On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
> VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
> its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and every single ker
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Austin English wrote:
> AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
> __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
> have a look?
Bah you beat me reporting this by 13mins!
:P
--
Steven Edwards
"There is one thing
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: master
> Commit: 857f1e0924f23865038a608ee6834ef524371f20
> URL:
> http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=857f1e0924f23865038a608ee6834ef524371f20
>
> Author: Alexandre Julliard
> Date: Thu J
AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
have a look?
gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclaration-after-statement
2009/6/12 chris ahrendt :
>
> Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2009/6/11 chris ahrendt :
>>
>>> to see what patch caused the failure on non NVIDIA cards?
>>>
>>
>> Where's the rest of your message? Oh, I see, it's in the subject.
>>
>> Wasn't there already a thread about this?
>>
>> Back on topic, if it is defi
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> Just installed VirtualBox and it does have snaphots but not so extensive as
> VMware. In VMware I have some W2K snapshots:
>
> - out-of-the-box
> - SP1
> - SP2
> - SP3
> - SP4 + Windows Update
>
> I can freely choose which I want to go to. Not so with VirtualBox I'm afraid
2009/6/11 chris ahrendt :
>
> to see what patch caused the failure on non NVIDIA cards?
Where's the rest of your message? Oh, I see, it's in the subject.
Wasn't there already a thread about this?
Back on topic, if it is definitely a regression then a regression test
on bugzilla will be useful. O
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Igor Tarasov" wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/9 Austin English :
>>>
>>> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
>>> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
>>> information.
>>
>> Maybe just add notic
2009/6/11 Vladimir Pankratov :
> Hello all.
>
> Implemented ExtractFilesW
>
> Changed files:
> advpack/files.c
>
+if (GetFileAttributesA(ExpandDir) == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES)
+return HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND);
Why are you testing this in ExtractFilesA? Almost all of
Forwarding to mailing list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Danila Sentiabov
Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:02
Subject: Re: RDo we still need the regression test for 1.1.23 ?
To: chris ahrendt
I didn't follow the topic, but as far as I know, if there is a regression
it's surely
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/6/11 Austin English :
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
>>> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
>>> doesn't wor
2009/6/11 Austin English :
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
>> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
>> doesn't work and the VirtualBox developers admit it but consider the
>>
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting older
> Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
Yeah. Try QEMU without KVM on a very fast host machine, your ancient
Windows should run just as well as it would on a 486 ;-)
- d.
On 06/11/2009 02:58 PM, David Gerard wrote:
2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniuc:
Paul Vriens wrote:
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware.
Suggestions, recommendations?
I'm using KVM/Qemu with libvirt
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ken Sharp wrote:
> Attachments can be deleted, can comments be deleted?
No. They're archived all over the interwebs anyway, there is no point.
I support this patch.
--
-Austin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
> doesn't work and the VirtualBox developers admit it but consider the
> bug beneath their attention. It's
Rein Klazes wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:30:57 +0400, you wrote:
>
>>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
>> There's nothing about why it's so important. These 25, 35 or 20 lines to
>> allow means nothing.
>> Actually I don't see any problem here, and, yes, I'm subscribed on
>> wine
2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniuc :
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>> I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
>> winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware.
>> Suggestions, recommendations?
> I'm using KVM/Qemu with libvirt aka virt-manager. I have problems wi
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/11 Paul Vriens:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
>>> Workstation.
>>>
>>> VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
>>> fixing/patching
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:30:57 +0400, you wrote:
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
>There's nothing about why it's so important. These 25, 35 or 20 lines to
>allow means nothing.
>Actually I don't see any problem here, and, yes, I'm subscribed on
>wine-bugs list and this full log pas
On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens:
Hi,
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows ve
Ken Sharp wrote:
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
What is the purpose of that change? To reduce mailed amount or what?
To improve readability of reports?
Log quotation are very useful sometimes and this blocking only makes
things harder for people who knows
what they're pasting.
http://bugs.winehq.o
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
What is the purpose of that change? To reduce mailed amount or what? To
improve readability of reports?
Log quotation are very useful sometimes and this blocking only makes
things harder for people who knows
what they're pasting.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Ken Sharp wrote:
I must have missed this. This would be incredibly useful.
Does this affect all users though? Anastasius Focht would probably go
over these limits but his comments are helpful.
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
The limits are:
20 lines for logs (fixme, trace,
I must have missed this. This would be incredibly useful.
Does this affect all users though? Anastasius Focht would probably go
over these limits but his comments are helpful.
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
The limits are:
20 lines for logs (fixme, trace, err, warn)
10 lin
Paul Vriens wrote:
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and
Damjan Jovanovic writes:
> @@ -882,7 +882,11 @@ static BOOL write_menu_file(const char *filename)
>
> while (1)
> {
> +char *tmpdir = getenv("TMPDIR");
> +unsetenv("TMPDIR");
> tempfilename = tempnam(xdg_config_dir, "_wine");
> +if (tmpdir)
> +
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
>>= '0' || <= '9' always is true. :-) This patch fixes it, and
> avoids two just hand coded checks altogether.
>
> Gerald
>
> ChangeLog:
> Fix incorrect check in WCMD_HandleTildaModifiers().
> Use isdigit() instead of hand-coding this check.
Using isdigit() on a Unicode c
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> Hi,
>
> Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
> Workstation.
>
> VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
> fixing/patching things, again and again.
>
> I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) f
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> On Mi, 2009-06-10 at 21:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
>
>> -#ifdef HAVE_GL_GLEXT_H
>> -# include
>> -#endif
>
> The same code is used in winex11.drv/opengl.c
> Can this also be removed?
>
> When that's the case, then "GL/glext.h
Hi,
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and I really like
On Mi, 2009-06-10 at 21:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> -#ifdef HAVE_GL_GLEXT_H
> -# include
> -#endif
The same code is used in winex11.drv/opengl.c
Can this also be removed?
When that's the case, then "GL/glext.h" can be removed from
AC_CHECK_HEADERS in configure.ac
--
By by ... D
32 matches
Mail list logo
