Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1857
Your paranoid android.
On 5/1/2010 18:24, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
---
programs/cmd/builtins.c |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please use consistent naming for patches and mail subjects. It's
described in http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches.
I'm not sure it makes sense to rese
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>> ChangeLog:
>> Remove variable res which is not really used from test_XcvClosePort.
> We should better test for return value than remove it.
Okay. Is this something you can look into (or do you have a hint
on how you'd like such a test to look like)? I
One note of caution is that video card manufacturers have been known to
blatantly cheat on these tests by rigging their drivers with special
hacks when they detect 3dmark is running. As far as I know the code may
still be there.
Since the Linux drivers probably don't have these hacks, if they are
On 05/01/2010 08:52 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
We can't skip the EndMenu call because that would cause the test to
hang waiting for the menu to finish.
Unless there's some other way we can programmatically close the popup
menu on win95, I think we'll have to skip the whole test.
I'll give the M
We can't skip the EndMenu call because that would cause the test to
hang waiting for the menu to finish.
Unless there's some other way we can programmatically close the popup
menu on win95, I think we'll have to skip the whole test.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 04/24/2
On 04/24/2010 10:08 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
+case WM_CAPTURECHANGED:
+if (hWnd != (HWND)lParam)
+{
+got_wm_capturechanged = 1;
+EndMenu();
+}
+break;
Hi Vincent,
EndMenu is not available on Win95 so no us
I did some apples-to-apples 3d benchmarking today on a dual boot system.
It looks offhand like Windows is about twice as fast as Wine on these
benchmarks on my system.
cpu: e8400
ram: 4GB
video card: nvidia GT 240
Ubuntu 32 10.04 video drivers: 195.36.15
Vista 64 video drivers: 8.17.11.9713
On 5/1/2010 21:52, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
ChangeLog:
Remove variable res which is not really used from test_XcvClosePort.
We should better test for return value than remove it.
Okay. Is this something you can look into (or do you have
On 5/1/2010 04:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Please follow wine-devel comments:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-April/083175.html
Ouch, I had missed this message -- certainly did not mean to ignore
the good feedback.
Is the follo
10 matches
Mail list logo
