On 4/27/10 8:54 PM, C.W. Betts wrote:
> Excuse me, but why is this needed again? What IOCTL is missing in Mac OS X's
> native implementation?
Do I have to explain everything?!
All right. Here goes.
Way back in October of last year, I started a discussion on this list
about SCSI on Mac OS X:
htt
Excuse me, but why is this needed again? What IOCTL is missing in Mac OS X's
native implementation?
On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while ago on this list, I was talking about implementing SCSI support
> on Mac OS X in Wine, and we all agreed the best way to do that
> From: André Hentschel
>
> Yepp, the bot doesnt compare results with an unpatched state...
Actually, it does. It compares the results of patch jobs against the most
recent winetest.exe job for the same VM, which in this case would be
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1749. That job d
Am 27.04.2010 20:55, schrieb (Marvin):
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.win
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1768
Your paranoid android.
This patch does not apply against the current git tree. Please always
submit patches using "git format-patch".
Also, it helps if you prefix the subject with [website] so I can tell
which patches are meant for the website without scanning the body.
-Newman
Ing. Simone. Giustetti wrote:
Hi al
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1761
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1760
Your paranoid android.
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> > === W98SE (32 bit dib) ===
> > dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching.
> [...]
> > === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit dib) ===
> > dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching.
> Probably 16-bit display depth again?
Yes.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic s
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:55 +0200, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Backtrace:
> =>0 0x7ecf3750 ACTION_UnregisterMIMEInfo+0x260(package=0x131f00)
> [/home/vincent/git/wine/dlls/msi/classes.c:1516] in msi (0x0033f998)
> 1 0x7ecda25e ACTION_HandleStandardAction+0x1dd(package=,
> action="UnregisterMIME
James McKenzie wrote:
> Could you help us who are trying to match up what has changed by putting
> the module name in braces like this:
>
> [riched20]
>
> somewhere in the title?
Better to follow a commonly used patch naming convention instead:
http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches
--
Dm
11 matches
Mail list logo