On 14/06/10 18:12, Edward Savage wrote:
I'm looking to try and fill out a WWN for this friday
I really think it would be very beneficial to go into some detail on the
64-bit support. In particular, it would be a good idea to outline the
expected user experience when running a 64-bit app.
On 06/14/2010 08:04 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> Peter Davies wrote:
>> To use gcov you must pass --coverage at both compile and link time.
>> This patch means that "make CFLAGS=--coverage LDFLAGS=--coverage",
>> "make test",
>> "gcov file.c" is sufficient generate .gcov files.
>>
>>
> Peter:
>
On 06/14/2010 11:02 AM, Ing. Simone. Giustetti wrote:
> How about 64 bit packages with Wow64 ? This feature is described as a major
> one
> for Wine release 1.2, but as far as I know no x86_64 package was released yet.
> I've been using it since release 1.1.44 for testing purposes and it seems
>
Jan Hoogenraad wrote:
James Mckenzie wrote:
Jan Hoogenraad Jun 14, 2010 8:05 AM wrote:
OK. New version of the script: it also finds uppercase filename
matches.
It also removed:
131072 1999-01-15 04:37 system32/MAPISTUB.DLL
70656 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/MSVCIRT.DLL
326656 2008-10-06
Peter Davies wrote:
To use gcov you must pass --coverage at both compile and link time.
This patch means that "make CFLAGS=--coverage LDFLAGS=--coverage", "make test",
"gcov file.c" is sufficient generate .gcov files.
Peter:
Somehow this patch got munged in transit and will not apply to cur
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2647
Your paranoid android.
Mind the timestamps & sizes. In this case, these files were installed
with the installation of an application or winetricks.
I am now trying to get rid of as much of this old stuff, in order to be
as much wine as possible.
James Mckenzie wrote:
Jan Hoogenraad Jun 14, 2010 8:05 AM wrote:
OK.
OK. New version of the script: it also finds uppercase filename matches.
It also removed:
131072 1999-01-15 04:37 system32/MAPISTUB.DLL
70656 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/MSVCIRT.DLL
326656 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/MSVCRT40.DLL
492304 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/OLEAUT32.DLL
Now, is seems t
Hey folks,
I have a fix here for bug 18606. I think it's decent, but I could use
another few sets of eyes to make sure I didn't miss anything, or even
that I'm not way on the wrong track.
The problem and solution are described in patch 3. In brief,
SHChangeNotify notifies windows when a ch
Am 14.06.2010 22:01, schrieb Hans Leidekker:
> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 21:26 +0200, André Hentschel wrote:
>
>> Hans might have missed that
>
> No, to me a fixme that prints a parameter list without further
> explanation implies that the function is a stub.
>
>
That's somehow true, but for easier
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 21:26 +0200, André Hentschel wrote:
> Hans might have missed that
No, to me a fixme that prints a parameter list without further
explanation implies that the function is a stub.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Ing. Simone. Giustetti wrote:
> How about 64 bit packages with Wow64 ? This feature is described as a major
> one
> for Wine release 1.2, but as far as I know no x86_64 package was released yet.
> I've been using it since release 1.1.44 for testing purpose
Hi,
Łukasz did it, Polish translations of Wine reached the 100% mark !!!
Great job done.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi,
Just a note to thank Ricardo for getting the Portuguese translations
back to 100%.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On 14 June 2010 18:54, Peter Davies wrote:
> On 14 June 2010 18:40, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>
>> Since around 2-3 months ago, you don't need to run "make depend" at all :-).
>>
>> Damjan
>>
>
> Then why is it still there?
When you run `make`, `make depend` is called automatically so you
don't n
How about 64 bit packages with Wow64 ? This feature is described as a major one
for Wine release 1.2, but as far as I know no x86_64 package was released yet.
I've been using it since release 1.1.44 for testing purposes and it seems pretty
stable.
If there are no objections, I'll upload i486 and x8
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
> Then why is it still there?
I think it's still used internally. If you run `make depend' then
'make' you'll see it will go a bit faster because the dependencies are
already precomputed.
Octavian
On 14 June 2010 18:40, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> Since around 2-3 months ago, you don't need to run "make depend" at all :-).
>
> Damjan
>
Then why is it still there?
Peter
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
> How often do I need to run "make depend"?
>
> Peter
>
>
>
Since around 2-3 months ago, you don't need to run "make depend" at all :-).
Damjan
How often do I need to run "make depend"?
Peter
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2632
Your paranoid android.
Jan Hoogenraad Jun 14, 2010 8:05 AM wrote:
>OK. New version of the script: it also finds uppercase filename matches.
>It also removed:
>
> 131072 1999-01-15 04:37 system32/MAPISTUB.DLL
>70656 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/MSVCIRT.DLL
> 326656 2008-10-06 23:30 system32/MSVCRT40.DLL
> 492304 2
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2626
Your paranoid android.
Marcus Meissner writes:
> It seems to input 248 in my case. Probably it will not get 240,
> but _ATL_MODULEW (or better, the ATL_MODULE C++ class) has some other
> difference.
>
> Question is really how to find out more, as atl.dll is written in C++
> and documentation scarce.
>
> -> so for start
Nikolay Sivov writes:
> On 6/13/2010 18:53, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> How close are we to release?
> Not closely related to a beta testing, but for quality it is - it
> would be nice to have valgrind tests logs as you did some months ago.
> I think it's possible to catch something new that is easy to f
> From: Reece Dunn
>
> msxml3 is not present on NT4, so CLSID_XMLHTTPRequest is not
> registered. This does not fail on the test page, as the msxml3 tests
> are skipped when msxml3.dll is not present.
>
> It would probably be better to issue a win_skip in this instance, but
> it is not relevant to
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Jan Hoogenraad wrote:
[...]
> Can wine handle multiple instances of the server for the different
> directories, when applications from different start directories are running in
> parallel ?
Yes.
--
Francois Gouget http://fgouget.free.fr/
You can have my
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 14 June 2010 08:49, Edward Savage wrote:
>> I've emailed a couple of people today to get an idea of what has
>> changed between 1.0 and 1.2 so we can start to compile the important
>> improvements. Hopefully this can be expanded upon pretty
On 14 June 2010 08:49, Edward Savage wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine1.2Announcement could use some work
>> if anyone has time...
>
> I've emailed a couple of people today to get an idea of what has
> changed between 1.0 and 1.2 so we can s
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine1.2Announcement could use some work
> if anyone has time...
>
I've emailed a couple of people today to get an idea of what has
changed between 1.0 and 1.2 so we can start to compile the important
improvements. Hopeful
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:07:39AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> 2010/6/13 Marcus Meissner :
> > Hi,
> >
> > The size is 248 on Wine64 ... (expected 240), so we miss
> > perhaps a pointer or some alignment.
> >
> > Its not fully clear what.
> >
> > It at least does not crash whe
31 matches
Mail list logo
