On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Joel Holdsworth
wrote:
> Any thoughts about this patch? I guess there's a reason why 1/3 was
> merged but not 2/3 and 3/3. Anything I can fix?
It says apply failure for 3/3, so that's probably why 2/3 wasn't committed also.
Problem is that there are a lot of trans
Joel Holdsworth wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:56 +0100, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth
---
programs/winecfg/Bg.rc| 19 +
Any thoughts about this patch? I guess there's a reason why 1/3 was
merged but not 2/3 and 3/3. Anything I can fix?
Thomas,
On 7 June 2010 20:04, Thomas Heckel wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
> "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
> and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
> platforms as
Hello Dmitry,
2010/6/7 Dmitry Baryshev :
> Make wine-1.1.43 track the number of audio bytes played as a 64 bit number
> rather than a 32 bit number to avoid overflows. It may happen happen on
> constantly used audio content, possibly causing inbound voice to stop
> working
> in some voice applicat
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:56 +0100, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth
> ---
> programs/winecfg/Bg.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/Cs.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/Da.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/De.rc| 19 +
>
On 06/07/2010 09:04 PM, Thomas Heckel wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
"Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
platforms as expected.
The
Hi Alexander,
I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
"Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
platforms as expected.
Could this be the case because GetModuleHandle and t
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:38:39AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> 2010/6/5 Jacek Caban :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to share with you progress on gecko64. First of all, I think that
> > it was never said in public, although I've been asked about it: there won't
> > be gecko64 fo
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> I cannot find it the reference for it at the moment, but I remember
> that by default the stack is in memory < 4gb on 64-bits too, unless
> you did something. I wish I could remember how you could override the
> behavior, but this could b
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2512
Your paranoid android.
Mariusz Pluciński writes:
> [
> + object,
> + uuid(3887C9CA-04A0-42ae-BC4C-5FA6C7721145)
> +]
> +interface IGameStatistics : IUnknown
> +{
> +HRESULT GetCategoryTitle([in] WORD categoryIndex,
> +[out, optional] LPWSTR* pTitle);
> +
> +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2510
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2508
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2509
Your paranoid android.
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:05:09PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 6/7/10 11:41 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>I'd like to share with you progress on gecko64. First of all, I
> >>think that it was never said in public,
On 6/7/10 11:41 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to share with you progress on gecko64. First of all, I
think that it was never said in public, although I've been asked
about it: there won't be gecko64 for 1.2 release.
On 6/7/2010 13:41, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It wants MSVCP100.DLL here. Where do I get that :(
Ciao, Marcus
Does it come with VS 2010? I see no runtime redistributable for it
available.
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share with you progress on gecko64. First of all, I
> think that it was never said in public, although I've been asked
> about it: there won't be gecko64 for 1.2 release. I think we will
> have Gecko release in
Hi Jacek,
2010/6/5 Jacek Caban :
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share with you progress on gecko64. First of all, I think that
> it was never said in public, although I've been asked about it: there won't
> be gecko64 for 1.2 release. I think we will have Gecko release in the second
> half of this year
19 matches
Mail list logo
