On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Seth Shelnutt wrote:
> Alright after creating a few test scripts and playing around with things I
> think I have finally settled on exactly what my proposal is. It is in three
> parts,
>
> 1) Convert wpkg (or appDeploy) scripts into ahk scripts. I believe that I
>
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, k4king wrote:
>
> how seamless could the integration be made?
> I've seen a number of programs (mainly installers) and also guilty of
> writing a few win apps that shell out a dos call and return to continue.
The command prompt in windows works similar to DOS but i
how seamless could the integration be made?
I've seen a number of programs (mainly installers) and also guilty of
writing a few win apps that shell out a dos call and return to continue.
Also while wine seems to encourage a spread of apps to work, the core DosBox
guys have made it clear they are o
On Sunday 04 April 2010 3:41:00 am Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Yes, but those INT21 calls are in Win16 protected mode, not DOS real mode.
>
> And VXD ... I doubt anything uses it.
Back in the Win95 era, I remember libnet having a DOS network driver that
hooked into winsock.vxd. It allowed a DOS app
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 10:53:46AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> But Win16 applications can access DOS int 0x21 functions (below,
> tested successfully on Wine and Vista), and at least some hardware
> (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/windows/programming/vxd/ describes how a
> Win16 application can acce
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Stefan Dösinger writes:
>
>> Am 02.04.2010 um 02:08 schrieb chris ahrendt:
>>
>>> Just my 2 phennings worth on this...
>>> Why reinvent the wheel... I would say instead of doing the emulator inside
>>> wine... or a JIT... why not have
>
