Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4262
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4261
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4260
Your paranoid android.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Austin English wrote:
> --
> -Austin
>
>
>
>
The colons aren't decorative separators, but rather determine which
short arguments expect a parameter as per the requirements of
getopt/getopt_long. With your patch applied:
$ tools/winebuild/winebuild -h
tools/winebui
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4251
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4250
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4248
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4246
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4245
Your paranoid android.
On 8/3/10 4:58 AM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
> How can I compile a single RC file?
After configuring Wine, go to the directory containing the RC file and
type in a Terminal:
make .res
where is the part of the filename before the '.rc' extension.
So if you wanted to compile only He.rc for regedit,
On 08/03/2010 03:09 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 3 August 2010 21:57, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>
>> This bug, for instance, prevents Photoshop from working unless there is
>> an Arial font installed: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9623
>> Wine doesn't seem to respect system-level fontconfig a
How can I compile a single RC file?
Yaron Shahrabani
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Yaron Shahrabani writes:
>
> > Hope everything is cool this time :)
> > +IDD_EXPORT_TEMPLATE DIALOG 50, 50, 278, 54
> > +STYLE DS_3DLOOK | DS_CONTROL | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE |
On 3 August 2010 21:57, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> This bug, for instance, prevents Photoshop from working unless there is
> an Arial font installed: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9623
> Wine doesn't seem to respect system-level fontconfig aliases, so even
> though Liberation Sans is install
I was looking through our fairly large collection of open font bugs and
realized that things might be a lot simpler if we took some opinionated
positions and just declared certain fonts to be dependencies and
expected all packagers to provide them.
This is similar to bundling our own Tahoma, excep
Andrew Eikum writes:
> This is different from the latest PSDK, but Wine's SHILCreateFromPath
> accepts both types, so we shouldn't make compiler warnings about it.
If there are warnings with the Windows headers there should be warnings
with the Wine ones too.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@win
On 08/02/2010 05:49 PM, Jeff Cook wrote:
---
dlls/winealsa.drv/waveinit.c | 6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
-int scan_devices = (fixedpcmdev == -1);
+/* we always want to scan_devices; otherwise, if a default is set and the
+appropriate registry keys are not
[to list as well]
On 3 August 2010 15:07, Dimi Paun wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 14:30 +0200, Alexandru Băluț wrote:
>> How difficult would it be to use ReCaptcha?
>> http://www.google.com/recaptcha
> Hm, don't know. We could hack our version to support recaptcha,
> but I'm not familiar with
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 14:30 +0200, Alexandru Băluț wrote:
> How difficult would it be to use ReCaptcha?
>
> http://www.google.com/recaptcha
Hm, don't know. We could hack our version to support recaptcha,
but I'm not familiar with the code base, and I don't have the
time right now. But I can take
On 08/02/2010 05:48 PM, Jeff Cook wrote:
Moved check to conform with C90.
+if (mastelem) {
+/* Master control */
...
+} else {
Please follow file's format.
Vitaliy
On 08/02/2010 05:50 PM, Jeff Cook wrote:
-
+
You adding trailing spaces here.
+} else {
+default_used = 1;
}
Please follow files' format - curly braces go on separate line. Also you
don't need braces for one line "else".
Vitaliy.
On 08/02/2010 05:49 PM, Jeff Cook wrote:
---
dlls/winealsa.drv/waveinit.c | 9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+sprintf(description, "%s %d:%d", snd_pcm_info_get_name(infop),
snd_pcm_info_get_card(infop),
Please use snprintf to prevent possible buffer overflow.
W dniu 03.08.2010 13:28, Nikolay Sivov pisze:
On 8/3/2010 13:58, Mariusz Pluciński wrote:
---
dlls/gameux/Makefile.in | 1 +
dlls/gameux/factory.c | 5 ++
dlls/gameux/gamestatistics.c | 153
++
dlls/gameux/gameux_private.h | 1 +
dlls/gameux/regsvr.c | 9 +++
5
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 18:01, Dimi Paun wrote:
> Now that this issue is fixed, we can look again at the spam
> problem. It was suggested that we use a 'TextChas' for non
> logged in users:
> http://moinmo.in/HelpOnSpam
>
> But it seems it's not too easy to come up with decent questions.
> Shou
On 8/3/2010 13:58, Mariusz Pluciński wrote:
---
dlls/gameux/Makefile.in |1 +
dlls/gameux/factory.c|5 ++
dlls/gameux/gamestatistics.c | 153
++
dlls/gameux/gameux_private.h |1 +
dlls/gameux/regsvr.c |9 +++
5 file
Am 03.08.2010 um 02:47 schrieb Vitaly Budovski:
> The INFINITY macro is part of C99, but for NaN, why not use something
> like sqrt(-1) ?
We don't use C99 features in Wine, some compilers don't support them.
sqrt(-1) may or may not work, but it will be essentially the same as 0.0 / 0.0.
Compiler
Jeff Cook writes:
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int ALSA_ScanDevices(int directhw,
> char *pcmname = NULL;
> snd_pcm_t *pcm;
>
> -sprintf(defaultpcmname, "default");
> +sprintf(defaultpcmname, "default:%d", card);
We used to do that, but it was
Yaron Shahrabani writes:
> Hope everything is cool this time :)
> +IDD_EXPORT_TEMPLATE DIALOG 50, 50, 278, 54
> +STYLE DS_3DLOOK | DS_CONTROL | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CLIPSIBLINGS |
> +WS_BORDER
> +WS_EX_LAYOUTRTL
> +FONT 8, "MS Shell Dlg"
That's not valid syntax. Please try to compile
David Hedberg writes:
> +static LRESULT resize_namespacetree(NSTC2Impl *This)
> +{
> +RECT rc;
> +TRACE("%p\n", This);
> +
> +GetClientRect(This->hwnd_main, &rc);
> +SetWindowPos(This->hwnd_tv, HWND_TOP, rc.left, rc.top,
> + rc.right, rc.bottom, SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
A
Jeff Cook wrote:
> What compiler are you running? It works fine for me and I don't see
> any errors or warnings.
You are passing the compiler the wrong flags:
-Wdeclaration-after-statement is set by default in Wine.
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
>> Jeff Cook writ
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:43 PM, wrote:
> Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
>
>>Would you mind supplying a new binary?
> Testbot did it for us: job #4154
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4154
>
> Regards,
> Jörg Höhle
This new #4154 binary doesn't have any failures when run from the MinGW shell:
30 matches
Mail list logo
