"Ilya Shpigor" wrote:
+SendMessageA(hWnd, WM_SETTEXT, 0, (LPARAM)str);
+SendMessageA(hWnd, WM_GETTEXT, MAXLEN, (LPARAM)buf);
+ok(!lstrcmp(buf, str), "Wrong contents of edit: %s\n", buf);
+lstrcpy(buf, "");
+SendMessageA(hWnd, WM_DESTROY, 0, 0);
+SendMessageA(hWnd, WM_GET
"Nikolay Sivov" wrote:
This fixes a leak spotted by valgrind.
Changelog:
- free window text to prevent leak in case when WM_NCDESTROY
doesn't get to default procedure
Then WM_NCDESTROY handler should be removed from DefWindowProc
to avoid a confusing duplication.
--
Dmitry.
Hi Ben,
did you see
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15679
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-October/079842.html
?
IMHO the way the Samba sources merged the fd and filename
version of the calls makes for less duplication of code.
(I tried to do it the other way first, and it
All:
I continue to work with Tony Rollo's code as presented in bug 6254. I've
found a problem with Wordpad's Print Preview between wine-1.1.10 and
wine-1.1.11 and I attempted to run a regression test and end up with
errors in makedep.c as follows:
makedep.c:21:20: error: config.h: No such file or
> To my knowledge the integration of the patches by Mounir IDRASSI has been
> rejected due to missing automated tests. This is a problem since for a full
> test someone has to write/provide an IFD handler which emulates some stuff.
IIRC, there was also a problem with the way it integration was don
All:
I continue to work with Tony Rollo's code as presented in bug 6254. I've
found a problem with Wordpad's Print Preview between wine-1.1.10 and
wine-1.1.11 and I attempted to run a regression test and end up with
errors in makedep.c as follows:
makedep.c:21:20: error: config.h: No such file or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What are your thoughts on using Extended Attributes for items such as:
* Dos Attributes (like samba's "store dos attributes = yes")
* File Creation Times (like samba's proposed user.crtime)
* An option for alternate storage of NT ACLs (like samba's "vf
Hi Anders,
Your patch changes to two different dlls in one patch. In general a
patch should only change one thing. It would be nice if you could
separate it because else I'm not sure if it will be added.
Roderick
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Anders Jonsson
wrote:
> Fixes some typos in comc
Hi Marcus,
A couple of hours ago I submitted a patch rewrites the function. It
suffers from the same 'issue'. This and any other wgl function are
called from gdi32/opengl.c which perform magic to arrive here and in
case of wglsharelists it also performs the filtering.
Roderick
On Sun, Nov 15, 20
Valgrind has a nice option --freelist_vol which is the
total size of blocks to hold on the freed block queue.
It does this to help detect double free errors.
Where in Wine's heap would one want to keep a free list
like that? My first idea is to just add another element
to the freeList array; rat
Ah, I only checked refcount.c.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> Am 15.11.2009 um 20:55 schrieb Vincent Povirk:
>
>>
>>
>> <0001-ddraw-tests-Add-test-for-refcounts-of-surface-object.txt>
> I think we already have tests for that - see IFaceRefCount() in dsurface.c
>
>
>
>
Am 15.11.2009 um 20:55 schrieb Vincent Povirk:
>
>
> <0001-ddraw-tests-Add-test-for-refcounts-of-surface-object.txt>
I think we already have tests for that - see IFaceRefCount() in dsurface.c
To my knowledge the integration of the patches by Mounir IDRASSI has been
rejected due to missing automated tests. This is a problem since for a full
test someone has to write/provide an IFD handler which emulates some stuff.
So far I haven't found some kind of virtual card reader - maybe attach
> I think you misunderstood me. The window is created but as you're
> searching for a "Startup" window's title it fails on localized
> systems. So the test is not completely correct and only work on
> English system. That's why I proposed to skip the two tests on (and
> only on) such systems.
I ha
Julius wrote:
>With one file however (GOODTIME.AVI from the win95 cd) I get this
> error after about a second:
> err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x11: in-use arena 0x184420
> next block has PREV_FREE flag
> non enough memory
>
> I have no idea where this comes from and why it happens. (It
2009/11/15 Mikey Alexander :
> You really don't want to skip this one as the api is supposed to create the
> window, but you can't be absolutely sure it is a failure, hence the error
> message being what it is. If you are going to skip the timeout if it fails,
> why bother checking for the wind
Hi,
I'm working on fixing some things in avifil32. Several problems should
be gone when using the attached four patches and most AVI files play
back properly.
With one file however (GOODTIME.AVI from the win95 cd) I get this error
after about a second:
err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Di, 2009-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
I will add tests to show this and submit the patches then.
I created a test for avifil32 in June 2008, but it was not comitted.
( http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056310.html )
Thank
You really don't want to skip this one as the api is supposed to create the
window, but you can't be absolutely sure it is a failure, hence the error
message being what it is. If you are going to skip the timeout if it fails,
why bother checking for the window creation at all?
The real questio
Please don't commit this test. Instead use or comment next try:
user32: Destroy EDITSTATE structure in the WM_NCDESTROY message processing
--
Best regards,
Ilya Shpigor.
20 matches
Mail list logo
