Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?

2009-06-26 Thread Kai Blin
On Saturday 27 June 2009 02:16:42 Dan Kegel wrote: > If anyone's at LinuxTag, maybe it would be worth wandering over to > Halle 7.2a, Stand 111 and chat the projects up to see if any > of them have any interest in Wine... Ah, damn, that was like a day late. I won't make it in time today. However,

Appinstall caught a (fixed) bug

2009-06-26 Thread Austin English
Whlie checking logs today, I noticed something interesting: All tests passed builtin-gui-result.txt:Error window didn't appear. Bug 19081 fixed. TODO_FIXED. builtin-gui-result.txt:Error window didn't appear. Bug 19081 fixed. TODO_FIXED. kmeleon-152-result.txt:k-meleon.exe didn't crash. Bug 17524 TO

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/27 Dan Kegel : > (What's missing is the ability to add howto's and notes at the > application level, i.e. one level higher than the version level where > they all go right now, but that's not usually a dealbreaker.) I like the sound of this! What's the feasibility of letting supermaintainer

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/27 Susan Cragin : > OK, but Version 9 should be re-numbered to 9.0 Preferred, with a note that > version was superseded by 9.5, and new copies purchased will most likely be > 9.5. Done.

Regression on OS X, may not be able to load dll

2009-06-26 Thread Gellule Xg
Hi, (wine, almost latest git, on OS X) Trying to test the latest changes on the loader memory management with Ryzom (which I had some OpenGL related out of memory issues), I stumbled on the following: "wine client_ryzom_rd.exe" crashes with: DBG 9 dynloadlib.cpp 211 NLMISC::CLibrary::lo

Regression on OS X, may not be able to load native dll

2009-06-26 Thread Gellule Xg
Hi, (wine, almost latest git, on OS X) Trying to test the latest changes on the loader memory management with Ryzom (which I had some OpenGL related out of memory issues), I stumbled on the following: "wine client_ryzom_rd.exe" crashes with the following. DBG 9 dynloadlib.cpp 211 NLMISC

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Mike Kronenberg
On 26.06.2009, at 16:51, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Emmanuel Maillard" wrote: Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not GPL but LGPL. Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we never change Wine licensing in Darwine. Darwine site claims that

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Ladenlokal Velbert
On 26 Jun 2009, at 10:29, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Maik Schulz" wrote: IMHO, it would be sufficient to add a "not supported by winehq.org" disclaimer next to the mention. If there currently is no binary distribution that packs the vanilla wine tree then you're making it unnecessarily

Re: wine 1.1.23 configure message Mac OSX 10.5.7

2009-06-26 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:29 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > Austin English wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Maurits Lamers >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while running configure of wine 1.1.23 on Mac OSX Leopard 10.5.7 the message >>> below appeared with a request to mail it. >>> Running XCod

re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Dan Kegel
A few comments: 1. I agree that it is useful to remove obsolete, uninformative comments in the appdb. (You have to be careful to leave the old informative ones, though; if somebody has a great workaround or bug that might still be useful, don't delete it.) 2. The wiki is not the place for appdb

Re: wine 1.1.23 configure message Mac OSX 10.5.7

2009-06-26 Thread James McKenzie
Austin English wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Maurits Lamers wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> while running configure of wine 1.1.23 on Mac OSX Leopard 10.5.7 the message >> below appeared with a request to mail it. >> Running XCode 3.1.2, i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1. Please feel free to >> con

Anyone at LinuxTag?

2009-06-26 Thread Dan Kegel
According to http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Bund-foerdert-Open-Source-Projekte--/meldung/141175 Germany's going to put 20 million euros into open source. They'll probably throw it all down a rathole, but hey, maybe some small fraction will go to useful projects. If anyone's at LinuxTag, maybe it w

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:10 PM, David Gerard wrote: > 2009/6/27 Austin English : >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roderick >> Colenbrander wrote: > >>> If they ship hacks like the DIB engine then we won't accept bug >>> reports for it as it a real big hack and shouldn't be linked to from >>> ou

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread David Gerard
2009/6/27 Austin English : > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roderick > Colenbrander wrote: >> If they ship hacks like the DIB engine then we won't accept bug >> reports for it as it a real big hack and shouldn't be linked to from >> our website. Tweaking themes or icons is fine. Actually we just

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > If they ship hacks like the DIB engine then we won't accept bug > reports for it as it a real big hack and shouldn't be linked to from > our website. Tweaking themes or icons is fine. Actually we just need > to refine our .msstyles sup

Usage of wine-tests-results mailing list

2009-06-26 Thread Frédéric Delanoy
Hi, looking at the different mailing lists of wine on http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo, I found that wine-tests-results seems only filled with garbage (actually "[ERROR] winetest error report"). Has that list any use these days? Frédéric

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Steven Edwards
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > If they ship hacks like the DIB engine then we won't accept bug > reports for it as it a real big hack and shouldn't be linked to from > our website. Tweaking themes or icons is fine. Actually we just need > to refine our .msstyles sup

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Steven Edwards wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Dmitry > Timoshkov wrote: >> Darwine site claims that it's under GPL. In any case different name means >> a different product regardless of claims and intentions. Darwine is not >> Wine, plain and simple. > >

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Steven Edwards
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Darwine site claims that it's under GPL. In any case different name means > a different product regardless of claims and intentions. Darwine is not > Wine, plain and simple. I have a Mac that I've given Austin English access to for his Wi

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Susan Cragin
>> Version 9 should be entirely deleted. That refers to the early 9.0 Preferred >> release, which is not available any more. 9.0 Preferred has been replaced by >> 9.5 Preferred, which is garbage like Standard. We should not have people >> buying DNS 9 Preferred  and thinking it is installable when

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Remco
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Luke Benstead wrote: > I personally think a Slashdot style system (like mentioned earlier) is > perfect for this. If users rated posts up and down, and there is a > customizable threshold above which the comments are visible. Then the > most relevant and useful post

Re: Strange issue with recv in Launchpad Enhanced

2009-06-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Erich Hoover wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Erich Hoover wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Erich Hoover wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Damjan Jovanovic >>> wrote: ... Maybe the memory is writable but no

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 17:10, Susan Cragin wrote: > With regard to Dragon NaturallySpeaking, I have the following comments. > ... > Version 9 should be entirely deleted. That refers to the early 9.0 Preferred > release, which is not available any more. 9.0 Preferred has been replaced by > 9.5 Pref

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:51, Pauli Nieminen wrote: > Then also add automatic system that removes points from comments based > on how old they are. I don't have any good number for this now but > feeling is that for high traffic applications something like a point > per week might work while low t

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Chris Morgan
>> >> I have found that many of the "useless" comments show up as good Google >> searches when I'm looking up errors.  This kind of behavior has been >> incredibly useful in the past for figuring out what to do with a bug I've >> encountered.  Unfortunately, lately it's been much harder for me to u

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Luke Benstead
2009/6/26 Erich Hoover : > 2009/6/26 Ken Sharp >> >> >> Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote: >> >>> It's important to note that the script would also have warned maintainers >>> that there are queued items for the apps they maintain. >>> >> >> Yup, but queued data is also listed down the left of the

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Erich Hoover
2009/6/26 Ken Sharp > > > Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote: > > It's important to note that the script would also have warned maintainers >> that there are queued items for the apps they maintain. >> >> > Yup, but queued data is also listed down the left of the page, and an email > is sent to t

Re: clock: Reset default codepage in utf8 rc file

2009-06-26 Thread Paul Chitescu
On Friday 26 June 2009 18:36:38 Paul Vriens wrote: > Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> Paul Chitescu writes: > >>> I just checked the patch I've sent to wine-patches and it had #pragma > >>> code_page(default) at the end <...> > >> > >> I

Re: clock: Reset default codepage in utf8 rc file

2009-06-26 Thread Paul Vriens
Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Paul Chitescu writes: I just checked the patch I've sent to wine-patches and it had #pragma code_page(default) at the end <...> I removed it because it's not needed now that the resource files are compiled in

Re: clock: Reset default codepage in utf8 rc file

2009-06-26 Thread Frédéric Delanoy
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Paul Chitescu writes: > >> I just checked the patch I've sent to wine-patches and it had #pragma >> code_page(default) at the end <...> > > I removed it because it's not needed now that the resource files are > compiled individually for

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Emmanuel Maillard" wrote: Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not GPL but LGPL. Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we never change Wine licensing in Darwine. Darwine site claims that it's under GPL. In any case different name means a di

Re: user32/tests: Add more intensive tests for SetCursor.

2009-06-26 Thread Daniel Santos
lol! I guess it's time for me to remove myself from the mailing lists I don't read anymore, I'm starting to miss replies! Anyway, I'm off for the weekend, but will rebase and re-send (with attachment) Monday or so. Thanks for the response Austin! Daniel --- On Tue, 6/9/09, Austin English w

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Emmanuel Maillard
Hi, Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not GPL but LGPL. Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we never change Wine licensing in Darwine. Emmanuel Le 26 juin 09 à 05:19, Dmitry Timoshkov a écrit : wrote: Yesterday I edited http://wiki.

As of Thursday's git, DNS runs for a bit longer.

2009-06-26 Thread Susan Cragin
I have been timing Dragon NaturallySpeaking to see how fast it crashes. I start when I click on the program, and use it pretty steadily until it crashes. As of yesterday's git, it runs for about 15 minutes and 30 seconds. That's an improvement of two minutes over previous versions. :) Susan

Re: Alpha Roadblocks

2009-06-26 Thread Freddie Tilley
2009/6/26 Stefan Dösinger > Am Friday 26 June 2009 11:56:54 schrieb Joel Holdsworth: > > I'm pretty sure that fixing the blts would be a major job, but I thought > > I'd write and ask for some comments. Is it so hard as I think? Does > > anyone have any ideas what would be required? > Isn't the p

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Ken Sharp
Remco wrote: Yes, I should have been more clear that the test data would be different from the wiki-like sections of the page, and still be accepted by admins/maintainers. The only thing I would like to see as a wiki, is the rest of the page: descriptions, screenshots, notes. But the test dat

Re: Alpha Roadblocks

2009-06-26 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Friday 26 June 2009 11:56:54 schrieb Joel Holdsworth: > I'm pretty sure that fixing the blts would be a major job, but I thought > I'd write and ask for some comments. Is it so hard as I think? Does > anyone have any ideas what would be required? Isn't the problem that X11 cannot handle alpha in

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Ken Sharp
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote: It's important to note that the script would also have warned maintainers that there are queued items for the apps they maintain. Yup, but queued data is also listed down the left of the page, and an email is sent to the maintainer for every test result,

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Remco
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Ben Klein wrote: >> Maybe that [AppDB] could be governed more like a wiki > > There has been talk about AppDB being more wiki-like, but it's not > really suitable when the primary information is test data which is so > specific it does not change (e.g. "Gold in 1.1.

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Fredag 26 juni 2009 03:24:31 skrev Ken Sharp: > Austin English wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Vitaliy > > > > Margolen wrote: > >> Ken Sharp wrote: > >>> Because it's bloody obvious or THEY [comments] WOULDN'T BE REMOVED LONG > >>> BEFORE I STARTED DOING IT. > >> > >> I've never seen a

Re: [5/10] d3dx9: Implement D3DXLoadSurfaceFromSurface

2009-06-26 Thread Tony Wasserka
> Watch out, some surfaces aren't lockable. I don't know the d3dx9 api too > well, > but are you sure that you have a lockable surface here? > In some situations IDirect3DDevice9::UpdateSurface or > IDirect3DDevice9::StretchRect may be a faster way to achieve what this code > does(without color

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Austin English wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:56 AM, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less >> outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all >> references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine

Alpha Roadblocks

2009-06-26 Thread Joel Holdsworth
Hi All, Some of you may have read some of my recent mails about my work to refresh the wine icons with Tango versions, as demonstrated in this screenshot: http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/alpha-tango-icons.png Achieving this task isn't a simple icon replacement job, because of the inability of wine

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-26 Thread Pauli Nieminen
Hi everyone! I wanted to give my option about how to solve the problems. I think the problem is in code instead of in people. :) Making comments rating system to AppDB would be useful. Simple idea to make this happen would be add a rate up button for all users (even guests). select X highest rate

oleaut32:usrmarshal tests on Win95

2009-06-26 Thread Paul Vriens
Hi, I'm looking into the failures for the usrmarshal tests on Win95. The attached patch shows the differences between NT+ and Win95. I'm not able to pinpoint the correct way to fix these failures yet. Some other results: - older Win98 boxes behave the same as Win95 - newer Win98 boxes and Win

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Make sure queries have an active GL context.

2009-06-26 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/6/26 Henri Verbeet : > 2009/6/26 Stefan Dösinger : >> Am Friday 26 June 2009 10:07:08 schrieb Henri Verbeet: >>> +    ActivateContext(This->wineD3DDevice, >>> This->wineD3DDevice->lastActiveRenderTarget, CTXUSAGE_RESOURCELOAD); + >>>      if (((WineQueryOcclusionData *)This->extendedData)->ctx

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Make sure queries have an active GL context.

2009-06-26 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/6/26 Stefan Dösinger : > Am Friday 26 June 2009 10:07:08 schrieb Henri Verbeet: >> +    ActivateContext(This->wineD3DDevice, >> This->wineD3DDevice->lastActiveRenderTarget, CTXUSAGE_RESOURCELOAD); + >>      if (((WineQueryOcclusionData *)This->extendedData)->ctx != >> This->wineD3DDevice->acti

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Make sure queries have an active GL context.

2009-06-26 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Friday 26 June 2009 10:07:08 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > +    ActivateContext(This->wineD3DDevice, > This->wineD3DDevice->lastActiveRenderTarget, CTXUSAGE_RESOURCELOAD); + >      if (((WineQueryOcclusionData *)This->extendedData)->ctx != > This->wineD3DDevice->activeContext || > This->wineD3DDevice

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Maik Schulz" wrote: IMHO, it would be sufficient to add a "not supported by winehq.org" disclaimer next to the mention. If there currently is no binary distribution that packs the vanilla wine tree then you're making it unnecessarily difficult to obtain a binary distribution for the Mac O

Re: Potential patch for an oddity in dlls/d3d9/device.c

2009-06-26 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/6/25 Gerald Pfeifer : > So, I wonder whether something like the patch below is the right fix, or > whether there is a deeper problem? > That fix is correct.

Re: why is Kronenberg's Wine/Mac work blacklisted on winehq?

2009-06-26 Thread Maik Schulz
Hi Jörg, Juan, On 25 Jun 2009, at 22:05, Juan Lang wrote: Greetings Jörg, Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at http://www.