On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Code, which is called very often, should produce as less overhead as
> possible. I suggest to use "static inline".
I have 'static' already. The compiler's probably better at
deciding when to use inline than we are, may as well
leave in
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Looking at the code I'm 99.9% sure this should be a logical and here
in this new code.
Gerald
ChangeLog:
Use local and instead of bitwise and in MONTHCAL_SetDayFocus().
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/monthcal.c b/dlls/comctl32/monthcal.c
index a35d261..cd8bd7f 100644
--- a/d
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:37 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > You can do it at window creation time, but you can't
> > change the window back and forth just because you want some move request
> > to not be intercepted.
> >
> Eh? Did you read the xlib manual i linked to? This is *ex
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> + TRACE("fd %d, name %s, attrib %x\n", fd, debugstr_a(unix_fname),
> *pattrib);
> + *pattrib = attributes;
>
> Any reason you're tracing *pattrib before you set it?
Fixed, thanks!
> + * If unix_fname is not NULL, DIR_is_hidden_file is cal
Hi Paul,
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
I've been looking at the tests reports and we seem to have a few
spurious errors:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/urlmon:protocol.html
The ones I mean are:
protocol.c:2535: Testing http protocol (direct read)...
protocol.c:497: Test failed: unexpecte
Hi Jacek,
I've been looking at the tests reports and we seem to have a few
spurious errors:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/urlmon:protocol.html
The ones I mean are:
protocol.c:2535: Testing http protocol (direct read)...
protocol.c:497: Test failed: unexpected call Switch
and
protocol.c
> Which test fails on the other Windows versions?
That's available if you follow the link Paul sent. The failing test is:
sti.c:221: Test failed: CoCreateInstance unexpectedly succeeded when
querying for IUnknown during aggregation
and it's failing on Win98, XP, and 2003.
--Juan
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 10/05/2009 09:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>
>> Changelog:
>> * add aggregation tests for the IStillImageW interface
>>
>> Unchanged since last time.
>>
>> Damjan Jovanovic
>>
>>
>> -
On 10/05/2009 09:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Changelog:
* add aggregation tests for the IStillImageW interface
Unchanged since last time.
Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Damjan,
This patch introduced a test failure on all Win
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Roderick Colenbrander
wrote:
> Esstentially what happens is that using the SendMessage in
> internal_SetPixelFormat we call 'set_win_format' in window.c. I can't
> say why it fails perhaps no parent window is up yet..
>
> Roderick
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:02
Esstentially what happens is that using the SendMessage in
internal_SetPixelFormat we call 'set_win_format' in window.c. I can't
say why it fails perhaps no parent window is up yet..
Roderick
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM, a qi wrote:
>
> Hi,All
>
> I try to run a 3D application named "Unity
Hi,All
I try to run a 3D application named "Unity 3d" with Wine, but failed.
And there is already a bug report about that:
Bug 18061 - Unity Indie Trial Editor window contents not drawn
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18061
Now I try to find out the reason.
So, I follow the error
Paul Vriens writes:
> Looks like a time/timing issue. Putting a Sleep(100) after the
> ScrollWindowEx makes the tests pass as well.
>
> Is that acceptable?
Yes, though maybe a flush_events() would be better.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 10/06/2009 12:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens writes:
On 10/06/2009 11:51 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens writes:
Hi,
Resending as I didn't receive any comments.
Apparently most Win9x and WinMe boxes running under VMware have this issue.
Changelog
Fix some
Hello,
> You can do it at window creation time, but you can't
> change the window back and forth just because you want some move request
> to not be intercepted.
>
Eh? Did you read the xlib manual i linked to? This is *exactly* what
they recommend for this type of scenario:
http://tronche.com/gu
I am posting your response, as you are not on CC in the bug.
>>You can't do that sort of thing. If you really don't want the window
manager to
>>control the windows there's an option for it, but you can't have it both ways.
I am not sure i agree. Everywhere i looked they referred to "override_red
Peter Dons Tychsen writes:
> I am posting your response, as you are not on CC in the bug.
>
>>>You can't do that sort of thing. If you really don't want the window
> manager to
>>>control the windows there's an option for it, but you can't have it both
>>>ways.
>
> I am not sure i agree. Everywh
Ge van Geldorp writes:
> Changelog:
> d3d10core/tests: Add acceptable error code for Win7 device test
So why does it fail?
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Ge van Geldorp writes:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078113.html got
> sucked into the wine-patches black hole.
>
> Changelog:
>dinput/tests: Add acceptable error code for Win7 mouse test
That's not an acceptable error for that test. Why does it fail?
--
Ale
Paul Vriens writes:
> Hi,
>
> Resending as I didn't receive any comments.
>
> Apparently most Win9x and WinMe boxes running under VMware have this issue.
>
> Changelog
> Fix some test failures with 9x/Me on VMware
That makes the test essentially useless.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq
Ge van Geldorp writes:
> Changelog:
> ntdll/tests: Fix exception test failure on Win7
That's way overkill for a single failure. You should figure out what's
going on in this specific case and adapt the test.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Ge van Geldorp writes:
> Changelog:
> kernel32/tests: Check expected last error before calling lstrcmpA() since
> it may reset GLE
Then it doesn't make sense to print it either. You should split the
check.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Ge van Geldorp writes:
> Changelog:
> kernel32/tests: Add acceptable error codes for Win7 resource test
That defeats the purpose of the test.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> If you prefer, I'll be happy to convert the code into a switch statement.
> Just let me know!
That would certainly be more elegant.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
