On 06/09/2010 04:54 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> While Reading the developer's guide, I noticed that it said that
> translating windows' handles was always done by the server. I may have
> misunderstood this. Since interaction between the client and server
> requires at least two context switc
While Reading the developer's guide, I noticed that it said that
translating windows' handles was always done by the server. I may have
misunderstood this. Since interaction between the client and server
requires at least two context switches and context switches are fairly
heavy duty operation
Am 08.06.2010 12:56, schrieb Mariusz Pluciński:
Hello
As you maybe know, I'm working on implementation of Game Explorer in
the Google Summer of Code. Main part of my work is now implementing
gaming APIs stored in gameux.dll library. I already sent patches
with headers, and I'm currently in the st
hey paul,
i believe i can get to them this weekend as i said.
2010/6/9 Paul Vriens :
> On 05/27/2010 07:37 PM, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
>>
>> i'm adding myself to the list atm. i'll finish the portuguese portugal
>> translations next week.
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Will you be able to do the translations
On 05/27/2010 07:37 PM, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
i'm adding myself to the list atm. i'll finish the portuguese portugal
translations next week.
Hi Ricardo,
Will you be able to do the translations or should we let Miguel have a go?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
>> The patch is also wrong.
> Why? What difference does malloc() over HeapAlloc() make? (this is arguably a
> case for not sending the patch in the first place)
This is because wpp_lookup_mem is only referenced in the wpp_callbacks
structure, wh
On 9 June 2010 19:08, Peter Davies wrote:
>> We use real names here. This patch probably will not be committed until it
>> is resubmitted.
> Ops! I've mis-configured my mail client
>
>> The patch is also wrong.
> Why? What difference does malloc() over HeapAlloc() make? (this is arguably a
> case
Eric Pouech writes:
> +static void CALLBACK MACRO_ExecFile(LPCSTR pgm, LPCSTR args, LONG cmd_show,
> LPCSTR topic)
> {
> -WINE_FIXME("(\"%s\", \"%s\", %u, \"%s\")\n", str1, str2, u, str3);
> +static HINSTANCE (WINAPI *shell_exec)(HWND, LPCSTR, LPCSTR, LPCSTR,
> LPCSTR, INT);
> +HIN
> We use real names here. This patch probably will not be committed until it
> is resubmitted.
Ops! I've mis-configured my mail client
> The patch is also wrong.
Why? What difference does malloc() over HeapAlloc() make? (this is arguably a
case for not sending the patch in the first place)
There
velociraptor Genjix wrote at Jun 9, 2010 8:52 AM
>
>Hey,
>Please look into this issue,
>http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15118
>It seems like a fairly trivial fix which renders this application useless. A
>detailed
>description of the implementation needed is provided in that ticket.
If it
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I suppose winetricks could create uninstaller entries for even
> the little verbs... that would be the windows way of doing things.
+1 for this idea.
--
Steven Edwards
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is
Hello Fakename,
2010/6/9 velociraptor Genjix :
> Hey,
> Please look into this issue,
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15118
> It seems like a fairly trivial fix which renders this application useless. A
> detailed description of the implementation needed is provided in that
> ticket.
> Tha
Hey,
Please look into this issue,
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15118
It seems like a fairly trivial fix which renders this application useless. A
detailed description of the implementation needed is provided in that ticket.
Thank you
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:28, Marco Meijer wrote:
> Hi WineDevs,
>
> I made the patch to change the text on winehq and sent it to wine-patches
> but still no change.
> Do I have to do something else ?
>
> link to patch:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-May/088377.html
>
> kind r
Hi WineDevs,
I made the patch to change the text on winehq and sent it to wine-patches but
still no change.
Do I have to do something else ?
link to patch:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-May/088377.html
kind regards,
Marco Meijer
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patch
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> If you implement a status feature for every trick, you can change the
> main UI into a list of checkboxes, with the installed tricks already
> ticked.
Right, of course. I had even realized that before. I guess I was
just in 'no' mode...
-
Thanks a lot.
Regarding your comment on id=127 "want uninstall":
Could this useage (use winetricks ONLY on a relatively empty .wine
directory to troubleshoot) be documented on every place in the
winetricks documentation directories ?
This is not the way the documentation feels at:
http://wik
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2538
Your paranoid android.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder what "Presto" is,
Autotranslated from www.presto.es:
"Presto is the program [for] budgets, measurements, times, health and
safety, quality and cost control for building and civil works more
prevalent in Hispanic countries."
> and
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> If you or anyone else wants to submit patches to implement a way to
> uninstall things, please go ahead. The user interface would be a challenge,
> though. I'd rather not have an uninstall verb for each regular verb.
If you implement a status
On 9 June 2010 05:42, James McKenzie wrote:
> We use real names here. This patch probably will not be committed until it
> is resubmitted.
>
The patch is also wrong.
Saw this just now:
http://www.osor.eu/news/es-zaragozas-move-to-complete-open-source-desktop-going-to-plan
"Zaragoza's move to complete open source desktop going to plan
by Gijs Hillenius — published on Jun 08, 2010
The move by the city of Zaragoza to an open source desktop is making
good progress.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Tom Wickline wrote:
> $ wine uninstaller ?
>
> Everything wont be listed in the uninstaller, single dll's and font changes
> wont be listed.
> The unistaller could maybe be used for Firefox, Steam etc..
I suppose winetricks could create uninstaller entries for eve
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> If you or anyone else wants to submit patches to implement a way to
> uninstall things, please go ahead. The user interface would be a
> challenge,
> though. I'd rather not have an uninstall verb for each regular verb.
> - Dan
>
>
$ wine uni
24 matches
Mail list logo
