Ilya Basin wrote at Feb 12, 2010 4:39 AM about Re[2]:
[PATCH] shell32/tests: add tests for the parser of SHELLEXECUTEINFO.lpFile
(resend)
>
>Thanks for review. Not sending to wine-patches this time. New patch is
>in the bottom. What's better, to attach a generated patch or to use it
>as a messa
> +dst_line[x] = 0xff00
> +| cliptobyte((c2 + r2) >> 8) << 16/* red */
> +| cliptobyte((c2 + g2) >> 8) << 8 /* green */
> +| cliptobyte((c2 + b2) >> 8); /* blue */
I'm not sure if 0xff is the correct value for the X
Thanks for review. Not sending to wine-patches this time. New patch is
in the bottom. What's better, to attach a generated patch or to use it
as a message body?
PV> On 02/11/2010 03:37 PM, Ilya Basin wrote:
>> Hi! This should expose this bug:
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19385 ( the '
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Michael Griepentrog
wrote:
> I'm primarily interested in improving the Wine experience on OS X. I read
> pages from http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX, but I'm not sure how much of that
> reflects the current direction of Wine development on Mac. What are
Paul Vriens writes:
> Just saw that your original patches where created from the
> top-level. I guess it's due to the patchwatcher site disliking non Git
> patches?
Yes, the filtering script has some issues with non-git patches that only
create new files. I put in some fixes, but using git patch
On 02/12/2010 04:41 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 02/11/2010 02:36 PM, José Manuel Ferrer Ortiz wrote:
As requested, I'll resend these patches, splitting them one message per
module. This way it looks a lot more professional :D
I've also fixed a few things that were wrong or could be better:
- Swit
On 02/11/2010 02:36 PM, José Manuel Ferrer Ortiz wrote:
As requested, I'll resend these patches, splitting them one message per
module. This way it looks a lot more professional :D
I've also fixed a few things that were wrong or could be better:
- Switched to UTF-8 encoding, and added the requir
James Mckenzie writes:
> Alexandre:
>
> libhal does not work on Macs and I don't think it works on Sparc based
> equipment. How would this work for MacOSX/Solaris?
Obviously, using whatever is the equivalent on those platforms, same way
we do for disk devices.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@w
Alexandre Julliard wrote at Feb 12, 2010 5:00 AM (Arizona Time Zone) about Re:
oldconfig.c: produce DEVICEMAP//SERIALCOMM entries
>
>A C Hurst writes:
>
>> Fixes bug 11811 [http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11811] and its
>> duplicates.
>> This patch sent some time back (over a year) was ig
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:27:38AM +, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:53:30AM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> > On 02/11/2010 05:18 PM, Huw Davies wrote:
> >> +ptr = NdrSimpleStructMarshall(&StubMsg, (unsigned char *)&memsrc,
> >> +&fmtstr_complex_array[32] );
> >
> > Hi Huw,
> >
Hi,
currently the AppDB test results include (besides the obvious wine related
fields) only the distribution as distinguishing attribute for a test(er).
Now, my view point is the game(r) perspective. Maybe that's far too narrow, but
still...
Many times I looked at test results and wished to
On 02/12/2010 01:28 PM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2010 12:15:48 Paul Vriens wrote:
Changelog
Fix a test failure on Win9x/WinMe
Can you find the string "msi test font" anywhere in the registry after
running that test?
-Hans
Wait, this is probably because you used W-f
On Friday 12 February 2010 12:15:48 Paul Vriens wrote:
> Changelog
>Fix a test failure on Win9x/WinMe
Can you find the string "msi test font" anywhere in the registry after
running that test?
-Hans
On 02/12/2010 12:39 PM, Ilya Basin wrote:
Thanks for review. Not sending to wine-patches this time. New patch is
in the bottom. What's better, to attach a generated patch or to use it
as a message body?
Depends on your mail client I guess. I usually attach but there are
others who inline.
P
A C Hurst writes:
> Fixes bug 11811 [http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11811] and its
> duplicates.
> This patch sent some time back (over a year) was ignored/lost in noise.
> Could someone review please?
It has already been explained that this belongs in mountmgr, and should
be based on t
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:53:30AM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 02/11/2010 05:18 PM, Huw Davies wrote:
>> +ptr = NdrSimpleStructMarshall(&StubMsg, (unsigned char *)&memsrc,
>> +&fmtstr_complex_array[32] );
>
> Hi Huw,
>
> This particular test crashes on Win9x, WinMe and NT4.
>
> They all show
On 02/11/2010 05:18 PM, Huw Davies wrote:
+ptr = NdrSimpleStructMarshall(&StubMsg, (unsigned char *)&memsrc,
+&fmtstr_complex_array[32] );
Hi Huw,
This particular test crashes on Win9x, WinMe and NT4.
They all show:
ndr_marshall.c:1973: Test failed: length 96
just before the crash so ma
Dan Kegel writes:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/programs/cmd/tests/test_dp0.cmd
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +...@echo off
> +echo Begin test for bug 21382
> +rem On old wine, ~dp0 was always current directory rather than "directory
> containing batch file"
> +echo %~dp0
> +mkdir dummydir
> +cd dummydir
> +ec
Hi,
I'm interested in contributing to Wine, and I'm posting here for guidance on
how to get started. I'll start off with a bit about myself: I'm currently a
senior majoring in Computer Science at the University of Wisconsin - Madison
and will be graduating in May. Most of my upper-level coursew
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
>> Hi, all:
>>
>> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
>> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
>> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
>> c
On 02/11/2010 03:37 PM, Ilya Basin wrote:
Hi! This should expose this bug:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19385 ( the 'wine start'
launcher does not open MS Office documents that have spaces in their
path ). Although the title is misleading, many other tickets are
marked as duplicates of
21 matches
Mail list logo
