All:
I've been attempting to bring Tony Rollo's EM_FORMATRANGE patch up to
date and got to Wine 1.1.6. At the suggestion of Dylan Smith, I have
been using Wordpad to test the patch after adding a little test because
of poor display on the Print Preview. However, I've run into two what
appears to
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> I looked into this in more detail, and now remember why I couldn't
> do this.
>
> From X11DRV_GetDIBits() we invoke DIB_GetBitmapInfo() with these
> two variables being passed by addresses which in turns forwards to
> DIB_GetBitmapInfoEx(). And there we have a default c
JesusFreke wrote:
> I'll be honest, I don't know if this is the correct way to fix this issue.
> But with this patch, the mouse movement is working perfectly.
Have you tried disabling warping in dinput?
Your patch is an outright hack. It does something that is plain wrong. I do
know that area of t
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:37 PM, JesusFreke wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
> wrote:
>>
>> JesusFreke wrote:
>> > ---
>> > dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c | 1 +
>> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c b/dl
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com a écrit :
Eric,
I wrote:
However, it[Wine's MCI] still hangs in the full tests. I believe the last bug
in mciwave
will only be nailed down once the play and record loops manage to talk robustly
with other commands such as pause and close.
A recent ide
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
> JesusFreke wrote:
> > ---
> > dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c |1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c
> > index 60351e5..7c24c64 100644
> > --- a/dl
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com a écrit :
Hi,
IIRC, I never tested µ-law wave file, so it may well be that the ACM
converter is broken
What is the policy for including sample multimedia files in Wine?
E.g., I remember tests being skipped because msrle.avi is not present:
http://www.w
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Nathan Gallaher
wrote:
> Could someone give me a pointer as to how you reproduce this trace? I've
> spent some time fiddling with valgrind, the WINETEST_WRAPPER env var, and
> --enable-maintainer-mode, all to no avail.
I use
http://code.google.com/p/winezeug/sour
JesusFreke wrote:
> ---
> dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c
> index 60351e5..7c24c64 100644
> --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c
> +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c
> @@ -1004,6 +1004
André Hentschel wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen schrieb:
>> André Hentschel wrote:
>>> diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>>> index 010e1a6..08eaf73 100644
>>> --- a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>>> +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>>> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ char * CDECL _ecvt( double number, int ndigits, i
Could someone give me a pointer as to how you reproduce this trace? I've
spent some time fiddling with valgrind, the WINETEST_WRAPPER env var, and
--enable-maintainer-mode, all to no avail.
~Nate
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Dan Kegel wrote:
Hi Nate,
your patch seems to have caused new valgrind war
Am 29.10.2009 um 21:29 schrieb Luis C. Busquets Pérez:
Dear all,
Since d3d10effect has advanced a lot during the latest weeks I was
wondering what are the next steps that you are planning to develop.
I'm still working on d3d9-related stuff only, no guarantees that the
following is correct
On Sa, 2009-10-24 at 22:07 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> This is about the fifth article of this sort, so it's not really news
> anymore, but it's still fun to read about.
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/10/24/1759213/Now-Linux-Can-Get-Viruses-Via-Wine
The blogger mention the bad website, but the
On Saturday 31 October 2009 11:10:35 Michael Martin wrote:
> Understand,
> I guess ill write some wine test to check different return values for
> differences on mapped files.
> Can you give me a pointer on where this would best fit in?
> kernel32/tests/file.c: test_CopyFileW, or should i make
Vitaliy Margolen schrieb:
> André Hentschel wrote:
>> diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>> index 010e1a6..08eaf73 100644
>> --- a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>> +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
>> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ char * CDECL _ecvt( double number, int ndigits, int
>> *decpt, int *sign )
>>
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
> 2009/10/31 André Hentschel :
>> So that there are no warnings if tests only use the constant variables in
>> that header.
>> ---
>> dlls/comctl32/tests/v6util.h |4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/tests/v6util.
On Saturday 31 October 2009 05:22:31 you wrote:
> I haven't came across an installer yet that fails on WINE because of this.
> I have jumped ahead a bit here.
>
> Regardless, if a file has been mapped by using CreateFileMapping/MapViewOfFile
> and the CopyFile api (having the last parameter as FA
Charles Davis writes:
> I thought I fixed all the issues. What's wrong with my patches now?
Many things, it's a lot more complicated than that. For instance you
can't just kill the fstab support, this needs to be preserved somehow,
probably on the mountmgr side. Also you can't have a single file
18 matches
Mail list logo