On Tuesday 09 June 2009 07:10:40 Austin English wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> >> Seems to me to be a bug, i.e., Wine shouldn't be able to use 0.0.0.0.
> >> It seems that we're simply passing this on to the host os, which is
> >> then routing it back to localhost. Perha
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Austin English
> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> > I'm not sure Wine should be a special case if it's not breaking apps.
>>
>> While that's arguable , Putty can give a demonstratable corner case
>> that has behavior differ
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Austin English wrote:
> ...
> > I'm not sure Wine should be a special case if it's not breaking apps.
>
> While that's arguable , Putty can give a demonstratable corner case
> that has behavior different on Windows than on Wine, and it's entirely
> likely that ther
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> Seems to me to be a bug, i.e., Wine shouldn't be able to use 0.0.0.0.
>> It seems that we're simply passing this on to the host os, which is
>> then routing it back to localhost. Perhaps we need to catch 0.0.0.0 as
>> a special case and refuse?
>
"Alex Villacís Lasso" wrote:
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I showed that DlgDirList is behaving
incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as well as a patch.
Then a comment appeared saying that it
"Igor Tarasov" wrote:
2009/6/9 Austin English :
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
Maybe just add notice on edit page stating that edits are for minor
changes only, and if one has som
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Igor Tarasov wrote:
> 2009/6/9 Austin English :
>> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
>> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
>> information.
>
> Maybe just add notice on edit page stating that edits are for
2009/6/9 Austin English :
> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
> information.
Maybe just add notice on edit page stating that edits are for minor
changes only, and if one has some additional informati
See also
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/07/msg7.html
I kind of doubt it will ever make it in to ubuntu.
When I tried building win16 binaries with the Linux version,
there were lots of path problems. That was two years ago,
but I wouldn't be surprised if they're still there.
These
2009/6/9 Austin English :
> ping (in cmd.exe):
> D:\appinstall>ping 0.0.0.0
>
> Pinging 0.0.0.0 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> Destination specified is invalid.
> Destination specified is invalid.
> Destination specified is invalid.
> Destination specified is invalid.
>
> Ping statistics for 0.0.0.0:
>
FWIW, using Windows ping.exe under Wine:
Pinging 0.0.0.0 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 0.0.0.0:
Howdy all,
Doing some testing with PuTTY, I've noticed some strange behavior.
I've got windows XP in a VM, and when comparing behavior to Wine, I
noticed some inconsistencies with respect to the '0.0.0.0' invalid
address.
Windows:
Putty -> 0.0.0.0: throws an error "Network error: Cannot assign
re
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:41:57 -0500
Austin English wrote:
> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
> information.
>
+1
It's not quite as big a problem for those of us who use the forum, but if
people do
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> Ask them to put it in a new post?
>
> On 2009-06-09, Austin English wrote:
>> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
>> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
>> information.
While we could do
Ask them to put it in a new post?
On 2009-06-09, Austin English wrote:
> Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
> version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
> information.
>
> --
> -Austin
>
>
>
Did we find out what the regression is for 1.1.23 that caused the ATI
and other non NVIDIA cards to start failing?
Chris
Steven Edwards writes:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Alex Villacís
> Lasso wrote:
>> I downloaded the tests from win16test.googlecode.com , but the tarball
>> already has a small backlog of patches that have not yet been integrated
>> into Wine (checked with patch --dry-run). Why? I could m
André Hentschel wrote:
> Paul Vriens schrieb:
>> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>> Mikołaj Zalewski writes:
>>>
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Alex Villacís
Lasso wrote:
> I downloaded the tests from win16test.googlecode.com , but the tarball
> already has a small backlog of patches that have not yet been integrated
> into Wine (checked with patch --dry-run). Why? I could make a patch to the
> testsuite f
I've tested this on XP, but I would like to get somebody to test on 9x and
maybe even vista please and thank you. These tests are the prelude to
cursoricon patches including Griswold's animated cursors & themed cursors and
my fixes for LOTRO (mostly handling invalid calls properly).
Thanks,
Da
Austin English escribió:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Alex Villacís
Lasso wrote:
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Alex Villacís
Lasso wrote:
> I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
> showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
> included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as well as a
> patch. Then a
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as well as
a patch. Then a comment appeared saying that it should be possible to
create a
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
--
-Austin
André Hentschel wrote:
Vista turns the "(WCHAR)1234" into a "(unsigned char)1234".
This causes error on vista machineshttp://test.winehq.org/data/7aeffc442cc1b9a454f1ff7d7b3175b4bba88b05/vista_esx-wvistaadm/riched20:editor.html
editor.c:3249: Test failed: EM_GETPASSWORDCHAR returned Ò (210) whe
Paul Vriens schrieb:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mikołaj Zalewski writes:
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary SSH tunnel anymore and will move
the HTTP serv
Am 07.06.2009 um 23:34 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
Ok, I guess the format could just be named badly, although Chris makes
a good point about precision, even if the values are normalized.
There's D3DFMT_D24FS8 in the standard d3d formats, so I guess if they
just wanted to make it a float format ther
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 16:57 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
>
> We have that same (or actually newer) page on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.winehq.org/Fun_Projects
>
> Doesn't it make more sense to link this entire page to the wiki?
I think it does. But it would be great if someone can
spend a bit of tim
Ken Sharp wrote:
Disregard first patch.. this one makes a little more sense.
Ken Sharp wrote:
See Bug 7976. Apparently this has already been done.
---
"Vincent Povirk" writes:
> --- a/tools/wine.inf.in
> +++ b/tools/wine.inf.in
> @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ HKCR,.xml,"Content Type",2,"text/xml"
> HKCR,.xsl,"Content Type",2,"text/xsl"
> HKCR,chm.file,,2,"Compiled HTML Help File"
> HKCR,chm.file\shell\open\command,,2,"%11%\hh.exe %1"
> +HKCR,CLSID\{CA
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mikołaj Zalewski writes:
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary SSH tunnel anymore and will move
the HTTP server from my good old Pe
2009. 06. 7, vasárnap keltezéssel 19.44-kor Stefan Dösinger ezt írta:
> Am 07.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>
> > 2009/6/7 Frank Richter :
> >> As far as I could gather DF16 is the "ATI way" of getting a
> >> renderable
> >> 16 bit depth texture.
> > Without knowing much about the actu
32 matches
Mail list logo