Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2695
Your paranoid android.
On 06/15/2010 05:36 AM, Paul Chitescu wrote:
> Changelog:
> winex11.drv: Post a WM_SYSCOMMAND SC_CLOSE when the Window Manager asks
> to
> close a window
> +GetCursorPos( &pt );
> +PostMessageW( hwnd, WM_SYSCOMMAND, SC_CLOSE, MAKELPARAM( pt.x,
> pt.y ) );
You can't
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2686
Your paranoid android.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, James Mckenzie wrote:
[...]
> >I'd say we need turn those into traces and add fixmes for the
> >unimplemented parts, if needed.
> >
> This actually might be better, but don't TRACES only appear if you are
> running in debug mode? We do want to inform our user base that a
> f
> So whoever accepts or rejects the patches
Alexandre Julliard is the commit imperator
>, you may as well reject all of
> mine (if you haven't already). I'll send them again once I'm on the right
> track.
>
> Thanks all.
On 15/06/10 20:26, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
On 06/15/2010 08:53 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
On 15/06/10 10:28, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
That's just an artifact of how the translation statistics tool works.
But Wine will use LANG_ENGLISH SUBLANG_DEFAULT if there is no
SUBLANG_NEUTRAL translation.
Am 15.06.2010 21:47, schrieb Ken Sharp:
>
>
> On 15/06/10 20:34, André Hentschel wrote:
>
>> BTW: Placing your Copyrights in the translation files for some text
>> copying is somehow naughty...
>>
>
> I asked about that in #winehackers and I was told I should add my own
> copyright. Personally
On 15/06/10 20:34, André Hentschel wrote:
BTW: Placing your Copyrights in the translation files for some text copying is
somehow naughty...
I asked about that in #winehackers and I was told I should add my own
copyright. Personally, I couldn't care less.
Am 15.06.2010 20:53, schrieb Ken Sharp:
>
>
> On 15/06/10 10:28, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>
>> That's just an artifact of how the translation statistics tool works.
>> But Wine will use LANG_ENGLISH SUBLANG_DEFAULT if there is no
>> SUBLANG_NEUTRAL translation. Duplicating unneeded resources mak
On 06/15/2010 08:53 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
On 15/06/10 10:28, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
That's just an artifact of how the translation statistics tool works.
But Wine will use LANG_ENGLISH SUBLANG_DEFAULT if there is no
SUBLANG_NEUTRAL translation. Duplicating unneeded resources makes them
prone
Hans Leidekker wrote:
>
>On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:25 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
>> Just to confirm what André said, if the FIXME does not contain the word
>> 'stub', then apistats has no way to know it's a (pseudo-)stub.
>
>Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
On 15/06/10 10:28, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
That's just an artifact of how the translation statistics tool works.
But Wine will use LANG_ENGLISH SUBLANG_DEFAULT if there is no
SUBLANG_NEUTRAL translation. Duplicating unneeded resources makes them
prone for bitrotting.
bye
michael
I
After applying my "[RESEND 2] Changes to enable the use of gcov and PGO" patch
To use gcov:
Run "make EXTRACFLAGS=--coverage LDFLAGS=--coverage"
Run program (presumably test suite)
Run "gcov file.c" (multiple files like "gcov *.c" doesn't work for
some reason)
To use PGO
Run "make EXTRA
> Can you show me at least 3 stub functions with a fixme and without the stub
> keyword
grep can do that for you. One file alone will do this:
dlls/itss/protocol.c. There are many more.
--Juan
Am 15.06.2010 11:25, schrieb Hans Leidekker:
> Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
Can you show me at least 3 stub functions with a fi
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2673
Your paranoid android.
Max wrote:
> A little reassurance that I am not crazy and
> have the social skills needed to contribute to the community
> are what I need at the moment.
OK. I'd suggest starting by looking at
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15435
"Wine logs too verbose, quieter fixme's needed"
and sending
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Hans Leidekker wrote:
[...]
> Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
>
> > I would further argue that even a human r
Andrew Nguyen writes:
> @@ -1458,24 +1458,25 @@ static DWORD decompress_file_lz( LPCWSTR source,
> LPCWSTR target )
>
> static UINT CALLBACK decompress_or_copy_callback( PVOID context, UINT
> notification, UINT_PTR param1, UINT_PTR param2 )
> {
> +static int has_extracted;
> +
This is
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:41 +0100, Peter Davies wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> > fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> > percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
>
> A FIXME doesn't neccesarily in
> Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
A FIXME doesn't neccesarily indicate a stub. It sometimes is like
"Flag FOO unsupported", which
> Somehow this patch got munged in transit and will not apply to current git.
> Can you update it and send it again?
I think my mail client (gmail) line wraps. I discovered when trying to
apply it myself.
> As an aside, if gcov compilation finally starts working that means we
> can build Wine u
Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> On 15/06/10 09:00, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Ken Sharp writes:
>>
>>> @@ -50,3 +51,43 @@ STRINGTABLE DISCARDABLE
>>> IDS_AVIFILETYPE"Wine AVI-default-filehandler"
>>> IDS_UNCOMPRESSED "uncompressed"
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +LANGUAGE LANG_ENGLISH, SUBLANG_NEUT
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:25 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Just to confirm what André said, if the FIXME does not contain the word
> 'stub', then apistats has no way to know it's a (pseudo-)stub.
Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
fixme in a WINAPI function as
On 15/06/10 09:00, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ken Sharp writes:
@@ -50,3 +51,43 @@ STRINGTABLE DISCARDABLE
IDS_AVIFILETYPE "Wine AVI-default-filehandler"
IDS_UNCOMPRESSED "uncompressed"
}
+
+LANGUAGE LANG_ENGLISH, SUBLANG_NEUTRAL
+/* Same as SUBLANG_DEFAULT */
If they are
Hi again,
As the design seems to be liked, we just made the garments available for sale.
As always, you can find them at http://www.freewear.org/?org=Wine
Cheers!
Ismael
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 14.06.2010 22:01, schrieb Hans Leidekker:
> > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 21:26 +0200, André Hentschel wrote:
> >
> >> Hans might have missed that
> >
> > No, to me a fixme that prints a parameter list without further
> > explanation implies that the fu
Marcus Meissner writes:
> Testruns show that on 32bit we have 100 and 132 as struct size,
> while on 64bit we have 176, 240, and also 248.
>
> See this page for a loop from 1..300:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2643
So why aren't you doing that loop in the final test? As it is,
Ken Sharp writes:
> @@ -50,3 +51,43 @@ STRINGTABLE DISCARDABLE
>IDS_AVIFILETYPE"Wine AVI-default-filehandler"
>IDS_UNCOMPRESSED "uncompressed"
> }
> +
> +LANGUAGE LANG_ENGLISH, SUBLANG_NEUTRAL
> +/* Same as SUBLANG_DEFAULT */
If they are the same there's no reason to duplicate
Thank you Dan.
> What problem are you trying to solve?
Curing my ignorance and rebuild my self-confidence. :)
> I gather you're just plowing through the output of 'make test',
> looking at each bit of noise, and trying to figure out a way
> to improve the tests?
Sort of. I needed a place to st
30 matches
Mail list logo
