W dniu 02.06.2010 18:21, Vincent Povirk pisze:
Your change to configure.ac appears to add gameux.dll, which you don't
want to do just yet.
Right, I did not notice it. This should be part of next commit in
my local tree. Valid using git is still little problematic for me.
The patch adding the he
7 years old untouched cruft
>From 55ea3f83572b93cc580d9694ffb9d5826f8a15c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric=20Delanoy?=
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:12:07 +0200
Subject: msacm32: Remove dead "code" from rc files.
---
dlls/msacm32/msacm_Cs.rc |7 +--
dlls/msacm32/ms
Hello Marko,
thank you for your patch and welcome to Wine development.
While in general patches to make Wine use proper types are accepted
there is a slight problem with this patch.
On 06/01/2010 11:42 PM, grk...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Marko Nikolic
---
libs/wine/config.c |4 ++--
1 f
Folks,
The weekly rc schedule won't be quite weekly this week, I'll be out for
the next few days so there won't be a release this Friday. The weekly
schedule will resume with rc3 next Friday. Don't let that stop you,
there are still enough regressions for everybody...
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli
> I attached configure files, cause they're part of main
> tree. I though, that if they're intended to being generated,
> they would already be listed in .gitignore file.
> So, must I avoid sending both "configure" and "configure.ac"
> files?
The configure file is generated, and you should always
On 6/2/2010 20:07, Mariusz Pluciński wrote:
I attached configure files, cause they're part of main
tree. I though, that if they're intended to being generated,
they would already be listed in .gitignore file.
Not necessary, configure is tracked too and provided in sources tarballs.
So, must I a
2010/6/2 Mariusz Pluciński :
> You're right, but I thought about numbering too late, when
> I noticed my patches appeared in wrong order.
>
> I attached configure files, cause they're part of main
> tree. I though, that if they're intended to being generated,
> they would already be listed in .giti
You're right, but I thought about numbering too late, when
I noticed my patches appeared in wrong order.
I attached configure files, cause they're part of main
tree. I though, that if they're intended to being generated,
they would already be listed in .gitignore file.
So, must I avoid sending bo
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Seth Shelnutt wrote:
> Is there any reason that across all files we don't report the same driver
> version? Does windows not do this? Maybe it'd be easier to keep the code in
> wined3d and just have user32 and such call for the driver details? I haven't
> looked at
Is there any reason that across all files we don't report the same driver
version? Does windows not do this? Maybe it'd be easier to keep the code in
wined3d and just have user32 and such call for the driver details? I haven't
looked at how windows does it yet, but I'm just wondering if you guys ha
On 06/02/2010 09:10 AM, Hwang YunSong(황윤성) wrote:
updated
Hi,
the comments at the top look a bit funny now:
/*
* Korean resources for MSI
- *
- * Copyright 2005 YunSong Hwang
- *
+ *
+ * Copyright 2005 Mike McCormack
+ * Copyright 2010 Detlef Riekenberg
+ * Copyright 2010 YunSong Hwang
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 01:23:20 am Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reviewing Fr translation and am stuck on the 'IDS_CERT_MANIFOLD
> "Certificate Manifold"' part.
>
> I tried to STFW for it, but apart from OID for "Microsoft Enrollment
> Infrastructure", did not find explaining stuff.
>
On 05/26/2010 12:17 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>
>> I believe a reasonable alternative is to communicate directly with the
>> distro Wine packager and have them test your app against whatever
>> version of Wine they plan on shipping. That way you don't miss out on
>> good
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:14:34 +, Seth Shelnutt
> wrote:
>> I am trying to get folding at home gpu client working. The issue we are
>> having now is that it detects the driver version and says it is not
>> right, and it won't proceed. I've sear
On 06/01/2010 09:35 PM, jose rostagno wrote:
+PUSHBUTTON "Cancel",IDCANCEL,105,30,45,14,WS_GROUP
Shouldn't that be "Cancelar" ?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
15 matches
Mail list logo