On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:08:30 +0200
>> Gert van den Berg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23, James Mckenzie
>>> wrote:
>>>
Rosanne and you have a good point, but I would restrict it the
All:
I've been making statements on the mailing list about some of the less
documented features of Wine coding.
I've also stated that asking questions is much better than asking
permission(in a very round about way.)
So here goes:
I am building a test for the EM_FINDWORDBREAK function
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:08:30 +0200
Gert van den Berg wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23, James Mckenzie
wrote:
Rosanne and you have a good point, but I would restrict it the limit to four
lines. You should be able to describe a valid bug in that space. Any
James Mckenzie wrote:
> On that vein of thought, why don't we have a code standard page? I've been
> asking this question and maybe this should be my next area of concern after
> the release of Wine 1.2 and the reinput of my patches. This way, I can use
> my 'years of expertise' and what I've l
Hi
I just tried to configure an windows application which requires a connection
from a remote mssql server.
But I not succeded in it.
I am getting
Connection failed :
SQLState : '01000'
SQL Server Error : 10061
.
Connection failed :
SQLState : '08001'
SQL Server Error : 17
..
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> - the FIXME_ONCE guy; I think you and I are giving him the same advice;
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-July/085069.html
> so that seems fine.
Aha. This is the thread that probably bothered you:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail
Am 15.07.2010 18:29, schrieb James Mckenzie:
> On that vein of thought, why don't we have a code standard page? I've been
> asking this question and maybe this should be my next area of concern after
> the release of Wine 1.2 and the reinput of my patches. This way, I can use
> my 'years of ex
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:08:30 +0200
Gert van den Berg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23, James Mckenzie
> wrote:
> > Rosanne and you have a good point, but I would restrict it the limit to
> > four lines. You should be able to describe a valid bug in that space.
> > Anything more, and it
Henri Verbeet wrote:
>
>On 14 July 2010 16:26, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> If you ask me,
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6971#c371
>> is more objectionable, because it shows the Wine
>> community to be ill-mannered and hostile to newbies.
>Sure, it could have been worded more carefully, but I
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:09:22 -0700
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> As you point out, people don't read... it might be more useful to
> put a length limit check so that posting a long comment requires
> privileges. Maybe that could be done as simply as "if this is user's
> first bug, don't let him post mor
Misha wrote:
> 2) Finally, as you have noticed, per Dan's advice, I have implemented
> this function:
> ...
> These seem, if anything, much simpler, and, I have noticed in the case
> of very complicated test data, more accurate.
>
> I am going to change my code to use these latter functions, even t
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> However, if we're talking about being harmful to the project, I think
> it's far more insidious and actively harmful to pretend being an
> active / respected Wine developer and giving potential new developers
> bad advice from that position.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Rosanne and you have a good point, but I would restrict it the limit to four
> lines. You should be able to describe a valid bug in that space. Anything
> more, and it becomes an attachement.
4 lines is horribly short... Especially for po
> Paris is a big city, where is the venue?
We're still negotiating. It looks like it will be the
Ibis Paris Bastille Opéra, but but don't consider that
certain.
(And, sadly, I'm developing a bias against Parisian
hospitality workers :-( ).
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 14 July 2010 16:26, Dan Kegel wrote:
> If you ask me,
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6971#c371
> is more objectionable, because it shows the Wine
> community to be ill-mannered and hostile to newbies.
Sure, it could have been worded more carefully, but I don't buy the
"taints us all"
Francois Gouget wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>
>WineConf 2010 is taking shape: the date has been set and we are now in
>the final stages of picking the venue.
>
>The host city: Paris
>
Paris is a big city, where is the venue?
James McKenzie
>> Would it be possible to add a line to the text above the comment entry box
>> (by the "do not paste logs" warning) telling people more explicitly what
>> sorts
>> of comments are appropriate, and directing them to the forum for user
>> support?
>> Yes, I know some people will ignore it anyway,
Dear All:
Thank you again for all your help.
To remind you, I am working on fixing:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22918
And, as we are currently in code freeze, I have a GitHub repo here in
which I am making relevant changes:
http://github.com/misha680/wine/commits/master
I am going ov
Rosanne wrote:
> A lot of new users mistake bugzilla for a support forum, and bug reports are
> littered with comments that don't belong there.
Yes, that's a problem.
> Would it be possible to add a line to the text above the comment entry box
> (by the "do not paste logs" warning) telling people
Hi,
WineConf 2010 is taking shape: the date has been set and we are now in
the final stages of picking the venue.
The host city: Paris
The date: Saturday 20th and Sunday 21st of November
So mark the date in your calendar and start booking your plane tickets;
this will be the place t
Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Chris Robinson wrote:
>> * On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:02:59 pm Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>>> 'FIXME's that contain no variable information are completely redundant
>>> after their first report. After the first reminder, the additional
>>> rep
* On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Chris Robinson wrote:
> * On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:02:59 pm Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> >
> > 'FIXME's that contain no variable information are completely redundant
> > after their first report. After the first reminder, the additional
> > reports are just noise. Th
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> If I am not mistaken, Alexandre is the one who decides what gets fixed.
> I observe that some movement has already taken place with respect to
> bug 15345. In reviewing the various files, some patching has already
> been done, so 'WONTFIX' is not really an option. H
On 07/15/2010 01:13 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
I may be new to Wine, but I have a substantial amount of experience
designing, writing and fixing code. I learned programming by fixing my
fathers code. I more than understand and accept your desire to decide
that '_ON
24 matches
Mail list logo
