Hello,
just someone informed me that I MUST NOT vote for my own bugs. Is there
a reason for it?
I like to vote for those of my own bugs which are important to me.
It really surprised me that there is this kind of rule and that it can
make your bug being closed as invalid:
http://bugs.winehq.org/
Hi,
struct MSVCRT__stat64i32 is already defined in dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.h
And these functions are also exported from msvcr80.
What would be an acceptable way to deal with this?
Best regards,
Robert
Best regards,
Robert
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 12:10 +0200, Piotr Caban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fstat64i32
On 5/25/2010 03:43, (Marvin) wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDeta
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2299
Your paranoid android.
Max wrote:
> the winelib version was quite a flop too many problems
Indeed. One should never release naked winelib apps.
Instead, one should bundle the windows version
with a private copy of Wine, like Picasa (and
now at least one other app) have done.
Il 24/05/2010 02:39, Dan Kegel ha scritto:
I've long predicted that companies might use Wine
for a while to ship Linux-compatible products,
and later switch to a native build once they know
they have users. Well, now we have at least one
example of this: Bricscad (see http://www.bricsys.com ).
On 05/24/10 17:45, Robert Wilhelm wrote:
struct MSVCRT__stat64i32 is already defined in dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.h
Struct _stat64i32 should be defined in includes/msvcrt/stat.h (this file
doesn't exist currently). When msvcr90 is compiled it searches this
directory for headers.
And these functions
On May 24, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> ICNS seems like by far the easiest image file format in existence:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Icon_Image
It's apparently slightly more complicated than that page suggests, given a
simple run-length compression scheme for image data
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2283
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2284
Your paranoid android.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>> My latest patch set (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61966,
>> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61967,
>> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61968,
>> http://sour
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> My latest patch set (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61966,
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61967,
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61968,
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/61969,
> http://source.winehq.org/patc
Hi David,
> From: David Hedberg [mailto:david.hedb...@gmail.com]
>
> I applied the patch generated by the testbot on top of master, and
> both an ordinary build and a crosstest build seems to complete fine
> for me. Am I missing something, or is the problem located elsewhere?
It's possible that
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://test
On 5/24/2010 17:13, David Hedberg wrote:
You don't test for a rectangle later, so there's no point to initialize it.
I haven't written any tests to see what ::Initialize can handle yet,
but the reasoning behind the initialization is to make sure that
ExplorerBrowser won't crash randomly du
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 5/24/2010 16:25, David Hedberg wrote:
>
> Hi, David.
>>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ULONG WINAPI IExplorerBrowser_fnRelease(IExplorerBrowser *iface)
>> +{
>> + ExplorerBrowserImpl *This = (ExplorerBrowserImpl*)iface;
>> + TRACE("This: %p\n
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2280
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2278
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2281
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2279
Your paranoid android.
On 5/24/2010 16:25, David Hedberg wrote:
Hi, David.
+}
+
+static ULONG WINAPI IExplorerBrowser_fnRelease(IExplorerBrowser *iface)
+{
+ExplorerBrowserImpl *This = (ExplorerBrowserImpl*)iface;
+TRACE("This: %p\n", This);
+
+This->ref--;
+TRACE("Ref: %d\n", This->ref);
Use inte
David Adam writes:
> From ee208ac901d7defe8ae5ddacfd4c65e36d290c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Adam
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 05:37:35 +0200
> Subject: Put private definitions in the private header
>
> ---
> dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h | 25 +
> dlls/d3drm/mes
Hi,
fstat64i32 and stat64i32 are not exported by native msvcrt.dll. This
functions should be implemented in msvcr90.
Cheers,
Piotr
Matijn Woudt wrote:
There are a few differences I spotted between the two executables:
1) setupgs-wine.exe has wrong image size, changing it from 0x2b200 to
0x2b000 makes the executable working under win7.
2) setupgs-wine.exe has wrong resource size, probably related to 1),
because the size of bo
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2276
Your paranoid android.
25 matches
Mail list logo
