On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Alexander Scott-Johns
wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 05:39, Austin English wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Alexander Scott-Johns
>> wrote:
>>> try 2: todo_wines removed since _vsnwprintf_s is fixed by patch 5.
>>
>> The todo_wine's need to be removed in the s
On 7 June 2010 05:39, Austin English wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Alexander Scott-Johns
> wrote:
>> try 2: todo_wines removed since _vsnwprintf_s is fixed by patch 5.
>
> The todo_wine's need to be removed in the same patch in which they are
> fixed, otherwise, the tests will "fail".
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Alexander Scott-Johns
wrote:
> try 2: todo_wines removed since _vsnwprintf_s is fixed by patch 5.
The todo_wine's need to be removed in the same patch in which they are
fixed, otherwise, the tests will "fail".
--
-Austin
Hello,
On 06-06-10 21:09, Austin English wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Andrew Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Austin English wrote:
See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23003
--
-Austin
You should probably drop the snd_pcm_hw_params_get_ac
I hate to nitpick once more, but there are a few things I noticed. My
alsa-lib tells me:
include/pcm.h:int snd_pcm_recover(snd_pcm_t *pcm, int err, int silent);
Therefore, the statement "int ret = snd_pcm_recover(NULL, NULL,
NULL);" is somewhat incorrect.
Secondly, I think it should be sufficient
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:21:33PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> --
> -Austin
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 21c0203..46ac100 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
> +/dnl Proce
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Andrew Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Austin English
> wrote:
>> See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23003
>>
>> --
>> -Austin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> You should probably drop the snd_pcm_hw_params_get_access argument
> check, both because it's not
2010/6/6 Nikolay Sivov:
You're running it with make, and a test results are from winetest runs. As I
remember winetest runs it as 'wine oleaut32_tests.exe typelib' with some env
variable to set a platform (this will enable todos output, AFAIK).
You're right. I noticed this file but I prefered do
Hi Juan,
On 6/6/10 7:35 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
Any comments and suggestions are welcomed.
One suggestion is that bugs get logged about test failures on Wine
wherever possible. Dan has done that for the chromium test suite, and
that's led to several bugs getting converted to Wine regression
2010/6/6 Nikolay Sivov :
> On 6/6/2010 21:03, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to do some (typelib) tests on wine.
>>
>> So I followed the instructions at
>> http://www.winehq.org/docs/winedev-guide/testing-wine
>> ( cd dlls/oleaut32/tests/ ; rm typelib.ok && make typelib.ok in
Hi Jacek,
> However, it doesn't mean that nothing is going on around Wine Gecko. I've
> recently switched to mingw-w64 for 32-bit builds. I've very pleased with it.
> They are far better in co-operation, don't have senseless politics like
> mingw and their quality of headers and libraries is far b
On 6/6/2010 21:03, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do some (typelib) tests on wine.
So I followed the instructions at
http://www.winehq.org/docs/winedev-guide/testing-wine
( cd dlls/oleaut32/tests/ ; rm typelib.ok && make typelib.ok in my case)
but I have err's and fixme's wherea
Hi,
I would like to do some (typelib) tests on wine.
So I followed the instructions at
http://www.winehq.org/docs/winedev-guide/testing-wine
( cd dlls/oleaut32/tests/ ; rm typelib.ok && make typelib.ok in my case)
but I have err's and fixme's whereas the output on wineTestBot is quite
differ
Mike Kronenberg wrote:
Dear List
OS X Tiger does has not have fontconfig, so I'm building it in ~/buildwine/usr
to keep it out of /usr.
I include the headers and libs from ~/buildwine/usr with CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS.
What Mike meant to say is that MacOSX does not include fontconfig
functionality
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2490
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2489
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2488
Your paranoid android.
Hey Ćukasz,
all your translations are written in UTF-8, but to actually use UTF-8,
you also have to include a
#pragma code_page(65001)
on top of the file. In this case for example
+#include "res.h"
+
+LANGUAGE LANG_POLISH, SUBLANG_DEFAULT
+
+#pragma code_page(65001)
Atm, if you compile win
> > 340 regressions<-- release announcement
> > 356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week
> > 339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
> > > 322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2)
> > > 325 regressions<-- release announcement + 4weeks
>
> As we didn't have a relea
On 06/06/2010 11:34 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
340 regressions<-- release announcement
356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week
339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3w
Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
340 regressions <-- release announcement
356 regressions <-- release announcement + 1week
339 regressions <-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
322 regressions <-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2)
325 regressions <-- release announ
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Austin English wrote:
> See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23003
>
> --
> -Austin
>
>
>
>
You should probably drop the snd_pcm_hw_params_get_access argument
check, both because it's not the function that's being tested, and
because, as far as I can tell fro
22 matches
Mail list logo