for X.Org Server 1.10:
http://www.phoronix.com/
Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
>may be the driver doesn't support TMSF, and from/to fields must be provided in
>MSF
>would you mind trying that ?
Me? The others ;) The 5 machines I've had access to all pass the tests.
I somehow doubt it'll help because Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
>> set c time format tmsf
>> se
Hello Austin,
Austin Lund wrote:
> On 10 August 2010 18:05, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> Hello Austin,
>>
>> Austin Lund wrote:
>>>
>
>> both functions are heavily used and you don't want to waste time
>> HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY ju
On 10 August 2010 18:05, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello Austin,
>
> Austin Lund wrote:
>>
>>
> both functions are heavily used and you don't want to waste time
> HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY just to please valgrind. I even wonder why
Hello Austin,
Austin Lund wrote:
>
>
> From 07bc18edc35c68c8e0da58a70ccd5c8f03584a1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Austin Lund
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:03:14 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] winex11.drv: Fix uninitialised val
17 matches
Mail list logo
