James Mckenzie wrote:
Octavian Voicu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
wrote:
Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
What about debi
Dan McDonald wrote:
On 07/21/2010 11:10 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 21.07.2010 19:01, schrieb Mariusz Pluciński:
W dniu 19.07.2010 15:02, Henri Verbeet pisze:
2010/7/18 Mariusz Pluciński:
+static HINSTANCE hInstance;
This is unused.
You're mixing tabs an
2010/7/21 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes :
> This series adds a menu bar and Open URL dialog box to Wine's IE.
>
> try2:
> - Fix errors pointed out by Jacek
> - Don't use ExecWB() until we can be sure it uses CGID_MSHTML
> Alexander N. Sørnes
You should merge the "New" and "Window" in a single menu
On 07/21/2010 11:10 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 21.07.2010 19:01, schrieb Mariusz Pluciński:
>> W dniu 19.07.2010 15:02, Henri Verbeet pisze:
>>> 2010/7/18 Mariusz Pluciński:
+static HINSTANCE hInstance;
>>> This is unused.
>>>
>>> You're mixing tabs and spaces, and have a couple of traili
Henri wrote:
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/HLSLTestSuite
> That page is pretty awful.
Yep, it was written very quickly by somebody who doesn't know d3d at all.
Now that somebody's working on an HLSL test suite, it can fade away,
or maybe be replaced with a description of the final test suite, if
that
Am 23.07.2010 18:26, schrieb Octavian Voicu:
> Seems that f1ea06375d76c9f8e181e3ee4874ddef661e80c2 introduces a build
> error on Ubuntu with gcc 4.4.3.
>
> [...]
> ccache gcc -m32 -c -I../../../wine-git/dlls/user32 -I.
> -I../../../wine-git/include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_USER32_
> -D_WI
Seems that f1ea06375d76c9f8e181e3ee4874ddef661e80c2 introduces a build
error on Ubuntu with gcc 4.4.3.
[...]
ccache gcc -m32 -c -I../../../wine-git/dlls/user32 -I.
-I../../../wine-git/include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_USER32_
-D_WINABLE_ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:50 AM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Octavian Voicu wrote:
>>On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
>> wrote:
>>> Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
>>> Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
>>>
>>> Ah, Readha
On 07/23/2010 04:19 PM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
+memset(out, 0, sizeof(out));
It's usually better to fill it with something other than '0'. Checking
later for '0' could mean that either the rest of the buffer is indeed
untouched or is cleared/zeroed.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On 07/23/2010 08:57 AM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 07/21/2010 10:23 AM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
Please more-less follow the format of the file and don't add yet one more.
+if(outLen == 0)
+return 0;
Need space between "if" and "(".
+if(!buf){
Curly bracket goes on to separate
On 07/21/2010 10:23 AM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
Please more-less follow the format of the file and don't add yet one more.
+if(outLen == 0)
+return 0;
Need space between "if" and "(".
+if(!buf){
Curly bracket goes on to separate line.
+buf = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, o
Octavian Voicu wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
> wrote:
>> Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
>> Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
>>
>> Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
>> What about debian?
>>
>> Isn't th
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
wrote:
> Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
> Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
>
> Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
> What about debian?
>
> Isn't the OpenSSL documentation way th
2010/7/23 Misha Koshelev :
> Please find attached the relevant data.
>
> I do not see a way from this data to generate the faces a vertex is part of
> that would be simpler
> than what I am doing for indices.
>
Well, if you look at e.g. the data for slices 6, stacks 7, there
indices are certainly
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3778
Your paranoid android.
> "Paul" == Paul Vriens writes:
>>
Paul> And this is what my include file shows:
Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
What about debian?
Isn'
On 07/23/2010 11:18 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 07/23/2010 10:53 AM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Hello,
on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines
const SSL_METHOD *method;
as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html
and so in
../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c
static SSL_
On 07/23/2010 10:53 AM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Hello,
on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines
const SSL_METHOD *method;
as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html
and so in
../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c
static SSL_METHOD *method;
is flagges as an warning.
M
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3772
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3771
Your paranoid android.
Hello,
on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines
const SSL_METHOD *method;
as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html
and so in
../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c
static SSL_METHOD *method;
is flagges as an warning.
My patch exchanged
-static SSL_METHOD *metho
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3770
Your paranoid android.
Am 22.07.2010 um 22:15 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> > This is redundant, lpDD is already an IDirectDraw interface.
> You are right, I thought it is some default (=latest, V7) interface. I will
> change it.
Fyi:
static LPDIRECTDRAW lpDD = NULL;
LPDIRECTDRAW is just a typedef for IDirectDraw * . I
23 matches
Mail list logo
